Posted by Dale Buss on April 23, 2013 11:51 AM
While the Obama administration continues to deliberate to what extent and how quickly food and beverage companies must communicate more nutrition information on the packages of their products, more CPG leaders are stepping out with their own initiatives to address still-rising concerns about junk food and obesity in America.
Hershey is the latest. The candy leader announced that it will print the amounts of calories, saturated fats, sodium and sugar per serving on the front of all of its packages beginning in the second half of this year and evolving across all of its packaging over the next several years.
"We are doing this because we belive that front-of-pack labeling provides consumers with straightforward information that empowers them to make informed food and beverage choices when shopping," said a Hershey spokesman, according to Candy and Snack Today.Continue reading...
Posted by Dale Buss on September 26, 2011 11:54 AM
The growing fight between the federal government and the food and beverage industry over front-of-package nutritional labeling is going to come down to these words: "Some product icons may also provide information about fiber, vitamins, calcium and other nutrients that are essential for a healthy diet."
This sentence is taken from the new web site that describes the labeling system being pursued by the industry and being promoted now in the early stages of a $50 million consumer awareness campaign. Companies understandably want to be able to tout the positive nutritional attributes of their branded products in addition to listing, in an easy-to-understand, standard format, what might be called the "baddies": sugar, saturated fats, calories and sodium.
Mainstream food and beverage manufacturers have spent billions of dollars reformulating old products and introducing new ones along better-for-you lines over the last several years, so why shouldn't they want to promote these advantages to consumers right there on the front of the package?Continue reading...
chew on this
Posted by Dale Buss on January 26, 2011 05:45 PM
American food and beverage manufacturers and retailers finally launched their new system for front-of-package nutritional labeling this week, declaring with political point-scoring in mind that it all had to do with prompting by First Lady Michelle Obama and her anti-obesity initiative.
But the reality is more complicated:
• The industry doesn’t like the system favored by Mrs. Obama and the Food & Drug Administration, which is still devising its own new “voluntary” standards for nutritional labeling – and so the group launched a scheme that the feds won’t completely endorse.
• While crediting Mrs. Obama’s efforts from the bully pulpit, some manufacturers already were using essentially the same system they have now settled upon — even before the First Lady embraced the childhood-obesity platform and urged them to change their labels.Continue reading...
Posted by Barry Silverstein on January 26, 2011 05:00 PM
When the First Lady of the United States commits to an issue, she commits. And no issue has been closer to Michelle Obama's heart than childhood obesity.
Her desire to use her clout to spur nutrition prompted the First Lady to give a speech last March, in which she urged food manufacturers to create labels for their products that would help consumers do a better job of choosing the right foods.
In May, she announced Let's Move, a national anti-obesity campaign targeting children. In September, she urged the restaurant industry to step up. And last week, Mrs. Obama joined Wal-Mart corporate execs to launch the brand's healthy eating initiative.
Now the Grocery Manufacturers Association and the Food Marketing Institute have worked together to answer Mrs. Obama's call, but the new labels they're introducing, dubbed Nutrition Keys, leave a lot to be desired, meeting with only "tepid" approval from the First Lady — and thus the White House and the Federal government.Continue reading...