|
|
| |
|
| |
The company recently completed its "Buckley's Bad Taste Tour" and plans to launch another one shortly. Passing out spoonfuls of its liquid in much the same way as breweries and wineries, Buckley's videotaped the reactions to the samplings, posted them on its website, polled online visitors, and announced that the winner, "Jen C." from Toronto—she with the most pained and revolted look on her face—would be used in a future advertising spot. She also won a five-year supply of Buckley's, worth about CDN$ 500 (US$ 430).
"It was ridiculous," Datta says, still amazed. "We had hundreds of people hanging around, watching the reactions others had to tasting Buckley's. Normally, when you have a bad-tasting product, people don't want to try it. But we had people lining up for 45 minutes. That shows how much share-of-heart Buckley's has among consumers."
Indeed, Datta says Buckley's 200 ml size has been the number-one selling cough syrup in Canada for more than five years and it's the number-three SKU (stock keeping unit) behind bottles of Advil and Tylenol.
Buckley's Mixture has tasted horrible since it was developed by W.K. Buckley, a Toronto pharmacist, in 1919. He discovered several natural ingredients used in the treatment of coughs and colds—the company keeps the recipe a secret, of course—and combined them to create his signature product. (He formed his company, W.K. Buckley Limited, a year later.)
Facing lagging sales in the mid-1980s, the company sought a marketing boost from his son, Frank, who had been with the firm in various capacities since returning from World War II.
A groundbreaking campaign trumpeting the truly awful taste of Buckley's and its remarkable healing powers was soon launched with Frank as the spokesperson.
Transit ads featuring Buckley quipping, "I came by my bad taste honestly—I inherited it from my father" and "I wake up with nightmares that someone gives me a taste of my own medicine" were very popular, won several advertising awards, and—most importantly—helped sales surge by 10 percent.
(Other popular Buckley's tag lines include "Open wide and say "@#$%&*!" and "When it comes to being sick, there are two kinds of people in this world: those who want comfort and those who want to get better. We make medicine for the second kind.")
"One of our principles is to be honest and straightforward," Datta says. "The brand has no qualms about stating it the way it is. Buckley's isn't for everyone. Large portions of the population will never try it if they can have a sweet-tasting product instead. We've stuck to it even though there's been a lot of pressure from consumers to introduce a good-tasting version of Buckley's.
"We've made a conscious choice to not be everything to everyone," he adds. "We believe consumers respect our honest approach."
Buckley's does have a sweet tooth, however, as the company offers a better-tasting option for children. (Good luck getting a kid to taste something as horrible as the adult version when they're tired and sick, Datta says.) At some point, though, they'll be tested with the real thing.
"It has a very ritualistic component," Datta says. " 'Are you ready for Buckley's? Are you tough enough?' These are strange things for a cough brand to be impacting."
Buckley's was spoofed during Canada's federal election campaign earlier this year on the popular television show "This Hour Has 22 Minutes." The skit showed a number of people making the same kind of screwed-up faces as in the Buckley's spots but in this case, the people followed up by marking an "X" beside Stephen Harper's name. The Conservative leader went on to defeat the incumbent Liberals and win a minority government the following week.
"When the nation's top sketch-comedy troupe starts poking fun at you, I think you're doing something right," Datta says.
Of course, if Buckley's didn't work, all that taste-bud torture would be for naught and the product wouldn't sell. Datta says that's the understated second, but equally important, tenet of the brand. "The fact the brand delivers on its promise reinforces for consumers that they're making the right decision. Suffering the taste is well worth it because it works."
|
| |
Branching Out from Bad Taste
Buckley's isn't the only health-related product on the market known for its unpleasant flavor, but it's arguably the most pure in its approach. The Listerine mouthwash brand carved out its niche for more than a century after its late-1800s launch by having a taste that made cod-liver oil seem like chocolate sauce by comparison. It has, however, been showing its kinder, gentler side in recent years.
This spring it launched Vanilla Mint Listerine, the seventh different flavor to reach the market since it first branched out from its original, um, recipe in the early 1990s. The others are FreshBurst, Cool Mint, Fluoride, Natural Citrus, and Advanced with Tartar Control.
