linked in facebook twitter rss

  • Interbrand
  • Brandchannel

your chance!
your chance!
also of interest...


  The Whole Package: Setting Healthy Standards   The Whole Package: Setting Healthy Standards  Dale Buss  
The Whole Package: Setting Healthy Standards That leaves big food and beverage companies—including PepsiCo, Kraft Foods, and Unilever—with an important dilemma: Do they continue to promote the proprietary better-for-you package-branding schemes that they've hatched—and in which they've invested millions of dollars—over the last few years? Or do they bow to what seems to be the will of the American consumer and come up with some better way to brand the nutritional superiority of foods?

The answer seems to be the latter. Already, has learned, PepsiCo stands ready to junk its two-year-old Smart Spot program altogether if the industry succeeds in creating a single, better-for-you icon that provides clarity to consumers. At least Kraft Foods and Unilever also have signaled their interest in creating and uniting behind such a standard.

"We're getting [support] and are committed to making this happen," says Antonio Lucio, chief innovations officer for health and wellness for PepsiCo. "If we're successful in this endeavor to consolidate iconography, we'll give up our Smart Spot."

"[Similarly,] we're interested in discussing a positive, at-a-glance approach [to package iconography], assuming it is helpful," says Elisabeth Wenner, a spokeswoman for Kraft, whose own proprietary symbol is called Sensible Solutions.

Adds Doug Balentine, director of nutrition and health for Unilever North America, his company believes "it's possible that an industry-wide standard would be beneficial—that we could harmonize around one set of principles and icons."

Ironically, when it comes to the issue of better-for-you icons, industry executives find themselves in far more agreement than usual with the "food police." In November the Center for Science in the Public Interest, the Washington, D.C.–based advocacy organization, formally petitioned the US Food & Drug Administration to design a national set of symbols to help consumers quickly identify healthier foods, alleging that "consumers can easily be confused or misled" by programs such as Smart Spot and Sensible Solutions "since the various programs have different aims and use inconsistent nutrition criteria."

Besides the comprehensive big-company brand marks, there are segment logos such as the Five A Day sticker that the Produce for Better Health Foundation has member companies slapping on fruits and vegetables, and limited-engagement icons such as the Get Apple Healthy tags that Mott's put on most of its products, such as applesauce, a couple of years ago.

Add to that the fact that perhaps the ultimate icon of healthier food choices—the US government's new food pyramid—is finally headed to supermarkets after two years of being confined largely to the Internet. The triangle-shaped, rainbow-colored guide for healthy eating will be promoted in 2,000 stores in 17 states initially.

Meanwhile, food shoppers in the UK are trying to avoid confusion over two rival, voluntary labeling schemes. One is a simplified, iconic "traffic-light" system devised by the government's Food Standards Agency, using red, amber, and green to show at a glance if a product contains high, medium, or low amounts of salt, fats, and sugar. (The other system, concocted mainly by large food and beverage companies, is less graphically oriented and more data-dense.)

It wasn't supposed to be this complicated. Many consumers conscientiously scour nutrition labels and other information on packaging for every tidbit of help in determining whether a product meets their standards. But many also are looking for brand-like devices that slash through the complexity and deliver a reliable, easy-to-understand verdict.

Plus, everyone says they want to help American shoppers make more healthful choices in the supermarket—more easily. That impulse would seem to dovetail nicely with the fact that mainstream food and beverage companies are shifting their entire portfolios toward better-for-you products and marketing because they sense that's the long-term direction of the American populace—despite the fact that obesity and poor nutrition still reign nationwide.

PepsiCo, for instance, has put the Smart Spot symbol—"Smart Choices Made Easy" in a green circle with a check mark—on more than 250 products across brand lines including Tropicana Pure Premium orange juices, Aquafina bottled waters, Gatorade, Baked! Lay's chips, Quaker Oats cereals, and Diet Pepsi. Each of the products meets nutritional criteria based on US Food & Drug Administration and National Academy of Sciences standards, including limits on the amounts of fat, cholesterol, sodium, and added sugar in the products.

Smart Spot has been an effective internal tool for PepsiCo divisions to measure progress against the company's intensifying shift to better-for-you products, Lucio says. And it actually works better as a focus of one-time in-store promotions than do sports tie-ins and other tactics.

Kraft has marked more than 500 of its better-for-you products with its Sensible Solutions logo and notes that these items accounted for 30 percent of US revenues in 2005. Wenner, the Kraft spokeswoman, says that the company plans to keep deploying the mini-brand on more products.

