|
|
| |
|
Cambridge University
absent
September 20, 2004
Cambridge can laugh in the face of Coca-Cola. The fizzy drink is only 117 years old—young by the Old World standards of the University of Cambridge. But is Cambridge as good as Coke is at branding?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Founded around 1209, the University of Cambridge is among the oldest institutions in continuous operation. (Others include Bologna c. 1088, Sorbonne c. 1150, Oxford c. 1167, Salamanca 1218, Charles 1348 and Louvain 1425.) Although it has a strong web presence at www.cam.ac.uk, it doesn’t appear to be paying much attention to its already established brand.
The first impression is that the website is rather bland, uninspiring and off the mark. The home page is plain white with a top-left logo and a narrow strip providing the necessary Cambridge sky blue accent. The page's menus are organized in two categories: "information about" and "information for," which is confusing in spite of its logic. After many years of Internet surfing, users have been conditioned to look for "products" on the left, and "departments" on the top. More creative alternatives can add to a site if the usability remains high, which is not the case for cam.ac.uk.
|
|
|
| |
The composition of the page is well balanced, with four centrally-located pictures meant to enhance the brand identity. However, their choice is puzzling: a close-up on a student turning her back to the camera, a fuzzy, washed-out picture of another student, or a geometric perspective of a modern building might not reinforce Cambridge's brand.
Similarly puzzling, the Job Opportunities page rotates a series of photos as visitors return, but the dozen pages in the University & its Departments section all display the same picture depicting a couple of professors in deep red robes. Again, Cambridge selected to show its back rather than a more socially engaging side.
The lack of attention to detail also contributes to a poor image overall. Why is “its” in the title University and its Departments lower case? Why is “Fundraising” in the heading Alumni & Fundraising or “Undergraduates” in New Undergraduates capitalized while “applicants” in Graduate applicants not? We’re not just being picky here; one expects better and more consistent style usage from a university website.
The problem is that the site's branding is simply ill managed. But what’s worse is that the site could fit almost any university of almost any small town. With its history, faculty and college tradition, Cambridge is not any university. It belongs to a distinctive league, and should aspire to higher standards than this website connotes.
For the University of Cambridge, it is commendable to accumulate awards and Nobel Prizes, which can be found in reference to on this website. But in an era of short attention span, few will overcome bad form to reach the substance. This web presence is no beacon.
|
|
|
|
*Due to the constantly changing environment of websites, some reviews may no longer reflect the current website for this brand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Oct 18, 2004
|
Jell-O - A treat
|
|
|
Jell-O mixes up a treat that’s fun for the whole family.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Sep 27, 2004
|
Nike - does it
|
|
|
Nike offers an online workout for the armchair surfer
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Mar 22, 2004
|
Luciano Pavarotti - Bravo
|
|
|
Pavarotti bids farewell to the opera scene but leaves behind an ovation-worthy website.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Feb 16, 2004
|
FCUK - Cheeky
|
|
|
Taking shock online, FCUK fashions its site to appeal to teens.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Jan 12, 2004
|
Orange - Ripe
|
|
|
Does Orange.co.uk reflect the brand's fresh squeezed identity?
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2013 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|
|