linked in facebook twitter rss

  • Interbrand
  • Brandchannel

your chance!
your chance!
Richard Gerstman & Herb Meyers
also of interest...
     
  Richard Gerstman & Herb Meyers Continuity in Brand Packaging: When is it Important?
July 6, 2009

The recent debates about the redesigned Tropicana orange juice packages that made a brief appearance on the market and disappeared after an outpouring of customer complaints brought to light again the need for caution when changing the packages of major brands.

 
 

The problem with the Tropicana packages has been mulled over enough, and there is no reason to rehash the details again. But it may be helpful to review the key elements that brought about the unexpected controversy because these apply to all package redesign ventures. It appears that the designers did not recognize or chose to ignore:

(1) The significance of the Tropicana icon, the straw inserted into an orange, in signifying freshness (i.e., juice straight from the fruit).
(2) The influence of the Tropicana logo on brand selection.
(3) The need for clearly differentiating among several Tropicana line extensions.
(4) The realities of different store display situations.

This spotlights the importance of assessing the realities of the marketplace and recognizing what is important in redesigning the packages of a major brand, whether introducing a line extension, planning product modifications or updating an aging brand.

The importance of brand recognition when changing packaging of a major brand

The temptation of wanting to put a personal stamp on a brand and using the packages to accomplish this is often irresistible. But such well-meaning initiatives require careful planning, a thorough understanding of what makes consumers prefer their products over competitive ones and awareness of the variety of display conditions at the point of sale.

Let’s take a look at how package changes of major brands create different consumer reactions.

Metamucil

To ignore the critical factor of brand recognition when introducing a package design modification is to risk losing loyal customers who, unaware that the package that they have been used to buying has been changed, will not find the altered package and will instead turn to a more recognizable competitive brand. Metamucil Capsules, for example, recently changed its packaging, making it difficult to find in the drugstore, even for the drugstore employee who—in this particular and personal case—tried to be helpful.

The Metamucil Capsules line, which previously referenced the benefits of regularity and fiber supplement, had been divided into two product varieties—one promoting heart and digestive health, the other emphasizing strong bones—each in a redesigned package.

The new packages had little visual reference to the package that had been on the market for years. The large logo was greatly reduced, buried in the midst of a busy promotional label design, and the label colors and cap color for the two varieties had changed. In short, the unannounced product and package design changes had altered the brand imagery of Metamucil to an extent that was confusing.

When there is a product change of a well-known brand, the packages need to retain some visual transition to the design that is being phased out or the marketer will risk losing loyal consumers who are unable to comprehend the unfamiliar product and package design changes.

Pepsi-Cola

The history of Pepsi provides a good example of brand continuity. At the beginning, Pepsi-Cola emulated Coca-Cola with its script logo. Coke had a strong red color as a brand identifier, and Pepsi identified itself with a taller bottle that held several ounces more product than Coke. In the mid-20th century, Pepsi graphics introduced its red-white-and-blue cap design, which later appeared as the round globe shape on the labels. In the latter part of the 20th century, when Pepsi adapted a blue background to contrast with the Coke red, Pepsi’s globe shape became its main brand recognition element.

Last year, Pepsi undertook another package design update. When you see the old and the new packages side by side, this redesign of the Pepsi brand is really quite radical. The bold Pepsi brand name on the previous label has disappeared and been replaced with a much smaller, vertical one. But the designers were careful to retain the well-recognized Pepsi globe, changing it slightly to suggest an inviting smile, and using its bull’s-eye effect as an impactful and memorable display feature. There is no mistaking Pepsi-Cola wherever the new packages appear.

Heinz wine vinegars

Several years ago, Heinz wine vinegars, then in a unique bell-shaped bottle but with an ordinary metal screw cap and a lackluster, industrial-looking label, was redesigned to better communicate the product quality implied by the “Wine Vinegar” product description. By changing the bottleneck configuration and using a flush plastic cap, the bottle could accommodate a neck wrap resembling a wine bottle. Redesigned label graphics further communicated the gourmet quality of the products and emphasized flavor differentiation.

Thus, retaining the unique bottle shape as a reminder of the longstanding product line made brand recognition possible even when neck- and bottle-label graphics were dramatically changed to convey the gourmet quality of the marketer’s brand.

Even when economic considerations require changes in package structure, careful exploration of ways to sustain brand recognition continuity is critical. A recent change, presumably for economic reasons, replaced the bell-shaped Heinz wine vinegar bottle with a simpler, straight-sided bottle. While this required some resizing of the labels, the unique neck- and bottle-label graphics were retained, making the brand unmistakable.

Breyers ice cream

On the other hand, there have been brands built through major changes in package design where existing brand elements were discarded. A good example is Breyers ice cream, which, until the mid-1980s, served a strictly regional, northeastern market. But Breyers wanted a national market and needed a strong national program to compete.

At the time, Breyers had a bland white package that looked like all other ice creams in the retail shelf. To accomplish national distribution, it was suggested that the brand totally change its branding and packaging. Instead of white packages, black became the background color—the first time ever on any dairy package—and the photography and graphic elements were completely changed. Retaining the Breyers leaf logo from the earlier packaging, the new design featured oversized, mouth-watering photography of ice cream that, against the black background, enabled each flavor to pop off the shelf.

Since then, low-fat and other varieties have been added to the Breyers line. These are differentiated through additions of color on the package. The most recent line extension, Smooth & Dreamy, introduces bright colors but maintains the black background at the top for brand continuity. Thus, though some package “drama” has been lost by reducing the ice cream photos and a new angled Breyers logo, brand identity recognition has been maintained.

