linked in facebook twitter rss

  • Interbrand
  • Brandchannel

your chance!
your chance!
view comments



Do the big fashion houses need a celebrity designer in the lead? Borat Vs. Kazakhstan Do the big fashion houses need a celebrity designer in the lead?
 commenting closed Add Social Bookmark bookmark print
 suggest topic  recommend ( 9 )  email

Do the big fashion houses need a celebrity designer in the lead?
 
 The problem with a 'star' designer is that he (she) generally changes the look to make an impression on the house.

The label loses its signature style and as a result loses a strong part of its brand. 

Kate Redbrick - April 3, 2005
 
 Without a big personality there is no label.

In addition to being the face of the brand, a strong long-term personality at the helm helps the large fashion houses ride out the trends and whims of the season with consistency and stability. 

Zizza Fiorello - April 4, 2005
 
 For many of the target audience, the 'star' designer is the brand. 
Maurice Barnwell, Co-proprietor, Flying Frog Design - April 4, 2005
 
 The company/house should be aware that building up a brand that relies on one star designer is too risky. The star designer should be a marketing tool for the brand to increase sales, but not the only reason. Otherwise, why not brand after the designer's name? 
Lilibelle Lin, Associate Brand Manager - April 4, 2005
 
 The problem is that a star designer more often than not becomes 'hotter' than the brand he/she is supposed to design for (think Gucci & Ford). This is where you run into trouble. Nothing nor anyone should be bigger than the brand itself. That's a recipe for long term disaster (normally for the fashion world it's sooner than later).

In my opinion, Chanel is one of the few brands worldwide that manages this well. Afterall you do have the designer's ego to handle! Largerfeld is hot, but Chanel is hotter. 

Guilherme Rodrigues, Partner, Neural Click Consultants - April 4, 2005
 
view all comments
  2013  |  2011  |  2010  |  2009  |  2008  |  2007  |  2006  | 2005  |  2004  |  2003  |  2002  |  2001
 
 
Dec 5, 2005 Where are Indian brands on the global stage?
  How is it that India has not yet produced a global brand to rank among the top 100 of the world?
   
 
Oct 31, 2005 Phishing and spam: Is it damaging to the brand?
  Brand spam: A minor annoyance or a growing threat to the consumer’s relation to the brand?
   
 
Oct 3, 2005 Is there such a thing as bad publicity for a brand?
  Is it possible that scandal is the best thing that can happen to your brand’s spokesperson?
   
 
Sep 5, 2005 What can drug companies do to improve their image?
  Can the sickness in the pharmaceutical industry’s image be remedied among patients?
   
 
Aug 1, 2005 Is eBay unstoppable?
  Is 2005's fastest growing brand eBay beyond stopping?
   
 
Jul 4, 2005 Does Corporate Sponsorship Score Goals with Consumers?
  Do corporate names on stadia and sports events see a justifiable return on investment? Does anyone remember the name, and if so, are they really more inclined to purchase the product?
   
 
May 30, 2005 Who Owns Manchester United? The fans, the players or Malcolm Glazer?
  Tempest in a teacup? What does Manchester United’s sale mean for the brand?
   
 
May 2, 2005 Brand beginnings
  When should branding get involved in new pharmaceutical development? Is there any value to starting early?
   
 
Mar 7, 2005 What is the future for HP?
  Should HP stay the course or spin off into two units?
   
 
Jan 31, 2005 What Will Save Sony?
  What is the best way forward for Sony?
   
 
Jan 3, 2005 Is Brand Loyalty Dead?
  Is price-cutting killing brand loyalty?