"We've been launching products that have a less intense flavor," says Tanya Willer, brand manager for Listerine. "There are a number of consumers who previously haven't used Listerine because its intensity hasn't appealed to them."
The latest offering from the company is a "whitening pre-brush treatment." Unlike its sister products, which kill germs that cause gingivitis and plaque, this one contains hydrogen peroxide to help whiten teeth. It's a rinse designed to complement regular oral care routines.
"We launched it in response to the fact that consumers want whiter teeth," Willer says. "About 75 percent of them [feel that way] but only 20 percent of them will take the steps to do so," she adds, noting some of the hurdles for pursuing pearlier whites include the expense and the time commitment required.
She disputes any suggestion that Listerine is abandoning what made it famous and successful in the first place—the bad taste.
"Our trademark hasn't been the taste," she counters. "It's been about Listerine's therapeutic quality and the fact we kill germs that cause plaque, gingivitis, and bad breath. The fact that our flavor extensions over the last 15 years have been so successful means that we aren't pigeonholed into that original flavor. We've been able to successfully move beyond it."
That being said, the original flavor, which had been designed to be a disinfectant for surgical procedures, remains its third-best seller.
"We have a very loyal set of consumers who continue to use it," she says. "It's one of our strongest flavors. Even when a new product is introduced, those customers would never switch."
She adds that Listerine's message has evolved over the years from one focused on eradicating halitosis to one of overall oral care.
"All mouthwashes, at a minimum, need to fight bad breath," she says. "The thing that sets Listerine apart is the therapeutic benefit in killing germs. Fighting bad breath should be a given. If a mouthwash can't do that, it shouldn't even be in the game. A lot of people understand there are certain mouthwashes that will mask your bad breath. But it will come back unless you kill the germs that caused it."
Willer says Listerine has successfully launched a number of other oral products, including Listerine PocketPaks and Listerine PocketMist. The former, a dissolving breath strip, was introduced in 2000, while the latter, a breath spray, hit the market last year.
She says non-mouthwash products aren't too much of a stretch in consumers' eyes (and mouths). "They expect products that are in the oral care area from Listerine—a good-quality product, something that is efficacious and is going to clean their mouths."
Evolution of Flavor
Rob Warren, director of the Asper Centre for Entrepreneurship at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Canada, says the challenge facing orally administered products today is that the majority of consumers aren't interested in something that tastes horrible.
"We expect more," he says. "With the different formulations available, we think you can find ways to make the product a more pleasant experience."
Warren says Listerine is simply following the lead of dentists everywhere who have been trying for years to make visits to their chairs as enjoyable as possible. "Dentists are saying they're taking the pain out of visits. Listerine should be thinking, 'We should be doing something similar because we're part of the same process.' "
Buckley's, meanwhile, is playing the humor card in marketing its product while simultaneously tapping into the characteristics of historical cold and cough remedies, which never tasted good.
"It's a point of differentiation for them," Warren says. "It's a medical product, and medicine isn't supposed to taste like an orange drink. It's supposed to taste bad to kill the nasty virus in the back of your throat."
Despite Buckley's success throughout the years, Warren isn't sure it will be able to sustain its bad-tasting strategy. "I think eventually they'll have to change," he says. "The market today is really shifting—people just don't want anything unpleasant in their mouths. In 20 or 30 years, their [current] market will be gone. They'd want to start switching [to a better-tasting flavor] or they'll have nobody coming up [to replace the current market]."
And if that market disappears, the medicine required to remedy the situation will need more than a spoonful of sugar to work.
[11-Dec-2006]
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Renée Alexander is a freelance business and lifestyle writer based in Winnipeg, Canada.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Jul 31, 2006
|
Building Appeal -- Randall Frost
|
|
|
Part art, part science, the field of branding architecture has never been more relevant to firms around the world.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Mar 13, 2006
|
Standards: Who Needs Them? -- Edwin Colyer
|
|
|
By setting standards, organizations like ISO, EFQM, and Eco-label create a mark of distinction for brands to promote. But rules differ greatly between the groups on who gets to use the mark and how.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2010 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|
|