Similarly, Unilever is set to launch "Eat Smart" and "Drink Smart" logos in the US in the spring in part because a similar program, under its global My Choice initiative, already has proven effective in Europe. For its US launch, Unilever has been trying not only to learn from its six-month European experience with My Choice but also to adapt its better-for-you brand to the peculiarities of American consumers.

In Dutch, for instance, the My Choice symbol is translated, "I Choose Smart." Balentine says the wording reflects the fact that "the Dutch feel it's very important that it's 'my' choice, and it's how 'I' choose," Balentine explains. In the US, on the other hand, "Eat Smart" attracted consumers, according to research studies.

Also for the US market, Unilever added cholesterol levels as an important criterion for the icon. company also took into account American consumers' great trust in their own regulatory bodies and their unfamiliarity with—or even disdain for—international regulators; Balentine says, products qualifying for Eat Smart or Drink Smart logos will mention that the designation is based on "US dietary guidelines" instead of "international" guidelines.

Even some supermarkets are creating their own health-and-wellness brands. Hannaford Bros. has rolled out its Guiding Stars logo program through its 158 supermarkets in the Eastern United States. The Scarborough, Maine–based chain awards one to three stars to items throughout the store that range from a "good nutritional value" to a "best," depending on a variety of criteria.

Yet so far, all of these efforts have led only to a dizzying array of new "brands" that, while trying to inform consumers, mainly have served only to confuse them, despite the brands' best intentions. Smart Spot, Lucio admits, "hasn't been as successful creating a level of clarity with the consumer to help them understand and navigate through their purchase decisions. And now, everyone and their mother have created their own symbols."

"Our research—including more than 3,000 Hannaford customers—shows that our customers want to eat better, but are confused by the volume and complexity of nutrition information," adds Caren Epstein, a Hannaford spokeswoman.

The food police obviously agree. "The supermarket is teeming with competing 'healthy food' symbols that run the gamut from highly helpful to fatally flawed," says Center for Science in the Public Interest executive director Michael F. Jacobson. "Not everyone has the time or knowledge to scrutinize the nutrition facts labels or to decode the symbols Kraft, PepsiCo, General Mills, or other companies happen to be using."

And so do independent actors in the food business. "Consumers just don't trust large companies," says Gus Valen, chief executive officer of the Valen Group, an industry-consulting firm in Atlanta. " 'Healthier' is one thing, but these logos connote 'healthy.' The product choices aren't necessarily 'smart,' but they are 'smarter than an Oreo cookie.' That's breaking a promise to consumers, and they know that."

So what does everyone do now? Lucio's comments suggest that an industry consensus may be forming to create a universal better-for-you brand. Balentine says that Unilever would offer its own Eat Smart/Drink Smart logos for such an "open system," as the company did in Europe. Jacobson wants government involvement, he says, in creating "a prominent and reliable symbol on the fronts of packages [that] would be a tremendous help to those harried shoppers racing through the supermarket."

In any event, the industry should learn from the few examples of standard better-for-you icons that seem to be working so far. They include the US Department of Agriculture's organic certification mark, a circle that simply says "USDA Organic" and can be applied to any food or beverage that has passed federal-government standards for organic production.

"The organic icon works because there is consistency across categories and it's relatively universal," says Laurie Demeritt, president of the Hartman Group, a Bellevue, Washington–based industry-consulting firm.

Another successful icon is a "Whole Grains" logo that was originated by a Boston-based trade group and now appears on more than 1,000 products made by about 150 different companies. It seems to resonate with consumers because they are "eternally skeptical of anything that comes from the company itself," says Cynthia Harriman, director of food and nutrition strategies for Oldways, a Boston-based market-research and consulting firm that established the Whole Grains Council. "Any company's symbols are going to be self-serving, though they may be sincere."

On the other hand, Harriman says, surveys such as those recently undertaken by Council members Masterfoods USA (on behalf of its Uncle Ben's rice line) and bread maker Aunt Millie's show that the whole-grains stamp is more likely to make consumers purchase a product bearing it. "One reason the whole-grains stamp has been successful [is] because it's seen as a third-party standard," she says.

And if he's going to give up Smart Spot for an even broader "healthy" brand that would cover thousands of food and beverage products on American supermarket shelves, PepsiCo's Lucio wants to make sure that it hits the bull's-eye as well.

