linked in facebook twitter rss

  • Interbrand
  • Brandchannel

your chance!
your chance!
also of interest...
 
 
 
 

 

  Family-owned Brands: A Sustainable Legacy?   Family-owned Brands: A Sustainable Legacy?  Randall Frost  
         
 
Family-owned Brands: A Sustainable Legacy? In the US—a relatively young nation—most family-owned companies are controlled by first and second generation family members. But elsewhere in the world, many family businesses have been owned by the same family for hundreds of years. Les Henokiens—an elite club of family businesses that only allows membership to companies that have been in a family for at least 200 years—currently has 38 members. Fifteen are Italian, 10 are French, four are German, one is Dutch, four are Japanese, one is Belgian, two are Swiss, and one is located in Northern Ireland
 
According to Barbara Spector, editor-in-chief of Family Business Magazine, the world’s oldest family business (founded in 718) is Houshi Onsen in Komatsu, Japan. Says Spector, “Family enterprises are the backbone of the economy in virtually every nation, and indeed, the world’s oldest family companies have outlasted many national governments.”

The Appeal of Family Brands

Customers frequently perceive family-owned brands as emblems of success and prestige, but this is also because these brands lend themselves to trust. The family name, when used as a brand, serves to reassure the customer. Toyota and Peugeot, for example, have strong brand identities that consumers believe in.

Says Professor Harold James of Princeton University, “Why does Wilkin and Sons—the British jam purveyor—tell you on the underside of the lid, which you can only see when you have bought the product, how many generations they have been in family ownership? This is presumably seen as creating trust, or as a pledge of quality.”

Barbara Spector, for her part, feels that family brands appeal to consumers because they stand for tradition and continuity. “They have a personal identity attached to the name,” she says. “That’s why ad campaigns like ‘S.C. Johnson: A family company’ and the old ads for Wendy’s featuring the late founder, Dave Thomas, have been so successful—and why the newer Wendy’s ads, which veered away from the founder’s vision, have been a bust.”

Passing on the Brand

Founders of family-owned firms tend to be vigorous, innovative individuals. As the creators of new products or markets, they also are prone to view business with long-term vision. But by the second and third generations, their companies may be torn by conflicts between family members, a divergence of individual interests, and a focus on short-term goals. When it comes time to pass the brand to the next generation, the sorts of intrigues and in-fighting reminiscent of a Shakespearean tragedy may come into play.

Thomas Mann’s novel Buddenbrooks traces the rise and fall of a prototypical European family firm. The founder of the family dynasty is relentlessly driven and focused. His son, while capable, proves to be uninspired. The grandson is more focused on his own interests than the firm’s, while the great-grandson’s chief ambition proves to be the dissipation of the family fortune.

According to T.R. Rajan, a management consultant based in Chennai, India, the Buddenbrooks syndrome has its equivalents in many cultures and is seen even outside businesses. “In India,” he says, “we describe the four generation cycle as 'Poor-Miser-Rich-Spendthrift!'”

Nevertheless, Rajan says, many family firms have been highly successful in India. “Barring a few, such as Larsen & Toubro and Infosys,” he explains, “almost all of the business houses that have made great strides in Indian industry are family-managed, in the sense the man at the top is a member of the family that founded the business. And they are very efficiently managed.” Two that come to mind are the Tata Group, founded in 1868, and the global steelmaker Arcelor Mittal.

But even when the family business is successfully passed on to the next generation, there may be a loss of family coherence as the heirs assume control of the company. The corporate culture eventually derives more from the core business than from family ownership. Meanwhile, a brand identity evolves that is quite distinct from that of the family.

And then, as the firm grows, it may become difficult to find within the family the expertise needed to run it. Often a professional manager is brought in. But professional managers are less likely than family members to be passionate about the business. In addition, professional managers must be monitored to ensure they focus on the interests of the company’s owners and not their own.