While brand identity continuity was less critical when Breyers ice cream moved from being a regional brand to becoming a national brand, design continuity for this leading national brand is now a necessity.

Carefully planned strategy is critical when changing packaging of a major brand

Some major package design changes are successful, and some are not. When a major package change discards recognizable elements on the package, marketers and designers must carefully evaluate the risks. It may be the right thing to do at the right time. But it can backfire if the realities of the marketplace and the brand equities are not carefully assessed.

While there are exceptions, most brand strategies require sustained brand recognition continuity, especially when the brand is performing well, when it has a recognizable color and unique graphic elements, when it is marketed to older people, and when the brand’s non-packaging elements are not being changed.

 
   
   Herb Meyers and Richard Gerstman formed the design consultancy, Gerstman+Meyers, now part of the Interbrand Group. Herb Meyers has authored several books (three books co-written with Richard) and lectures on packaging and corporate identification subjects. Richard Gerstman, also an accomplished author, regularly contributes articles to the branding industry and lectures on packaging and marketing issues.



 
 commenting closed Add Social Bookmark bookmark  print
 suggest topic  recommend ( 24 )  email

Continuity in Brand Packaging: When is it Important?
 
 Sometimes it just comes down to luck. If the campaign had been succesful, there would have been article on what Tropicana did right based on the same strategy. 
David Yeoh - July 6, 2009
 
 The packaging design change impacts brand loyalty, I am used to be Pepsi old design 
Rock, Manager, Rock Package Limited - July 6, 2009
 
 I wouldn't have a moment's difficulty finding the Metamucil, but even after all this time, I am still having trouble finding a bottle of diet Pepsi, much less caffeine-free diet Pepsi, convenience stores. How can Pepsi get high marks when Metamucil is criticized? I think it comes down to making up your mind which you're going to praise and which you're going to fault. Where's the data? 
Tim Orr, Barnett Orr Marketing Group, Inc. - July 6, 2009
 
 Let's not forget the role in-store, in-home or out-of-home communications play to inform and educate consumers that changes have taken place. Integrated communications should be the norm not the exception. 
Dave Wohlner, President, Linear SC Inc - July 8, 2009
 
 Great examples included in this article. To anyone who is considering updating or changing a logo this is a must read! 
Michelle Chun-Hoon, Intern, CKR Interactive - July 9, 2009
 
view all comments
  brandchannel brandspeak archive   2014  |  2013  |  2012  |  2011  |  2010  | 2009  |  2008  |  2007  |  2006  |  2005  |  2004  |  2003  |  2002  |  2001
 
 
Nov 13, 2009 Employees Are the Brand -- William Arruda
  Brand outward by looking in.
   
 
Oct 16, 2009 Branding Airports -- Brian Rodino
  Why branding airports will fly.
   
 
Oct 7, 2009 The Demise and Rise of Branding -- Denise Lee Yohn
  The basics for branding through bad times.
   
 
Sep 14, 2009 A New Sustainable Language for Business -- Melissa Davis
  Why sustainability has 28 million definitions.
   
 
Aug 31, 2009 How Can Your Packaging Become Disruptive? -- Ted Mininni
  Get shelf-help with disruptive packaging.
   
 
Aug 17, 2009 Four Opportunities to Strengthen a Brand Community -- Lara Lee
  The keys to resolving hidden tensions online.
   
 
Aug 3, 2009 Why Packaging Matters More than Ever -- Ted Minini
  Now is the time to keep design in mind.
   
 
Jul 20, 2009 Branding Beauty in an Ugly Economy
  How cosmetic brands can look good in a bad economy.
   
 
Jun 22, 2009 Build Your Brand from the Inside Out -- Morgan Daloisio
  Engage employees as brand proof points.
   
 
Jun 8, 2009 How Can You Mend a Broken Brand? -- Michael Stone
  How licensing allows broken brands new life.
   
 
May 25, 2009 Painful Economic Contractions Can Be a Good Thing -- Claire Ratushny
  Brands live and die in a recession.
   
 
May 11, 2009 Put Your Message in the Moment: What Can and Can’t Be Said Now -- Mark Thomson
  Allowing consumers behind the branding curtain.
   
 
Apr 27, 2009 Economy Spells Opportunity to Evaluate Brand Portfolio -- Larry Lucas and Jorge Aguilar
  Take a tough look at hard assets.
   
 
Apr 13, 2009 Achieving Accountable Marketing: Six Critical Value Levers Must Be Pulled -- Michael Dunn
  How accountable marketing adds value.
   
 
Mar 30, 2009 Get Back to Basics. Win Back the Trust. -- Ted Mininni
  How to build faith in unbelievable times.
   
 
Mar 16, 2009 Time for a Brand Stimulus Package -- Kevin Randall
  How strong brands react to a weak economy.
   
 
Mar 2, 2009 Get Real -- Claire Ratushny
  Brand survival in a recession.
   
 
Feb 16, 2009 Goya is Big, But Not Great (Yet) -- Larry Lucas and Jorge Aguilar
  Goya must connect with more than taste buds.
   
 
Feb 2, 2009 How Strong is Your Brand? -- Denise Lee Yohn
  How brands can thrive in an economic dive.
   
 
Jan 19, 2009 A Dimensional View of Experiential Marketing -- Gavin Finn
  How virtual branding creates real loyalty.
   
 
Jan 5, 2009 Brands: Taking a Narrow View -- Chris Heile
  Why brands should target some rather than most.