|
|
| |
|
| |
Stroud, working from UK census figures, predicts that over the next 15 years, “If you focus on the 15 to 34 market sector you will see virtually no increase in your market [from population growth]... If your customers are in the 50 to 69 category, you will increase your business by over 20 percent without having to increase your market share.”
The corporate world’s failure to take advantage of this opportunity is as much about culture as strategy. Put simply, wrinkled faces are not aspirational, either for brands or the advanced guard of baby boomers massing at the gateway of later life. So how should brands cater for a society growing older but wanting to stay young?
One possibility is for advertisers to take the lead from youth culture, in the hope that what appeals to the biologically young will also appeal to youthful seniors. Superficially, the approach is justified by our obsession with youth. But there is a problem. In a UK study conducted by Millennium, a mature market advertising agency, it turned out that far from being flattered by this treatment, 86 percent of consumers over 50-years-old considered contemporary advertising “irrelevant” to them. Studies elsewhere have produced similar results.
The flaw in youth-centered marketing is the obvious one. As Stroud observes, while older consumers may have “youthful” instincts, they won’t necessarily take to the imagery, language and humor that appeals to a 20-year-old. So might the solution be to associate brands with youth icons from the past?
The UK retailer Marks & Spencer clearly thinks so. Last autumn it launched advertising, featuring sixties fashion icon Twiggy with contemporary model Erin O’Connor. The style press lapped it up and the campaign has taken some of the credit for an improvement in M&S’s clothing sales. Fashion brand Gap ran a campaign four years ago by mixing younger and older celebrities, which was followed by an eleven percent rise in sales.
Such successes apart, there is clearly a limit to how often the device can be used. An obvious danger is hiring warmed up celebrities who lack credibility—think Lulu and David Bowie, not Joan Collins and Cliff Richard. Blending iconic hits or retro imagery into contemporary settings is another possibility. But, even here, there is a risk of restricting a brand’s appeal. What draws in the Woodstock generation, for example, won’t necessarily play well with an eighties punk, let alone an Elvis fan.
Stroud argues that while nostalgia has a place in the marketer’s repertoire, the most effective commercials, such as Honda’s fantasy creations, are timeless. But age-neutral marketing isn’t only about creative ideas.
|
| |
|
“It’s simply a fact that from around the age of 40, eyesight deteriorates,” says Millennium director Kevin Lavery. “As much as the creative director may object, you need to be aware that plain typefaces, larger fonts and high contrast color combinations work better for older consumers.”
The marketing world’s lack of interest in mature customers can have bizarre consequences. One example is media owners not differentiating between consumers who are 90 and those who are 60. Over-55 specialist Janet Kiddle, founder of Steel Magnolia, says ageism is rife. “Many brands segment their customers by attitude, but then apply an age-cap. Sometimes it’s 65; but many don’t segment beyond 55.”
Ignoring a group that accounts for 40 percent of consumer spending and a staggering 80 percent of personal wealth is nothing short of lunacy. So, it’s not surprising that some companies are putting a positive spin on aging, pronouncing “sixty the new forty,” and claiming that having changed the face of youth, the rock-and-roll generation will change the face of old age.
Such clichés are at best an over-simplification carrying an implicitly ageist message: older people are consumers too—just as long as they behave like young people. What also gets lost in the froth is the fact that individuals of the same age can be light years apart in life-stage: raising a family at fifty or babysitting grandchildren; globe-trotting at seventy or caring for a partner who is frail and dependent.
Some businesses are already negotiating the complexities of population aging. Just over a year ago, Thomson Holidays scrapped its “Young at Heart” brochure aimed at over 55s. Says head of product development Stephen Lane: “Many people in their fifties and sixties are adventurous—they don’t want to be labeled young at heart.” To cater for this segment, Thomson brought in sports breaks and spa packages and added yoga and tai chi to its leisure options. Says Lane: “We have to keep experimenting.” But he adds: “There are still a lot of people who want tea and biscuits and a brandy in the evening.”
Other far-sighted businesses are looking at how aging affects the human body. A prime example is Ford Motor Company which developed the Ford Focus with the aid of a special “third age suit,” allowing designers to get a taste of how it feels to drive with stiff joints, dulled vision and restricted mobility. Another innovator is the British home improvement firm B&Q, which sells ergonomically “inclusive” products. Says B&Q diversity specialist Joy Ward: “The products aren’t marketed for a particular age-group, but they are designed not to exclude people. If you make a lighter-weight drill or a garden tool with padded grips that suits an older person, everyone benefits.”
The emergence of inclusive design shows that businesses are waking up to the fact that mature consumers will reward brands that show them consideration. In fact, there is also an opportunity to make products specifically for older people. Some of the large IT firms, such as Intel and Philips, are exploring this niche. Among the latest advances are virtual networks designed to combat social isolation, and “smart home systems,” which raise the alarm when the resident is inactive or takes a tumble.
For the moment such experiments are dwarfed by the anti-aging industry, which revolves around functional foods and high-tech cosmetics to help baby boomers cheat the passage of time. But, the oldest cohort of mature consumers is expanding too, boosting the number of centenarians by eight percent each year. As the purchasing power of the oldest of the old rises, helped along by the trend for converting equity into income, it’s inevitable that firms will look more seriously at a group that many still term “geriatric.” Much as they might regret it, brands are being forced to accept that it’s the old, not the young, who represent their future.
[24-Apr-2006]
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Alicia Clegg is a freelance journalist and writer based in the UK. She has a developing interest in the mature market and would be pleased to hear from brands and marketers working in this area.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Jul 31, 2006
|
Building Appeal -- Randall Frost
|
|
|
Part art, part science, the field of branding architecture has never been more relevant to firms around the world.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Mar 13, 2006
|
Standards: Who Needs Them? -- Edwin Colyer
|
|
|
By setting standards, organizations like ISO, EFQM, and Eco-label create a mark of distinction for brands to promote. But rules differ greatly between the groups on who gets to use the mark and how.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2010 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|
|