|
|
| |
|
| |
The 2008 presidential candidates will have plenty of time to build their personal brands—and they have at their disposal powerful social networking tools to do it. While the Internet played a key role in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections, it has become nothing short of a strategic weapon in the 2008 race. Of course, all the major candidates have websites and blogs, but they have also launched MySpace pages and posted videos on YouTube’s political “channel”; in fact, Democratic candidate John Edwards was the earliest on YouTube (March 2006).
Remember the historic role television played in the 1960 Kennedy-Nixon campaign? Well, it is the Internet that now brings a whole new up-close-and-personal dimension to presidential campaigning. The consumer can watch online videos of candidates, participate in discussion boards, and e-mail questions and comments.
Unfortunately, freedom of expression means that some candidates can be easily undermined by the very same interactive medium. In March 2007, for example, a knock-off of a classic Apple television commercial that depicted “big brother” on a giant screen was re-created starring Hillary Clinton. It is this kind of instant online sabotage that makes crafting and controlling modern-day political brands so difficult.
Nonetheless, the Internet is becoming the branding medium of choice for presidential hopefuls. Hillary Clinton announced her candidacy on her website. Barack Obama has launched a personalized version of his website, “MyBarackObama,” which supporters can use to create their own profiles, network with friends, write blogs, and plan events.
Obama has pursued a unified branding strategy that permeates his entire campaign. It is anchored by a modern, sophisticated logo: a bold “O” cleverly comprised of colors and elements of the American flag. It is as slick as any consumer brand packaging in the market. You will see it displayed on signage, at events, in advertising, and on Obama’s website.
Other candidates have not overlooked the importance of the graphic image. The Clinton campaign clearly made a conscious decision to stay away from “Clinton for President,” choosing “Hillary for President” instead. “Hillary” appears in large serif type, white on a blue background, with a wavy red, white and blue banner beneath it. (That banner is subtly reminiscent of husband Bill’s campaign graphic in his first run for the White House.) John Edwards goes for a clean look with a contemporary flair in his logotype. “JOHN” and “08” appear in red sans serif bold type, while “EDWARDS” is done in blue. A small blue star with a green tail finishes it off.
|
| |
|
On the Republican side, the look for Rudy Giuliani is simple: RUDY in white letters on a blue field with a red box around it. It could be promoting a candidate… or a candy bar. The Mitt Romney website features a photo of Romney against an American flag background with MITT ROMNEY in white serif type underlined in red. John McCain’s graphic image is decidedly different. The name McCAIN is done in white against a black background. Above it is a single military-looking star with yellow graphic epaulets to either side. Stark and strong, it could be a logo for General Patton.
Ultimately, though, branding the candidates involves far more than graphic imagery, YouTube videos, or “sticky” websites. A candidate’s brand is, at its heart, who the individual is and what he or she stands for, believes in, and projects.
In that department, candidates are already defining themselves. For example, Edwards made headlines when he and wife Elizabeth announced in March 2007 that Elizabeth’s cancer had returned but they would continue their campaign. Supporters viewed this as courageous, while detractors claimed it was inappropriate. McCain created a flap in April 2007 when he came out strongly in favor of the war in Iraq. Supporters viewed this as courageous, while detractors claimed it was inappropriate. Well, you get the idea.
Meanwhile, Democrat Obama is surprising Clinton with his strong showing, while Republicans are wondering if Tennessean Fred Thompson of “Law and Order” fame or former Clinton nemesis Newt Gingrich will enter the race.
The bottom line is a winning candidate must find common ground and make an emotional connection with voters. According to Carla Marinucci, writing in the San Francisco Chronicle, this is how California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger won re-election: “… dismissed by voters as a divisive conservative in 2005—[he] successfully repositioned himself as the environmentally friendly centrist in his re-election campaign. With his revamped ‘Schwarzenegger’ logo, fresh orange and green campaign colors, and the new ‘Protecting the California Dream’ slogan, the governor sailed to a double-digit victory last November in a Democratic state.”
When the dust of the early 2008 primaries clears, one candidate for each party will remain standing. Then we will see which “brand” American voters decide to buy in November 2008.
[6-Aug-2007]
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Barry Silverstein has been a frequent brandchannel contributor since 2007. He has thirty years of advertising and marketing experience and is currently a freelance writer and marketing consultant. He founded and ran his own direct marketing agency and held executive positions with Epsilon, a leading database marketing firm and Arnold, a major ad agency. Silverstein is the author of three marketing books, including the McGraw-Hill book, The Breakaway Brand, which he co-authored with Arnold CEO Fran Kelly.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2013 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|
|