|
|
| |
The cynical view says that corporate social responsibility (CSR) is just the latest lobbying tool. In the UK, at least, political donations are a big no-no for corporations. CSR is simply another way of winning favor with government.
A more charitable view says that consumers and companies now realize that sustainability makes sense. Murray Hogarth of Australian-based Ecos Corporation, prefers this positive stance. “Compared to 20 years ago, then yes, people are more responsible. We’re seeing young CEOs coming in and they have greater instincts for the environment and sustainability. These people have grown up with these issues.”
Andy Acho agrees that concern for the environment has improved. He says that when Bill Ford tried to promote environmental strategies at Ford in the early 1990s, he struggled to win support. Nevertheless, he was still able to appoint Acho as Worldwide Director of Environmental Outreach and Strategy at Ford Motor Company. “Your job,” Acho quotes Ford as saying, “is to champion proactive environmental action around the world. It will be good for the environment and good for Ford.”
For Rebecca Collings, head of CSR at Corporate Edge, the concept of corporate responsibility has simply turned full circle. “All the long established companies started out within communities. They were community-based and therefore acted responsibly, for example by building workers’ housing or providing schools. With globalization the accountability disappeared. But consumer pressure has helped to remind businesses that they have responsibilities.”
Yet CSR makes sense. “It is a logical business strategy,” says Collings. “It’s easy to see how decreasing energy consumption, for instance, can lower costs. You can save up to 30 percent in business energy costs, simply with good housekeeping measures such as turning off lights and computers.”
|
|
| |
Environmental and social concern often gives an obvious return on investment. Less waste means less cost. Better treatment of staff means more people stay longer and you spend less on recruitment and training.
Acho lists numerous environmental activities at Ford that have a direct financial benefit. For instance, by switching from wooden to plastic reusable containers for car parts, the company saved up to US$ 4 per engine; the move also improved product quality because there was less dust in the paint shops. Similarly, the company planted trees around a new plant in Brazil to replace those chopped down -- and consequently lowered the temperature inside the plant, saving energy costs. Another scheme, involving Born Again Binders, which reused ring binders in the company’s HQ, saved over $ 100,000. “It makes sense to be green, even if you don’t care about the environment,” says Acho.
The Body Shop saw the benefits of a green approach when it was founded in the 1970s. “The business was very much founded on the personal values of Anita and Gordon Roddick,” says Nicky Amos, Head of Corporate Responsibility. “They had strong principles in protecting human rights and the environment. They also had to be frugal. As a start up they couldn’t spend much on packaging. Bottles were reused because there weren’t enough to go round, and shop interiors were simple because they were cheap.”
If companies have finally realized the financial benefits of cleaning up their act, their next question is how else to turn these efforts to their advantage. They want to communicate their efforts to customers and investors, perhaps through a new responsible brand.
“When this began, the mere fact that you had a policy was a differentiator,” says Ecos’ Hogarth. “Now it is more sophisticated, and depends more on what you are actually doing.” You can’t kid the more environmentally conscious consumer anymore by just adding a dash of CSR magic to your marketing. “Consumers get furious about greenwashing. You can’t just badge products as green. You need to get your own house in order. The marketing challenge for business begins inside the company. If you can’t convince your own staff then you’ll never convince consumers,” Hogarth cautions.
“You shouldn’t make CSR part of a brand unless you are walking the talk,” agrees Collings at Corporate Edge. “You should only talk about CSR if you really are measuring and managing your social and environmental performance. It can otherwise cause serious reputational damage.” She describes the experience of her client adidas, which has worked at managing its supply chain to ensure CSR carries right through the organization’s activities. “Nothing has been communicated to the public, but somehow the company has differentiated itself. The fact that you do the right thing rather than saying you are doing it -- somehow it seeps out. There’s a huge risk if you try to make something of CSR -- people will always try to prove you wrong.”
|
| |
|
“You’ve got to think holistically,” warns Ken Peattie, Director of the ESRC Centre for Business Relationships Accountability, Sustainability and Society at the University of Cardiff in the UK. “It needs to be done from the heart, not because it is seen as a good idea or a means of competitive advantage. You need to be holistic; the media love a hypocrite.”
Acho agrees that CSR should not be seen as part of a marketing strategy. “We’re not doing our environmental work for PR or for marketing, but because it makes good sense. The environment is part of what we do as a normal course of action. Do we have the reputation? I don’t think we have the reputation we deserve. We’ll have to do much more before our efforts are really recognized. I think the public is twice as likely to discredit you for not being green as for rewarding you for being green.”
While CSR should not form an explicit part of brand communication, companies are, nevertheless, faced with a terrible dilemma: CSR still has a direct influence on brand equity. Those companies not convinced by the triple bottom line and hoping to get away with the minimum should heed Peattie: “There’s no dividing line between brand management and corporate responsibility.” [29-Sep-2003]
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Edwin Colyer is a science and technology writer based in Manchester, UK.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Nov 24, 2003
|
Low-Carbs: Are Brands Losing It? -- Dale Buss
|
|
|
Food and beverage brands deal with the latest trend to hit the industry: the low-carb frenzy. Is it time to throw your entire product line down the trash disposal over a trend?
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Oct 20, 2003
|
Taking Advantage of Women -- Edwin Colyer
|
|
|
Would you like a loyal customer from cradle to grave? Pharmaceutical companies are missing out on opportunities for a long-term product line for women.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Oct 6, 2003
|
Made where? -- Ron Irwin
|
|
|
English roses grown in Kenya, American skis built in China, Italian shoes made in Romania? Home brands insist offshore production is the only route for survival.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Sep 15, 2003
|
Pharmaceuticals Go to the Dogs -- Edwin Colyer
|
|
|
Do consumers want the same drugs as their dog? Some like Pfizer offer animal and human products all under one brand. Others like Merck and Eli Lilly prefer to keep man and beast separate.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Jul 28, 2003
|
Samsung Shows its Strength -- Robin Rusch
|
|
|
Five years ago Samsung Electronics was a cheap Korean brand; today it’s a quality name that climbs to number 25 in Interbrand and BusinessWeek’s top global brands survey.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Jun 30, 2003
|
Delivering Global Brands -- Edwin Colyer
|
|
|
Global express distribution operators, like TNT and Exel, are consolidating supply chains to better service and win contracts with brands like Deutsche Post, FedEx and UPS.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Apr 7, 2003
|
Happily Ever After? -- Dale Buss
|
|
|
Looking to ally forces in a co-branding relationship? Match-making is a skill fraught with pitfalls, but done right it can expand market and grow opportunities.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Mar 31, 2003
|
The Brands We Love to Hate -- David Liss
|
|
|
What can we learn from the brands we just can't stand? WWE, Jerry Springer and NASCAR aren't as far from Tiffany's or BMW as we may like to believe.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2013 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|
|