linked in facebook twitter rss

  • Interbrand
  • Brandchannel

your chance!
your chance!
no name - who?
Also of interest...

No Name

  no name
by Reneé Alexander
April 6, 2009

Even though it’s been on grocery store shelves for three decades, Loblaw Companies Ltd. is confident its no name brand is nowhere near its expiry date.

The Toronto-based grocery giant recently relaunched the iconic brand and its unmistakeable plain black printing on yellow packaging. Company officials say the move was made to coincide with no name’s 30th birthday, and refocusing on a no-frills value brand at a time when the economy is in freefall is obviously prudent.

Three hundred products were repackaged during the first six weeks of the year—items such as bathroom tissue, macaroni and cheese, peanut butter, ketchup and canned tomato sauce—and another 2,600, including pet food, paper plates and cereals, will be recast in the old-is-new-again packaging throughout the rest of 2009. (When no name was first born, it had just 16 products.)

“Imagine going down a grocery aisle. There are so many colours. You’ll be able to spot no name almost immediately,” says David Primorac, Loblaw’s senior director of public relations. “We chose products that would be best suited to the economic conditions. We wanted to start with pantry items, everyday items.”

He says no name’s packaging changes every few years, and the company’s marketing department decided the time was right to go retro.

“We wanted to bring back the original color palette. It’s something recognizable and it’s easy for consumers. We’ve created a bit of a buzz around the packaging,” he says.

The brand has always been associated with the color yellow, and all packaging is primarily that color complemented by a simple graphical layout. Over the years, the packaging has become more detailed, utilizing a no name logo and photography of the product.

The company’s campaign includes advertisements starring CEO Galen Weston Jr. touting the money that can be saved by replacing national brands with no name ones in your shopping cart.

“We’re saying, ‘if you need to control your monthly expenses, you can do it on your grocery bill. Look to no name, you’ll find similar quality products that will save you money,’” he says, noting a shopping cart of no name products is about 20 percent cheaper than a cart of corresponding national brands.

“It’s also a call-out to our customers. We’re saying these are great, quality products. Why don’t you revisit what is considered the original economy powerhouse brand?”

Primorac says no name is being targeted to, well, pretty much everybody.

“People are price conscious, it doesn’t matter what their demographic or income level is. They’re paying attention to the financial situation in their own home. People who bought no name when it first came out, we think they’ll buy it again,” he says.

Loblaw is putting its money where its mouth is by offering a money-back guarantee on all no name products if customers aren’t satisfied with their quality.

Loblaw doesn’t release the recent marketshare figures of no name, but it’s generally considered to be between 10 and 20 percent of its sales. To give an indication of no name’s strength, one study showed Pampers used to have 85 percent market share before no name’s brand of diapers were launched. With the private label diapers on the scene, that number plummeted to 18 percent.

Raj Manchanda, a marketing professor at the I.H. Asper School of Business at the University of Manitoba, says many consumers will be willing to trade “down” to no name on products where there isn’t a lot of differentiation with national brands, such as pasta sauce, ketchup or dog food.

The funny thing is, many leadings brands and their generic versions are made by the same manufacturer, he says.

“Consumers may firmly believe (a particular) brand of dog food is the best because that’s the perception that has been created through marketing,” he says. “When price becomes so important, you’re willing to say, ‘maybe there isn’t any difference between apple juices.’”

Manchanda says he likes Loblaw’s strategy of adding a little bit of excitement and a retro vibe to the shopping process.

“Even though it’s not the most exciting packaging, it still breaks through the clutter and gets your attention. It reminds people about a value proposition,” he says.

Manchanda says no name carries some significant cachet with consumers because they believe its products sell at the lowest price possible. No name won’t, however, have the same kind of brand proposition with higher-end products, such as perfume, because of the image consumers want to convey.

“We buy perfume because it’s how we express ourselves and feel about ourselves. We’re making a personal statement,” he says.

Surprisingly enough, there may even be some snob appeal to no name products for consumers who want to be perceived as savvy shoppers.

“One of the reasons consumers use coupons isn’t just the savings but because they feel they’re smart and getting better prices than others. There could very well be an element of that (with no name),” Manchanda says.