"We want it to be consistent," he says, "so that it doesn't create confusion, credible—both science- and government-endorsed—and consumer-friendly, to avoid any possible confusion and misunderstanding. It will be a major undertaking…but I fundamentally believe that consumers deserve better."     



Dale Buss is a journalist and editorial consultant in Rochester Hills, Michigan. He's a former reporter for The Wall Street Journal and writes about marketing and branding for a variety of publications.

 commenting closed Add Social Bookmark bookmark  print
 suggest topic  recommend ( 14 )  email

  brandchannel home archive   2013  |  2012  |  2011  |  2010  |  2009  |  2008  | 2007  |  2006  |  2005  |  2004  |  2003  |  2002  |  2001
Dec 31, 2007 Salsa Branding: Mild, Medium, or Hot? -- Randall Frost
  Why branding salsa is about roots and culture.
Dec 17, 2007 Why It's Better to Brand than Receive -- Edwin Colyer
  The give and take of humanitarian campaigns.
Dec 10, 2007 What's in Store for Private Labels? -- Preeti Khicha
  Retail labels and local brands battle for India’s pocketbook.
Dec 3, 2007 Delivering Overnight Brands -- Barry Silverstein
  Which brand owns the future of next day delivery?
Nov 26, 2007 Hershey’s Chocolate Dips into Foreign Markets -- Randall Frost
  How sweet is Hershey’s international appeal?
Nov 19, 2007 Tourists Re-Define Brand Patagonia -- Joe Ray
  Will Patagonia survive its own branding success?
Nov 12, 2007 Air Sick: Brands That No Longer Fly -- Barry Silverstein
  Do airline brands fly right with disgruntled customers?
Nov 5, 2007 Brands on a Mission -- Edwin Colyer
  Christian missionaries bring God and tricky brand awareness.
Oct 29, 2007 Dead Celebs: Branding Beyond the Grave -- Barry Silverstein
  How branding allows celebrities to live forever.
Oct 22, 2007 Welcome to the Pacific Northwest -- Randall Frost
  Does a friendly environment breed better customer service?
Oct 15, 2007 Coffee Break: South Africa’s Developing Taste -- Ron Irwin
  A battle among coffee brands is brewing in South Africa.
Oct 8, 2007 Building Brands in Rural India -- Preeti Khicha
  Branding efforts grow in the Indian countryside.
Oct 1, 2007 Pumping Energy into Gasoline Branding -- Barry Silverstein
  Is your favorite gas company running on empty?
Sep 24, 2007 Photofinishing Brands -- Jennifer Gidman
  Online photofinishing brands shoot for exposure.
Sep 17, 2007 Think Pink: Resurrecting Rosé -- Alycia de Mesa
  Will red and white wine consumers blush?
Sep 10, 2007 A Brand’s Worst Nightmare -- Barry Silverstein
  What happens when trusted products go bad?
Sep 3, 2007 Europe: A Branding Dichotomy -- Alycia de Mesa
  Branding Europe requires global and local expertise.
Aug 27, 2007 Luxury Brands Confront Web 2.0 -- Edwin Colyer
  No pampered life for luxury items on Web 2.0.
Aug 20, 2007 Is Wal-Mart a Brand Killer? -- Barry Silverstein
  Can Wal-Mart survive branding changes?
Aug 13, 2007 Is Africa Misbranded? -- Melissa Davis
  Can individual nations overcome their continent’s brand?
Aug 6, 2007 Branding for President -- Barry Silverstein
  On Election Day are we voting for people or brands?
Jul 30, 2007 Best Global Brands: How valuable is green? -- Robin Rusch
  BusinessWeek and Interbrand rank the 100 Best Global Brands. How meaningful are green initiatives to overall brand value?
Jul 23, 2007 True Colors of Nation Branding -- Alycia de Mesa
  Can a branding campaign change the world’s perception of countries with poor reputations?
Jul 16, 2007 Rich Donors Give Business Schools New Life -- Renée Alexander
  Philanthropists are re-branding Canadian business schools with their own reputations. Is this intelligent economics or egocentrism?
Jul 9, 2007 Raising the Chocolate Bar -- Joe Ray
  Like certain cheeses and wines, the chocolate from the Modica region fights threats to its brand integrity.
Jul 2, 2007 Humor: The Sixth Sense of Branding? -- Abram Sauer
  One of the most desirable traits people seek in each other is a sense of humor. Should we require the same from brands?
Jun 25, 2007 Don't Ignore the Boomer Consumer -- Alycia de Mesa
  When it comes to targeting demographics by age, brands best listen to their elders.
