|
|
| |
In North America, consumers best know Bosch as a manufacturer of premium car parts favored by both do-it-yourselfers and professional mechanics. In fact, if you’ve ever bought a spark plug, you likely know the Bosch name, thanks to the company’s long involvement with the product it invented in 1902.
In Europe, the Bosch name has a wider reach with consumers due not only to its association with car parts but also its leadership in the areas of household appliances, security systems, and broadband networks (only in Germany). The company also operates many automobile service stations under the Bosch name across Europe.
However, when Bosch functions in the context of an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) in the car manufacturing business, it trips up -- especially in North America. The company’s failure to aggressively brand the technologies it has created has led to a severe market share loss, according to Waldemar Pfoertsch, an International Business professor at Pforzheim University in Germany.
|
|
| |
As an example, Pfoertsch cites the technology that electronically stabilizes cars and helps keep them from rolling over, known as ESP (electronic stability program) in Europe and ESC (electronic stability control) in North America. Bosch developed this technology in conjunction with Mercedes-Benz but it only appeared in Mercedes’s S-class cars. In 1999, an A-class car rolled over in a test.
“Can you imagine a Mercedes rolling over?” Pfoertsch asks. “Mercedes’s quality was at stake, so they redesigned the car in two weeks. But Bosch didn’t brand the technology, so now they’re not the only ones supplying it to American car manufacturers.”
“At the end of the day,” counters Klaus Deller, Executive Vice-President of the Central Department Automotive Equipment Worldwide Sales Coordination for Bosch in Germany, “the consumer buys a car -- often a very emotional decision -- and not an anti-lock braking system (ABS) or a diesel pump.”
However, the company is hardly invisible. Deller cites recognition such as Bosch’s ranking at third place in an April 2003 list of top German brands in the Financial Times German edition, and 51st in a recent worldwide survey from Fortune magazine.
Reinhard Binder, a member of the Executive Management Committee at Interbrand Zintzmeyer and Lux in Germany, acknowledges Deller’s comment but thinks that supplier brands like Bosch can do more to promote themselves. “Above all, the consumer wants to buy a brand, which acts as a status symbol and promises more and can do more than just satisfying a need. At this point, the manufacturers have to prove their technical and innovative potential.
“What was called ‘Boschtronic’ in former times is called ‘motor management’ today, for example,” Binder continues. “And in the future, OEMs will have very few chances to profit from their competence and their brand. Even in the field of replacement parts, the automotive companies consider their branding very important. The Bosch brand will be perceived only with respect to their household products.”
Binder hints at one of the issues that Pfoertsch admits stands in the way of the company: OEMs keep suppliers’ names off cars (Bose and Blaupunkt are noticeable exceptions) and beat them down when it comes to pricing. “Then again,” Pfoertsch says, “if Bosch had a brand, price wouldn’t be a crucial issue because they would have market share.”
As another illustration, he points to anti-lock braking systems, a technology that Bosch pioneered in 1978. Ten years ago the company had 90 percent of that market. Now they have 30 percent. “So if Bose could brand a non-critical part, why can’t Bosch brand a critical one?” he asks.
Pfoertsch goes on to compare Bosch’s situation in the car business with the branding of critical parts in the computer industry, where Intel dominates because of its brilliant “Intel Inside” stickers and the accompanying advertising campaign. The company succeeded in driving consumers to look for computers that sport Intel processors, which in turn solidified the “Wintel” hegemony that marginalized all other operating system/processor combinations.
|
| |
|
“Have you ever seen an ‘Intel Inside’ sticker on a car?” asks Deller in response to that suggestion. “There are many Intel chips in a car. The company is a compelling story, but it doesn’t apply to the automotive industry.”
Binder agrees. “In the automotive industry, the motor has the same importance as a chip in a computer,” he explains. “But, even under the assumption that Bosch would produce motors, it would require an immense brand power created by unique product performance.”
Deller suggests that branding considerations weren’t as strong in the early days and are now next to impossible thanks to the way the industry works. In contrast, the computer business matured during an era of increasing sensitivity to the value of branding, which gave rise to Intel’s strategy. “It would be great to replicate [Intel’s success in the automotive industry],” says Deller, “but it’s 80 years too late to do it.”