Renée Alexander is a freelance business and lifestyle writer based in Winnipeg, Canada.

 commenting closed Add Social Bookmark bookmark  print
 suggest topic  recommend ( 25 )  email

no name - who?
 Hi Renee,While I see the trend of private label I don't agree that no frills packaging is enough to do the trick. One has only to look at Walmart and Target's private label to understand that these brands are also trying to deliver an experience beyond value that makes it worth picking up off the shelf in lean times. 
michelle vasquez, Free lance brand strategist - April 6, 2009
 A no name brand provide no protection against third party copies, especially since the brand in this case is descriptive of the fact that there is no name. It is surprising to me that this can be cited as a strong example of branding - this is precisely how NOT to use a brand. If this "brand" is successful, competitors can simply come to market with similar or identical NO NAME products, and there would be little that no name could do to push them away. Why would one do this out of the gate? The brand owner here is misguided in its attempt to build equity in essentially nothing.In contrast, TARGET ensures that its generic goods have the TARGET and TARGET LOGO on each product, thus ensuring that brand equity is captured in its house brand. 
Kenneth Ng, Attorney - April 6, 2009
 The only real driver for No Name is "PRICE", and there is always someone somewhere willing to go cheaper. The key is channel and distribution. Retailers will inevitability own these middle to lower segments as they control the shelf space. Globally house brands are moving up to the middle ground offering more than just price, they now offer quality cues, and value "no name" propositions are getting launched as unique price fighters against their direct competition. 
Colin Downing, Strategic Director, Redfire Design - April 6, 2009
 i agree with the above comments. capitalising on price as a USP is pretty detrimental strategy. Achieving this reap a considerable amount of market share in the short run, which is vital in the current economic climate.No Name might be trying to capitalise on the surface, Price as its USP but i feel the actual capitalising is on the packaging/label in which it stands for no frills with equal two cents worth. 
Raziel Warrington, full time brand junkie - April 7, 2009
 There's something smug about the whole no name concept. It's like they're saying because they have "no name" and no frills, as another poster said, they're somehow more "real" than the products from those corporations who have higher prices because they use actual advertising. No name is only accepting your money reluctantly, because it has to fight the powers that be. 
Megan Dineen - April 7, 2009
view all comments
  brandchannel profile archive   2011  |  2010  | 2009  |  2008  |  2007  |  2006  |  2005  |  2004  |  2003  |  2002  |  2001
Dec 23, 2009 Prilosec - drug war -- Barry Silverstein
  Can Prilosec OTC cure the competition?
Dec 17, 2009 Family Dollar - bringing change -- Mark J. Miller
  Why Family Dollars is worth every penny.
Dec 10, 2009 Harrah's - a good bet -- Barry Silverstein
  Why the Harrah’s brand has got game.
Dec 2, 2009 Sutter Home Winery - uncorked -- Mark J. Miller
  Why Sutter Home has wine in its veins.
Nov 24, 2009 Kraft Peanut Butter (Canada) - sticky situation? -- Renée Alexander
  Kraft peanut butter has Canada on a cracker.
Nov 23, 2009 For Dummies - smart! -- Barry Silverstein
  The genius behind the For Dummies brand.
Nov 11, 2009 Dr Pepper - sick? -- Barry Silverstein
  Dr Pepper has the cure.
Nov 4, 2009 Dawn - cleaning up -- Barry Silverstein
  Dawn shines on expanding territory.
Oct 28, 2009 Alexander Keith's - pouring it on -- Reneé Alexander
  Alexander Keith’s savors its rebrand.
Oct 21, 2009 Tecnisa Construction Company - door-to-door -- Beth Furtado
  Tecnisa is building bonds and its brand in Brazil.
