linked in facebook twitter rss

  • Interbrand
  • Brandchannel

your chance!
your chance!
view comments



Client Vs. Agency Borat Vs. Kazakhstan Client Vs. Agency
   
 

“There is no point in engaging people for their talent and then restricting their contribution.” So says Ismail Merchant in the Financial Times (July 21, 2001). Here he’s speaking about filmmaking but he could as easily be voicing the frustrations of any consultant who has stood by bereft as his project is picked apart and ultimately destroyed by a client who thinks he knows better.

Why do clients engage in the ironical behavior of hiring someone to do a job only to arrive at the conclusion that they themselves will do it better?

And while we are on the subject, how come the client can do it better? Why are they stuck with generic products that look suspiciously like they rolled off the template assembly line when they are hiring people who are meant to be more talented than they?

 
 

Let’s just review some of the stages of the tenuous relation between client and consultant. The beginning is generally rosy enough. Typically the client reviews a handful of current agencies and/or new players before embarking on a project. Ideally, the client provides specs, the agency/consultancy responds to the pitch requirements, an agency is chosen and the project begins.

But let’s just back up a minute here. The agency spends (usually) out-of-pocket money in researching the project, preparing the pitch and (sometimes) travelling to meet with the client. The client sits through countless grueling pitches where the moon is promised and every wish will purportedly be catered to. Similar to a marriage, the client is left to ruefully recount these vows later when the deliverables turn out to be less than adequate.Where does it go wrong? We spoke to clients and discovered that the complaints range from agencies misleading clients’ expectations to agencies’ lack of understanding of local limitations in implementation. Agencies, on the other hand, had a lot of “off the record” things to say about the lack of time, budget and creative freedom... although they weren’t quite so succinct or plainspoken.

One thing is certain: this is obviously a hot button issue – one that all of us face on a day-to-day basis. So we welcome you to tell each other what’s eating you. Perhaps a little airing of differences will lead us all to serve one another a little better. Or if nothing else, at least you’ll have gotten it off your chest.

 
 commenting closed Add Social Bookmark bookmark print
 suggest topic  recommend ( 7 )  email

Client Expectation Versus Agency Performance
 
 A crucial element in any client-agency relationship is the level of understanding of each other's expectations. Most agencies start off very well with their clients, after winning the job but the energy and enthusiasm fizzles out after a while. The same applies to the client. When either party experiences something better with another client or another agency, the feeling that they are not getting the best creeps in and they feel dissatisfied with each other. Getting the best out of each other requires both parties to comprehend each other's expectations and be ready to give and take. 
CY - July 27, 2001
 
 We have been witnessing Agency-Client relationship for the over a century, if there is an attrition i'd say "Be Clear on both sides ie Agency - c wat the client wants and Client - c wat the agency wants to do"

Ultimately a mutual understanding and also a margin of difference to be maintained. 

Rishab, Exec Business development, pentagon global solutions - July 27, 2001
 
 Open avenues of clear communication is needed. A client needs to review all the information concerning the agency's work and past client relationship. This may take time and yes, even money. But in the long run, a well informed client is now better suited to see what the strengths and weeknesses are of a potential client. Conversely, an agency needs to do it's homework too. There is nothing worse than a group of people from agency meeting with a client, sitting through countless hours of discussions, pitching, and basic give-and-take if they are completely [fully] unaware of what their client does.

Clients and agencies are very similar in that they have a lot of ideas they want to put forth, but the reality is if neither side is actually listening to what the other has to say, you are ultimately destined to fail.

Thus, communication, education and understanding is what is needed. This is very basic, but in my experiences it is always the most basic issues that get overlooked in an agency's rush to fullfill billable hours. 

efren, ceo & president, bostonstudios.com - July 27, 2001
 
 Trust is key. Agency needs to build trust and manage the relationship. The problem most often stems from client relegating critical decisions into the hands of junior product managers. Brand custodian is a board room agenda. Afterall is this not what we call Brand Value, an interest that the Board should champion? 
phyllis, managing partner, Communication Consultancy - July 27, 2001
 
 I think it's all about accountability. Clients are by their jobs, marketers and therfore have that expansive mentality. In their view, A&P should happen. And because they have to happen at a cost, clients will always watch closely value accountability. 
Edwin, Product Manager, Client - July 30, 2001
 
view all comments
  2013  |  2011  |  2010  |  2009  |  2008  |  2007  |  2006  |  2005  |  2004  |  2003  |  2002  | 2001  | 
 
 
Dec 31, 2001 How far can the EU brand stretch before it loses its exclusive properties?
  Can varied nations merge without losing the overall brand of the union?
   
 
Dec 3, 2001 When Good Brands Go Bad: Predicting the future of troubled brands.
  Which brands are losing ground and bound for bankruptcy in the near future? What are they doing wrong and what should they do for a turnaround?
   
 
Nov 5, 2001 Does the early bird always get the worm?
  Money and distribution means upstarts can immediately compete with old-line brands, making the first mover advantage obsolete. Or is it?
   
 
Oct 1, 2001 Are you pro logo or no logo?
  Do brands manipulate consumers? Or is it the other way around?
   
 
Sep 3, 2001 Does “God” need a rebrand?
  Does "God" deliver on the brand promise?
   
 
Jul 2, 2001 Time for a brand new strategy?
  Should you cut back on your brand investment and wait out the recession? Or strike while the field is sparse?
   
 
Jun 4, 2001 What role should branding play in politics?
  Has political branding gone too far or only just begun? Do we elect our leaders on their policy or their social skills?
   
 
May 7, 2001 Ad Agencies vs. Consultancies: Weighing the difference
  Are ad agencies a thing of the past?
   
 
Apr 9, 2001 Local vs. Global Brands: Who will win?
  Can mom & pop survive despite the omnipresence of such megabrands as Starbucks, Burger King and Hennes & Mauritz?
   
 
Mar 5, 2001 Are brand owners cleaning up their act or just their appearance?
  What sort of responsibility do brands hold to be good corporate citizens?
   
 
Feb 5, 2001 Can Firestone get back on the road?
  Will the Firestone brand roll on or blow out?