But Pfoertsch insists that the auto industry “needs a new way of working together, and the lead could come from consumers. The OEMs view the car engine as critical, but the consumer views brakes, comfort, safety, etc., as critical; they assume the engine works. Branding should be different in this business.”
But should branding on cars reach the point where our cars look like they belong on a NASCAR track? Binder points out that OEMs only manufacture about 30 percent of the vehicles themselves, outsourcing the rest in increasing quantities, including the research and development. “Were all these parts branded by the suppliers,” Binder says, “cars would be covered with a lot of brand names. We automatically associate the manufacturer with how a car performs, both when it works and when it doesn’t.”
Bosch’s Deller seems to agree. “If I tell you that our 1800 bar Diesel injection pump has splendid performance, what do you make of it?” he asks. “Probably nothing. If I tell you that the BMW 730 is equipped with it, you can appreciate the power.”
In the end, the branding issue in the automotive business may truly be one where the product is more than the sum of its parts, and companies like Bosch may be tilting at windmills if they plan to individually brand each of the parts they manufacture. Still, one could easily argue that Bosch is missing an opportunity to associate its name with, for instance, the power of that BMW 730.
It has already missed opportunities in the areas of anti-lock brakes and electronic stability. Instead it continues to capitalize on its strong association with spark plugs, which most consumers don’t even think about when they buy a car (and those who do care can easily and relatively cheaply replace those parts after purchase).
“Bosch needs to brand or they will just become one of many,” says Pfoertsch. “They’re working on it internally, but it will take a long time because they move slowly.”
Deller acknowledges this, saying that a “dedicated team is working on brand recognition in automotive. As is Bosch’s way of doing things, this does not happen with a lot of noise but with much more discretion.”
Perhaps too much discretion. Binder takes a much dimmer view of the brand: “Today Bosch is operating worldwide, but almost nobody takes notice of it.” That’s not a strong position for this old-line brand. It remains to be seen if this early pioneer in the automotive field will see out another century. [8-Sep-2003]
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Brad Cook is a freelance writer based in Sunnyvale, CA. He has published over 120 articles in a variety of print and online media since 1995.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Nov 24, 2003
|
Low-Carbs: Are Brands Losing It? -- Dale Buss
|
|
|
Food and beverage brands deal with the latest trend to hit the industry: the low-carb frenzy. Is it time to throw your entire product line down the trash disposal over a trend?
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Oct 20, 2003
|
Taking Advantage of Women -- Edwin Colyer
|
|
|
Would you like a loyal customer from cradle to grave? Pharmaceutical companies are missing out on opportunities for a long-term product line for women.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Oct 6, 2003
|
Made where? -- Ron Irwin
|
|
|
English roses grown in Kenya, American skis built in China, Italian shoes made in Romania? Home brands insist offshore production is the only route for survival.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Sep 29, 2003
|
Turning Over a New Leaf? -- Edwin Colyer
|
|
|
We care about our staff and the environment… right? Are businesses really improving their records on environmental responsibility? Or is this cynical marketing at work?
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Sep 15, 2003
|
Pharmaceuticals Go to the Dogs -- Edwin Colyer
|
|
|
Do consumers want the same drugs as their dog? Some like Pfizer offer animal and human products all under one brand. Others like Merck and Eli Lilly prefer to keep man and beast separate.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Jul 28, 2003
|
Samsung Shows its Strength -- Robin Rusch
|
|
|
Five years ago Samsung Electronics was a cheap Korean brand; today it’s a quality name that climbs to number 25 in Interbrand and BusinessWeek’s top global brands survey.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Jun 30, 2003
|
Delivering Global Brands -- Edwin Colyer
|
|
|
Global express distribution operators, like TNT and Exel, are consolidating supply chains to better service and win contracts with brands like Deutsche Post, FedEx and UPS.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Apr 7, 2003
|
Happily Ever After? -- Dale Buss
|
|
|
Looking to ally forces in a co-branding relationship? Match-making is a skill fraught with pitfalls, but done right it can expand market and grow opportunities.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Mar 31, 2003
|
The Brands We Love to Hate -- David Liss
|
|
|
What can we learn from the brands we just can't stand? WWE, Jerry Springer and NASCAR aren't as far from Tiffany's or BMW as we may like to believe.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2013 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|
|