Oct 14, 2009 Rough Luxe - roughed up? -- Barry Silverstein
  Why there is No Vacancy at Rough Luxe?
Oct 2, 2009 Mondetta - flying high? -- Renée Alexander
  Mondetta’s flags fly once again.
Sep 30, 2009 Chico's - sized right? -- Barry Silverstein
  Chico’s tries on original styles and sizes.
Sep 23, 2009 TaylorMade - swinging? -- Mark J. Miller
  Why TaylorMade is part of an elite club.
Sep 14, 2009 Volute Wine - canned wine? -- Barry Silverstein
  Volute is bottling up the future of wine.
Sep 7, 2009 Chanel No. 5 - perfect perfume? -- Ana Paula Palombo Terzi
  Chanel’s future smells like its past.
Aug 31, 2009 Food From the ’Hood - growing potential -- Barry Silverstein
  Food From the ’Hood is prime branding real estate.
Aug 24, 2009 Viking Range Corporation - home on the range -- Mark Miller
  Viking Range seeks to pillage outdated kitchens.
Aug 17, 2009 Better Homes and Gardens - home sweet home? -- Barry Silverstein
  Better Homes and Gardens in the hood.
Aug 10, 2009 The Grid - line by line -- Mandy de Waal
  Find yourself on the Grid.
Aug 3, 2009 Nickelodeon - child's play? -- Barry Silverstein
  Why Nickelodeon rules kids.
Jul 27, 2009 Staples - buttons up -- Renée Alexander
  Staples’ brand, that was easy.
Jul 20, 2009 Pirate's Booty - snack fight! -- Barry Silverstein
  Pirate’s Booty is a branding treasure.
Jul 13, 2009 Hamam - steaming along? -- Elif Altunoklu
  Hamam gives the world a Turkish bath.
Jul 6, 2009 BIC - the write approach -- Barry Silverstein
  Why this brand is uBICuitous.
Jun 29, 2009 United Africa Company of Nigeria - refreshing? -- Eric Okeke
  UACN: food for thought.
Jun 22, 2009 Kohler - sinking in -- Barry Silverstein
  Kohler taps into international designs.
Jun 15, 2009 Hallmark - calling card -- Barry Silverstein
  Hallmark is more than a house of cards.
Jun 8, 2009 Moog - noted -- Barry Silverstein
  The electronic keys behind Moog’s brand.
Jun 1, 2009 Pentax - clicks with customers -- Jennifer Gidman
  Pentax focuses on brand advocates.
May 25, 2009 Cacau Show - sweet deal -- Beth Furtado
  Brazil has a taste for Cacau Show.
May 18, 2009 Swarovski - cutting edge? -- Barry Silverstein
  Swarovski still shines in modern times.
May 11, 2009 Mengniu Milk - skim? -- Banu Kannu
  Mengniu: Got milk scandal?
May 4, 2009 Polaroid - touched up -- Barry Silverstein
  Will Polaroid’s brand be fully developed?
Apr 27, 2009 Hand-Me-Down - howies' heirlooms -- Mya Frazier
  Is Hand-Me-Down passing on a new tradition?
Apr 20, 2009 A Prairie Home Companion - good company? -- Abram Sauer
  PHC’s unique field of branding.
Apr 13, 2009 Sellaband - cha-ching-aling -- Barry Silverstein
  Sellaband’s musical model pays off.
Mar 30, 2009 Granado - keeping up appearances -- Ana Paula Palombo Terzi
  Why Granado has Brazil feeling well.
Mar 23, 2009 Goldschläger - flakey? -- Abram Sauer
  Why Goldschläger is young at heart.
Mar 16, 2009 Lufthansa Italia - winging it? -- Barry Silverstein
  Lufthansa Italia takes flight.
Mar 9, 2009 Natura - eco-beauty -- Jovilson Azevedo
  Natura flourishes in a branding environment.
Mar 2, 2009 Ten Thousand Villages - crafty -- Barry Silverstein
  Fair trade for all from villages to malls.
Feb 23, 2009 Orla Kiely - on target -- Vivian Manning-Schaffel
  Orla Kiely dresses the part for Target.
Feb 16, 2009 Star lager - gazes -- Eric Okeke
  Star lager sparkles with history.
Feb 9, 2009 Hush Puppies - bitchin’ -- Barry Silverstein
  Why Hush Puppies are littered with success.
Feb 2, 2009 we - climate change -- Barry Silverstein
  Why we is in it together.
Jan 26, 2009 Carol’s Daughter - blossoms -- A.K. Cabell
  Carol’s Daughter grows up.
Jan 19, 2009 Bio-Oil - skin deep -- Mandy de Waal
  The healing power of Bio-Oil.
Jan 12, 2009 Burt’s Bees - natural buzz -- Barry Silverstein
  When honey makes money.
Jan 5, 2009 Zena AG - cutting edge? -- Jennifer Gidman
  Zena peels away branding challenges.