|
|
| |
Passport? Check. Toothbrush? Check. Hotel booked? Check. For most of us, our choice of hotel is little more than a "comfortable bed to sleep in"—another tick on our checklist of travel priorities. Or at least it used to be until the arrival of the "boutique hotel." Now, sophisticated travelers expect the hotel to be an experience in itself.
If you want proof of this, look no further than Babington House in Somerset, England. When Babington House opened in the mid-nineties, it created a trend for country houses with the comforts of a cosmopolitan members' club. The hotel is slap bang in the middle of the English countryside. Customers go there because of the hotel and the experience, rather than because of where it is. Most guests don't see any reason to leave either. There are acres of grounds to explore, a spa, a pool, a cinema and a top-notch restaurant.
But what makes a boutique hotel boutique? It's probably easier to describe what a boutique hotel is not. Some rules:
Rule 1: A boutique hotel doesn't feel big.
Rule 2: A boutique hotel doesn't feel part of a chain.
Rule 3: A boutique hotel doesn't feel traditional.
The phenomenon might have started out small and specialized (Blakes, a small 50 room London hotel, is said to have been one of the first), but now the term has all but broadened to embrace any hotel that feels boutique. Some hoteliers have dropped the boutique label altogether; opting to be known as "chic," "hip," or "lifestyle." But semantics aside, it's all down to attitude. Babington House might not be small, but the service is attentive. Morgan Hotels (formerly known as Ian Schrager hotels) may be part of a chain—but each hotel is individually designed so that it doesn't feel like one.
|
|
| |
Traditional hotels take a more textbook approach to branding. It doesn't matter whether you visit a Holiday Inn in Boston, Bangkok or Birmingham, you know what you're going to get. The logo, the lobby and the rooms all look more or less the same. But now that the boutique hotel sector is growing quicker and commanding higher room occupancies than its more traditional competition, the brand textbook might need to be rewritten.
Starwood hotels have created sub-brands called W hotels to answer the boutique challenge. Hilton have dabbled in the sector by creating a one-off sparsely branded "lifestyle hotel" in London's Trafalgar Square. But what about the big names? Can an established chain go boutique even if it wanted to? And just how do you attract customers, if you throw traditional "big is best" branding out of the hotel window?
It starts with word of mouth. It's no coincidence that the boutique label has fashion connotations. Like its namesake, the hotels have established designer names (Ian Schrager, Olga Polizzi) and a monthly hip hotel bible, Condé Nast's Traveller.
Babington creates a word of mouth of its own by selling its Cowshed spa products on the high street. Naturally the products encapsulate all the brand's ideals: luxury not mass-produced, and a little on the pricey side. Similarly, the famed Hôtel Costes in Paris is as known for its CDs mixed by DJ Stéphane Pompougnac as it is for its hotel. People buy into the products because of the hotel and vice versa.
Next, there's the strength of the Internet to help propel the boutique hotel trend. Try Googling any of the hotels mentioned in this article and a crop of hotel portal sites will appear, all offering to find a room for you. The web has done more than anything to turn the tables on the way customers organize travel. According to an ABTA report published last year, of the 48 percent of the British population who have access to the Internet at home, 68 percent of adults used the Internet for information about travel and accommodation.
Finally, hotels no longer have to rely on the recognition that a large hotel brand chain guarantees. Guides like Hip Hotels and Design Hotels do the legwork for them. The publishers of Hip Hotels recognized a desire to see and explore hotels from the coffee table even if fans would never be able to afford a room in real life.
British guide Mr and Mrs Smith has probably captured the individuality, comfort and experience of these new hotels best. Like Hip Hotels, it's an enticing coffee table book, filled with photos of all the chic hotel trappings: crisp white bed linen, cozy fireplaces and sparkling bathrooms. But it's also a down-to-earth guidebook with reviews by real people. "The book came about when Mrs Smith (Tamara) and I were going away for a busy weekend," explains James Lohan, the "Mr" in Mr and Mrs Smith. "We work in PR so we're incredibly well connected socialites. But we found we were taking recommendations from faceless guidebooks. We only managed to hear from hotels that capture the press. But many of the smaller hotels don't know how to PR themselves. That's one of the ways our book comes in."