With the passing of each successive generation, the gap between ownership and management tends to widen, and the idea of selling the company may become more attractive. According to Teresa da Silva Lopes, writing in Global Brands, family businesses excel at creating enduring brands—especially in sectors such as alcoholic beverages and cosmetics—but public companies are better at developing them.

 
National Differences

In his book Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Francis Fukuyama describes three forms of economic organization—the family business; the professionally managed corporation; and the state-owned or state–sponsored enterprise. These, he says, have their origins in family and kinship, voluntary associations outside of kinship, and the state.

Fukuyama also notes that societies that have very strong families but relatively weak bonds of social trust—for example, trust among people unrelated to one another—tend to be dominated by small, family-owned and managed businesses. According to Fukuyama, some countries, notably France, Spain, Italy, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and the People’s Republic of China, and a number of nations in Latin America, have strong families and a strong state, but relatively little social structure in between the two forces.

Fukuyama contrasts these countries with the US, Germany, and Japan, where large, professionally managed corporations were quick to develop. He argued that these cultures possessed the characteristics required to move beyond the family and into voluntary social groups that were not based on kinship. The world’s best known brands, he noted, tend to come from countries that are good at creating large organizations.

Global Trends

Will globalization lead to more or fewer family-owned brands? Francis Fukuyama’s study is reminiscent of an essay that the British anthropologist Keith Hart wrote nearly a decade earlier. Hart argued that social trust may not be the most efficient basis for economic relationships in societies undergoing major economic change. This is because agreements based on personal trust or formal contracts are subject to stronger sanctions than agreements based on social trust.

Professor Joe Astrachan of Georgia’s Kennesaw State University sees in this analysis a favorable prognosis for family businesses. “When markets break down, government becomes untrustworthy and legal systems [become] lethargic. Family trust becomes more important.” He adds, “Family brands will become more important as they can assure trust across cultures and political regimes. This will be particularly true for products and services designed for health, food and enjoyment.”

But family-owned brands may suffer from their own limitations. Professor Harold James argued in Family Capital that the greatest problem facing family firms is their tendency to think in national rather than global terms. Family firms have often been reluctant to borrow money for business expansion, reflecting a reluctance to share family secrets or see the family’s control of the company watered down. At the same time, taking a privately owned company public, while keeping the majority of shares within the family, may make it difficult to preserve brand identity.

Professor John A. Davis, Faculty Chair, Families in Business Program, at Harvard Business School, says, “Right now, it’s difficult to say how globalization will impact family companies; there are many paths to globalize your business, some straining families and companies more than others. But there is a significant chance that globalization will greatly reduce the number of companies—mostly mid-tier—that can play this new game.”

Barbara Spector, while taking note of such on-going trends as InBev’s recent bid for family-owned Anheuser-Busch, is of the opinion that the strongest family brands will thrive amid global competition. As examples, she cites the success of India’s Tata Group and Arcelor Mittal.

Regardless of the economic futures and fates of family brands, the actual families behind the brands are subject to the same triumphs and tragedies in life—just like families everywhere.

Perhaps that is why consumers—a demographic comprised of parents, children, and cousins—relate to family brands so well.    

[1-Sep-2008]

 
  
  

Randall Frost is a freelance writer based in Pleasanton, California. He is the author of The Globalization of Trade. His work has appeared in Worth, The New England Financial Journal, CBSHealthWatch, and a variety of educational publications.

     
 commenting closed Add Social Bookmark bookmark  print
 suggest topic  recommend ( 61 )  email

Family-owned Brands: A Sustainable Legacy?
 
