|
|
| |
|
Shell Oil
shell game
by Abram Sauer
May 26, 2008
As gas costs increase, some studies are showing that consumers are very much brand sensitive. Market researchers at NPD Group recently told Ad Age (Apr. 21) that consumers were citing a brand of fuel’s performance as a reason for buying it over price, marking “a turnaround after a decade of decline, indicating big oil’s branding pushes are beginning to pay off.” Shell Oil’s branding efforts have increased. But is the company’s website playing the key role that it should?
|
|
|
|
|
|
The “Shell” brand that gasoline consumers know has very little to do with all of the complex inner workings of what can be expected from a bazillion-dollar company headquartered in a small European nation that itself has no oil. Indeed, consumers probably think about “filling station” Shell more than the “oil company” Shell.
Like most websites for large conglomerates with extensive product lines in many markets covering the B2B and B2C spectrum, Shell.com is forced to address everything on one page. Additionally, given the brand’s business interests, there isn’t a whole lot of sexy expected; it’s not that kind of oil. Visitors are expected to manage their expectations. And all things considered, Shell.com does a swell job.
While the four main buckets are far from exciting, they do address the areas that might interest a hypothetical Shell.com visitor. In a rare display of candidness, Shell.com’s search cloud tells a visitor all he or she needs to know about what the most important website sections are. Also, it tells us how good a job the homepage does in addressing them. Are the biggest cloud terms addressed on the homepage? Yes, so it’s a good homepage. Case closed.
Multiplatform business interests aside, it is at Shell-branded filling stations—of which it controls over 40,000 globally, 25,000 of which are in the US alone—that Shell is looking to set its brand of commodity apart from its competitors'. In the Midwest state in which this author lives, a gallon of gasoline is now almost exactly the same price as a pack of cigarettes. But unlike cigarettes, gasoline does not come in menthol nor does it come with differing leaf qualities, flavors, cuts or aspirational qualities: Gasoline is a commodity with little difference between brands… right? So Shell’s challenge is that many consumers see gasoline as all the same. Plus, Shell cannot use price sensitivity in any way to “brand” its product because of gasoline being considered a commodity, which, in turn, reinforces the idea that there is no difference in brands of gasoline.
|
|
|
| |
Some part of the Shell branding strategy incorporates value-added benefits such as reward cards and station-based facilities. But when it comes to the gas itself, the challenge is clear and requires two steps: 1) Convince consumers there are differences in the brands of gasoline they buy; and 2) convince those consumers that Shell gasoline is superior. Without answering the first “why,” consumers will see no reason than to remain largely price sensitive.
Google “shell gas” and Localshell.com is the number two result. Localshell.com front-and-center addresses what most motorists think about when they think about gas: relevant facts about fuel, fuel saving tips, and their own fuel IQ. The site is simple, clean and unencumbered by things like… relevant updates. Of the three highlighted updates on the page, the most recent (“Shell Study Reveals Americas Autopias”) dates from when gasoline averaged around US$ 2.20 a gallon (Apr. 2005). In the “New and Exciting” section, a feature touts Shell’s fuel quality for “This Summer,” which is apparently 2006.
And we’ll assume that the floating, unknown entry fields at the top are for finding one’s local Shell station. Ironic that such function made to help you find something would itself be so un-findable.
The Localshell.com site does link off to updated sections on FuelStretch about getting better gas mileage and the weather (weather.com). But in terms of branding, the site doesn’t do much at all. This is a shame because the “Shell for Motorists” sub-site (found off the “Shell in the US” site) does a fine job of branding Shell gasoline, front-and-center asking “Are All Gasolines the Same?” and offering info on “Top Tier Fuels.” Not to mention a Shell station finder that can be found.
But the “Shell for Motorists” sub-site is too difficult to find. It does not show up on a Google search for “shell gas.” A small consolation is that the US site, the first result for a “shell gasoline” search, does have a detectable link to “Shell for Motorists” in its left navigation bar.
When it comes to getting the word out about Shell’s brand of gasoline, conventional routes such as television, print and point-of-sale messaging are clearly the most effective for establishing brand identity. Shell’s web presence and online efforts will primarily reach only those consumers who make an effort to seek out particular information about the brand and its products. But if Shell is serious about its brand identity, then there is no excuse for not updating $2-a-gallon gasoline on Localshell.com.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abram D. Sauer has written about brands and branding trends since 2001. Visit www.abesauer.com for more of his work on branding and product placement.
|
|
|
*Due to the constantly changing environment of websites, some reviews may no longer reflect the current website for this brand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2013 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|
|