The guide helps clear up some of the surface contradictions of the boutique experience. It recognizes that a great hotel isn't just about good looks or expensive prices, "We recognize individuals. One week you want a Champagne blowout in Babington. Other times, you want a cozy pub," adds Lohan.
However, Mr and Mrs Smith's masterstroke is that it has created an exclusive club for the price of a book. "Everyone loves personal recommendations," Lohan says. "We're just offering it on a bigger scale. It's very simple. What's the best room? Which restaurant table gives you the window view? Is the bed going to give me backache?" But the insider club analogy doesn't end there. A membership card is affixed to the inside cover of the book with a unique number. Once readers register (and 21,000 of the 80,000 book's buyers have already done so), they are sent insider info on the latest hotel openings and offers from Mr and Mrs Smith. The founders turned a passion for individual hotels into a brand.
This article started with three rules, but there's probably a fourth unwritten rule to add: boutique hotels are expensive. On first glance, the Dakota hotel near Nottingham in the UK appears to fit all four rules. It has a startling black exterior that would make Darth Vader proud, a fabulous looking restaurant, bar and plasma screens in every one of its above averagely sized rooms. But—and here's the clincher—every room is an affordable £80 a night (US$ 140.00).
|
| |
|
Dakota is the brainchild of Ken McCulloch, owner of Columbus, a luxury hotel chain based in Monaco. "Ken has incredible vision," declares Euan McGlashan, group director of Dakota hotels. "He loves style and can create that without ripping people off. If Columbus is the luxury BMW 7 series, Dakota is the 3 series."
Dakota has reduced costs in a number of shrewd ways. The interiors have been designed in-house by Amanda Rosa (McCulloch's wife); site location is key (the first hotel is near an office complex); and some of the luxury extras such as robes and room service have been skimped upon. But the owners are investing in the boutique triggers that count: they're planning to invest in a customer service academy for their staff. And of course, it helps that the hotels look stylish too.
The launch of Dakota hotels could be a decisive gear change for the boutique phenomenon. It could end up doing what Zara and H&M have done for high street fashion. It could, to quote McGlashan, "create beautifully chic hotels for the masses." The opening of a Camper hotel in Barcelona (by the same people who make the shoes) suggests there might be more to this than fanciful analogy.
Dakota plans to open 40 to 50 hotels in the UK; more are to follow in Europe and the US. In a way this takes the hotel industry full circle. If Dakota can get its brand template right, it could close the gap between the attitude of a boutique hotel and the reach of larger chains. McGlashan predicts, "90 percent of the hotel industry will be owned by ten or 11 companies that drive down costs." But it might be the impact of the other ten percent (hotels like Dakota and those coveted by Mr and Mrs Smith) that the other 90 percent will want to imitate.
[8-Aug-2005]
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Rob Mitchell advises brands how to use language and express their tone of voice for The Writer in London.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Oct 24, 2005
|
Branding, a Job Well Done -- Dale Buss
|
|
|
How do major brands like Costco and Ritz-Carlton become household names without relying on traditional advertising? By tapping into their greatest resource: Employees.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Jul 25, 2005
|
Best Global Brands: Focus on UBS -- Robin Rusch
|
|
|
Among the top five fastest growing brands on the list of 100 Best Global Brands 2005, Swiss financial services company UBS reflects the work in progress of growing and sustaining a global brand.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Jun 20, 2005
|
Growing Pains Small Brands -- Alicia Clegg
|
|
|
How can a brand remain true while broadening its reach? Popular but small brands like Innocent Drinks, Tyrrells and Hill Station risk losing their original fans in their quest to grow bigger.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Apr 18, 2005
|
Dove Gets Real -- Alicia Clegg
|
|
|
Unilever’s Dove is the latest beauty brand to use "real" women to sell product. But can this campaign turn ugly?
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Mar 7, 2005
|
Should Global Brands Trash Local Favorites? -- Randall Frost
|
|
|
When P&G, Unilever and Nestlé clean house, they risk losing local markets for beloved brands. Companies like Henkel, on the other hand, retain a portfolio of national and international brands to satisfy both global and local tastes.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2010 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|
|