 Interesting article and there are some other family owned brands that stand out as strong examples. One being Salvatore Ferragamo which is solely owned by the Ferragamo family of Italy. This is a phenominal example of a brand built on trust, reputation, strength and quality. The family of Salvatore stills owns and operates the brand to this day. With rumour or going public in the next two years, it will be interesting to see what happens to this tight little 'luxury' ship as it battles the world of power struggles, venture capitalism and brand domination. 
Brian Fox, Warner Bros. - September 2, 2008
 
 Great analysis and facts!!! 
KARD, Brand and Design Manager, KARDesign - September 8, 2008
 
  brandchannel home archive   2013  |  2012  |  2011  |  2010  |  2009  | 2008  |  2007  |  2006  |  2005  |  2004  |  2003  |  2002  |  2001
 
 
Dec 22, 2008 Brand Darwinism: When & Why Brands Falter & Die
  Where brands go when they die.
   
 
Dec 15, 2008 M.H. Alshaya Co.: Paving the Way in Emerging Markets -- Mya Frazier
  Alshaya offers brands direction in the Middle East.
   
 
Dec 8, 2008 Branding by the Nose in Brazil -- Ana Paula Palombo Terzi
  Brazilian brands take a nose dive.
   
 
Dec 1, 2008 Wines: Is ''Made in France'' Enough? -- Joe Ray
  French wine brands pour on uniqueness.
   
 
Nov 24, 2008 German Engineering Drives Global Brand Success -- Barry Silverstein
  How German brands deliver discipline and quality.
   
 
Nov 17, 2008 The Squeeze on Ketchup -- Jennifer Gidman
  Will other brands ketchup with Heinz?
   
 
Nov 10, 2008 Abu Dhabi: A City Rich in Branding -- Mya Frazier
  The brand strategy behind the world's richest city.
   
 
Nov 3, 2008 Church Brands See the Light of Branding -- Kimberly Maul
  Church Brands Sing the Praises of Differentiation
   
 
Oct 27, 2008 Brands in a League of Their Own -- Barry Silverstein
  Ivy League Schools Teach Brand Awareness
   
 
Oct 20, 2008 A New Packaged Milk Brand Flows into Pakistan -- Umair Naeem
  Are Pakistani Consumers Milking the Competition?
   
 
Oct 13, 2008 Gay Consumers in the Market for Respect -- Mya Frazier
  Brands that stereotype the gay demographic reap shallow results.
   
 
Oct 6, 2008 Rating Nation Brands: What Really Counts? -- Randall Frost
  Determine the true hierarchy of nation brands.
   
 
Sep 29, 2008 Value Store Brands: High-end Taste for Low Spenders -- Barry Silverstein
  Do consumers like to get dressed up when times are down?
   
 
Sep 22, 2008 Best Global Brands: Lessons Learned -- Jim Thompson
  Meet the top 100 in Interbrand's 2008 Best Global Brands report.
   
 
Sep 15, 2008 Do Hockey and Soccer Mom Brands Share Goals? -- Abram Sauer
  The sport of branding hockey and soccer moms.
   
 
Sep 8, 2008 Coffee Brands: Wake Up and Smell the Morality -- Mya Frazier
  Are green coffee brands saving the planet or themselves?
   
 
Aug 25, 2008 More Than a Name: Japanese Super-brands Diversify -- Barry Silverstein
  Do Japanese super-brands overextend themselves?
   
 
Aug 18, 2008 2008 brandcameo's Product Placement Awards -- Abram Sauer
  The best and worst of product placement in films this year.
   
 
Aug 11, 2008 Emerging Nations Cultivate Agricultural Brands -- Randall Frost
  Are farm products from emerging nations growing on consumers?
   
 
Aug 4, 2008 India Turns Up the Volume on Sonic Branding -- Preeti Khicha
  Why sonic branding speaks to Indian consumers.
   
 
Jul 28, 2008 Preview to the 2008 brandcameo Product Placement Awards -- Abram Sauer
  Keeping track of brands on the big screen.
   
 
Jul 21, 2008 Why the Climate is Ripe for Chilean Wine Brands -- Joe Ray
  Chilean wines uncork robust branding strategies.
   