Jun 18, 2007 The Fanatic: A Brand's Best Friend? -- Edwin Colyer
  Brand ambassadors provide free publicity for your brand. But what happens when you no longer control the message.
Jun 11, 2007 Online Luxury for the Masses -- Alycia de Mesa
  By offering their products online, do luxury brands diminish their exclusivity?
Jun 4, 2007 Where Are the “Muslim” Brands? -- Randall Frost
  Is it possible to build and develop a global brand that appeals to a Muslim audience?
May 28, 2007 Best of Both Worlds? -- Barry Silverstein
  When it comes to alliances and partnerships, two heads—that is, two brands—are not always better than one.
May 21, 2007 Peanut-Free Marketing -- Renée Alexander
  Will stronger measures to eliminate nuts from their products. Will this help develop a new food category?
May 14, 2007 Sicilian Branding Preservatives -- Joe Ray
  As a brand, the island of Sicily lacks a specific identity. A recently formed group of people seeks to rectify the problem.
May 7, 2007 Brand-Sponsored Endowments -- Alycia de Mesa
  Consumer brands creep into the names of professorships and buildings at US colleges.
Apr 30, 2007 Cheap Flights Soar in South Africa -- Ron Irwin
  Thanks to low-cost carriers (LCCs) shaking up the South African airline industry, many locals will skip the bus for the plane.
Apr 23, 2007 Can IKEA's Dominance Be Disassembled? -- Edwin Colyer
  Two Scandinavian furniture-retail brands. Four letters each. Two matching letters. Two different brand strategies.
Apr 16, 2007 Good Reception: Managing Mobile Customers -- Tim Fielding
  The crowded field of "wireless brands" includes cellphone manufacturers, service providers, ringtone creators, and content developers. How does that affect the customer relationship?
Apr 9, 2007 Lunch Lessons in Branding -- Dale Buss
  Foodservice brands face challenges including administrators' concerns and students' appetites—as well as the bottom line.
Apr 2, 2007 Brand America: Taming wild perceptions -- Randall Frost
  The myth of the Old West was once tied to the US brand. Has 21st-century pessimism replaced 19th-century ideas of freedom and justice?
Mar 26, 2007 Wikipedia: In brand we trust? -- Alycia de Mesa
  The strength of Wikipedia is its ability to be shaped by any user. But is that also its weakness?
Mar 19, 2007 Branding With No Reservations -- Barry Silverstein
  Is the proliferation of hotel brands and brand extensions creating convenience—or confusion?
Mar 12, 2007 Virtual-World Branding: For Real? -- Alycia de Mesa
  Second Life,, and Cyworld offer a virtual-world community with real-world branding opportunities.
Mar 5, 2007 Bouillabaisse: O-fish-al branding? -- Joe Ray
  Can chefs protect the integrity of their bouillabaisse "brand" against cheaper, low-quality versions, or are they really in the soup?
Feb 26, 2007 London 2012: An Olympian branding feat -- Edwin Colyer
  As memories of the 2006 terrorist attacks in London still linger, branding the city in anticipation of the 2012 Summer Games requires gold-medal effort.
Feb 19, 2007 brandchannel's 2006 Product Placement Awards -- Abram Sauer
  We scour the Number One films appearing in US theaters for the most (and most innovative) brand appearances.
Feb 12, 2007 A Branding New Year -- Alycia de Mesa
  Several branding experts share their predictions for 2007.
Feb 5, 2007 Special Brands for Special Needs -- Vivian Manning-Schaffel
  Brands seeking a wider audience should look no further than the special-needs market.
Jan 29, 2007 Similar Search Results: Google Wins -- Anthony Zumpano
  The results are in for the 2006 Readers' Choice Awards for brand of the year.
Jan 15, 2007 Chain Stores: Welcome to the neighborhood -- Alicia Clegg
  When expanding into new locations, should brands respect the existing environment and culture?
Jan 8, 2007 China: Dressed for Global Success? -- Randall Frost
  Chinese garment and textile manufacturers try to tailor a new reputation: quality on par with Western brands.
Jan 1, 2007 Brands Navigate the Blogosphere -- Abram Sauer
  The proliferation of blogs means everyone is potentially a critic—and can share his criticism with the whole world. How should a brand react?