|
|
| |
|
| |
In Britain alone, 38 million text messages are exchanged each day compared to 21 million a year ago November, according to Britain's Mobile Data Association. As for Asia, Mobile Streams estimates that approximately 5.6 billion messages are sent yearly (as of October 2001).
Despite the fact that the industry is in its preliminary stage of development, major brands such as Coca-Cola, Nike, IBM, McDonald's, and Blockbuster have begun exploiting the immediacy and interactivity of wireless services to promote and further shape their brands.
For example, Coca-Cola introduced a new brand called Qoo, via SMS in Singapore. The brand targets teenagers through 500 advertisements featuring an animated Qoo character – sort of a blue one-eared version of Hello Kitty. Within nine weeks, the ad reached 500,000 mobile users and Qoo apparently became the No. 1 juice in Singapore. SMS was the medium of choice for this particular campaign because traditional channels such as television were viewed as less effective for younger consumers.
Another more commonly used model to date is sponsorship. Matt Kaiser, Director of Consumer Data Marketing for Cingular observed that, in the US, the television program CBS Sportsline has implemented sponsorship for information alerts. For example, the delivery of sports scores might be accompanied by a sponsorship message announcing "brought to you by Nike."
The greatest advantage to SMS, according to Linsay Watt, Senior Consultant for Cap Gemini Ernst & Young in the UK, is the push versus pull strategy. Messaging services can be “pushed anytime and anywhere (one doesn’t need to go to the TV and turn it on, rather one could pass by the Gap and receive an ad).”
Text messaging is no doubt cost effective, particularly when advertisers can target their messages to specific communities with demographics that are complementary to their products or services. However, wireless branding is limited particularly in its current stage of development. SMS as a medium for branding offers restricted space (only 160 characters per message) and capabilities for text content only, thus lacking the visual and aural tools to fully deliver a brand's message. Therefore, brands that are not already well-known by name are unlikely to find it worthwhile to use mobile messaging for marketing until service offerings are further developed.
|
| |
|
In the future Enhanced Messaging Services (EMS) and Multimedia Messaging Services (MMS) will enable the use of video and enhanced interactivity. However, Joe Laszlo, Senior Analyst at Jupiter Media Metrix, predicts that full deployment and use of these services is unlikely to take place until another two years down the road.
Although, few studies have been conducted on the current use of SMS in traditional sectors as a marketing platform specifically, Laszlo pointed out that the next stage of development for commercial messages will entail requests from the consumer for specific information. Key areas where such services are taking off include financial services (firms can provide information services to manage portfolios) and travel (airlines will provide flight information).
However, Kaiser noted that providers such as Cingular are “still trying to determine what the wireless standards are in the US for advertising. The carriers in the US are still at the front end of how to set up relationships in terms of giving outside [companies] connectivity to customers.” Jill Meidbury, Senior Manager for Corporate Communications at Deutsche Telekom noted that there is currently only 40% penetration in the US for mobile services. The use of mobile services as a whole is more imbedded in the European and Asia-Pacific lifestyles. According to Watt, there is only one voice call for every ten to fifteen SMS messages in the Asia-Pacific region.
The untapped potential for mobile marketing in the US is due in large part to technology, pricing and penetration of communications.
Experts across the board agree that technology is the main hindrance to development of mobile messaging in the US. While Europe's market is standardized on the GSM network, the US suffers from a mixture of standards and hence lacks interoperability.
As for pricing, wireline and wireless services in the US and European markets have different pricing models. As Kaiser explains, landline services in Europe are paid on a per usage basis versus a flat rate in the US. Voice is therefore relatively more expensive in Europe making SMS a more competitive means for communication.
As for penetration of communications platforms, Kasier pointed out that the European market does not have traditional paging companies or the level of PC and online penetration as the US, therefore allowing SMS to take off more quickly. Users in the US are very loyal to their PCs, and hence are spoiled by the availability of a large screen and full keyboard, neither of which a mobile phone or PDA can offer. What’s more, users in the US on average still view the mobile phone simply as a voice device, rather than an "integrative device."
Although Europe is way ahead of the US in the implementation and usage of wireless services as a whole, Jupiter Media Metrix reported that advertisers in Europe will spend under 0.7 percent of overall ad spending (less than 680M euros/US$ 615M) on wireless marketing in 2006. That said, the majority of the 60 million euros (US$ 53M) spent on wireless marketing in Europe in 2001 will go to direct marketing via SMS.
SMS, or mobile messaging as a whole, is still in its infant stage and many experts are unclear about its potential. Kim Thompson, spokesperson for Voicestream, notes that the use of SMS will expand through the introduction of IM (AOL already has over 100 million IM users who are familiar with the concept), and no doubt there are more messaging possibilities in the works.
Until the industry becomes more standardized, and technologies are both adapted and adopted for use, advertisers need to consider how their brands translate within the current limitations. In the meantime, users should work on their emoticons and search out dictionaries for mobile shorthand. [31-Dec-2001]
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Kim Barnet worked as a consultant in risk management at Claydon Gescher Associates in Beijing for the past four years. She recently moved to New York and is currently seeking new job opportunities.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Aug 20, 2001
|
Brand on the Horizon -- Ron Irwin
|
|
|
Kellogg may be number two in the cereal wars with General Mills, but as Avis taught us, being number two sometimes means trying harder.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Jul 2, 2001
|
Sick of Ads? -- Nick Thornton
|
|
|
The Italians and Canadians are breaking new ground in the quest for acceptable ad space. But is a hospital a healthy place to build your brand?
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Jun 25, 2001
|
Brands Get the Blame -- Ian Cocoran
|
|
|
Is all publicity good publicity? Studies show that people do buy with their conscience, and brand owners are proactively starting to take notice.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Apr 9, 2001
|
A 'Real' Steal -- Edward Young
|
|
|
Intellectual property protection is becoming big business in China where no brand is safe from replication.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Mar 5, 2001
|
Smoke & Mirrors -- Nick Thornton
|
|
|
Are tobacco transnationlists sinners or saints? Your view may depend on the tobacco marketing laws in your country.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2013 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|
|