 
Jul 14, 2008 Toy Brands Don’t Play Around in Virtual Worlds -- Alycia de Mesa
  Why toy companies want to kid with avatars.
   
 
Jul 7, 2008 Pets: Part of the Brand Family -- Barry Silverstein
  Why upscale pet brands are getting a leg up
   
 
Jun 30, 2008 High Interest in Branding Credit Cards -- Jennifer Gidman
  Do these brands represent your spending values?
   
 
Jun 23, 2008 New England's Thoreau-ly Inspired Brands -- Randall Frost
  New England brands with transcendental roots.
   
 
Jun 16, 2008 Mobile Brands Connect with Pakistan -- Umair Naeem
  Cellular services companies come calling in Pakistan
   
 
Jun 9, 2008 The Deal with Online Travel Brands -- Jennifer Gidman
  Reaching destinations begins with an online journey
   
 
Jun 2, 2008 A Healthy Supply of Green -- Vivian Manning-Schaffel
  How to go green and mean it.
   
 
May 26, 2008 US Beef: Well Done Branding? -- Randall Frost
  The US cattle industry beefs up branding efforts
   
 
May 19, 2008 Will China's Brand Medal in the Olympics? -- Melissa Davis
  Does China's brand have a sporting chance?
   
 
May 12, 2008 Older and Wiser: How Brands Stand the Test of Time -- Barry Silverstein
  On the battlefield of branding, only the bad die young
   
 
May 5, 2008 Celebrity Chefs: Brands that Cook in the Kitchen -- Barry Silverstein
  Chefs bake their own brands.
   
 
Apr 28, 2008 Grading Green: The Watchdogs CMOs Must Appease -- Mya Frazier
  A new sheen to evaluating green.
   
 
Apr 21, 2008 The Caribbean's Rum-Soaked Brand -- Randall Frost
  Branding the Caribbean is no vacation.
   
 
Apr 14, 2008 Bowling for Cricket Brands -- Preeti Chaturvedi
  Branding Cricket a High Stakes Game
   
 
Apr 7, 2008 A Concentrated Dose of the Brandjunkie Results -- Jim Thompson
  The results from our end.
   
 
Mar 31, 2008 Brandjunkies on the Influence of Brands:
The 2008 Brandjunkie Survey Results -- Jim Thompson
  Brandjunkies speak their minds!
   
 
Mar 24, 2008 Brand Progression in a Recession -- Barry Silverstein
  Brands must be themselves to survive.
   
 
Mar 17, 2008 French Luxury Brands, A Modern Day Classic -- Chauncey Zalkin
  Luxury brands in an uncomfortable position.
   
 
Mar 10, 2008 UK Brands Skip Across the Pond -- Kimberly Maul
  British brands cross the pond and cultures.
   
 
Mar 3, 2008 Consumers Go Ga-Ga Over Organic -- Barry Silverstein
  Why organic baby food is a natural fit with parents
   
 
Feb 18, 2008 Brand Wonder Down Under -- Jennifer Gidman
  Why down under is looking up.
   
 
Feb 11, 2008 Customized Branding: Consumers Get Creative Control -- Barry Silverstein
  Branding gets personal with consumer input.
   
 
Feb 4, 2008 Greenwashing: A Dirty Job? -- Wendy Jedlicka
  Will greenwashing ever come clean?
   
 
Jan 28, 2008 Brands Line Up for Super Bowl XLII -- Barry Silverstein
  Brands see themselves in the Super Bowl.
   
 
Jan 21, 2008 The Corn Belt: Farmers All Ears to Branding? -- Randall Frost
  Branding the Corn Belt is a matter of taste
   
 
Jan 14, 2008 Dunkin Donuts: An International Brand for Average Joes -- Vivian Manning-Schaffel
  Dunkin' Donuts wants those on the go to stick around
   
 
Jan 7, 2008 TCIG: The Pride of Brand Ownership -- Renée Alexander
  Can local cultures brand their way to international success?