Interbrand IQ: The Best Asian Brands Issue

rss

when brands collide

Pow! Bam! Whoa!: The Logic Behind Disney's Marvel Takeover

Posted by Nic Musolino on September 2, 2009 03:19 PM

As you read earlier this week (unless you were locked up in Arkham Asylum), Disney is buying Marvel. A triumph for the current leadership at Marvel, considering past regimes have pushed the company right up to the edge (and over) of insolvency a couple times, even as arch-nemesis DC Comics trundled along, safe under the Time Warner umbrella.

The benefits to Disney are obvious: they have always understood the value of franchise characters and need to buy some revenue pronto. And Marvel, finally seeing an exit that wouldn’t result in shareholders comically running in place before they plunged into the freezing waters of Chapter 11 Ravine, must be more than pleased.

The takeaway for brand managers is that even if the corporate structure is wrong-headed, defending your property always has long term value. Comic editors are notoriously fussy, geeky, and generally obsessive of the proper maintenance of continuity — a constitution that reflects their loyal, vocal fan base. The consequent stability tends to produce brands that can be almost infinitely extended and monetized.

That equation wasn't lost on Time Warner, which was happy to sustain low returns from DC while putting out high quality product — a more than justifiable loss leader, as Batman and Superman threw off literally billions in licensing revenue.

The verve with which Disney protects Mickey Mouse and his cohort bode well for fans of Ghost Rider and Dr. Strange. You're unlikely to see awkward crossovers anytime soon — even if the premise of a buddy film featuring Howard the Duck and Daffy Duck is pretty funny.

Comments

Rick United States says:

"And Marvel, finally seeing an exit that wouldn’t result in shareholders comically running in place before they plunged into the freezing waters of Chapter 11 Ravine..."

Where do you get that Marvel shareholders were anywhere near a bankruptcy? The company has been humming along for years since the late 90's turnaround, with subsequent returns in the neighborhood of 1400%.

I agree that this deal makes sense, but there's a strong argument that Marvel sold too soon, and had years of strong growth left in them.

September 17, 2009 09:42 AM #

fast payday loans United States says:

Yea nice Work !Laughing

November 26, 2009 05:19 PM #

payday loans United States says:

I just hope to have understood this the way it was meant

November 26, 2009 05:50 PM #

faxless payday loans United States says:

Hmmm interesting stuff

November 30, 2009 03:48 PM #

cash loans United States says:

Do you have any more info on this?

December 27, 2009 02:59 AM #

replica handbags United States says:

This is a very wonderful views, hope everyone positive promotion!!!!!

January 21, 2010 10:15 PM #

chanel handbags on sale People's Republic of China says:

<a href="www.coachofnewyork.com/...gs-p-3295.html">  chanel handbags on sale</a>

March 15, 2010 09:34 PM #

replica bags People's Republic of China says:

3333This is a very wonderful views, hope everyone positive promotion!!!!!

April 12, 2010 10:51 PM #

Comments are closed

Brand Chatter on Twitter

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameo2013 Product Placement Awards
Which brand is most bullish on Hollywood?
Coca-ColaIt's the Journey That Matters:
Coca-Cola Opens Up With Story-Based Web Refresh
debateJoin the Debate
What makes a great brand?
BPBP
Branding Comeback Challenges
Denise Lee YohnLance Armstrong’s Brand
Denise Lee Yohn Weighs In
Digital Watch: WahlAT&T
Rethinking Possible With Transmedia Storytelling
paperGlobal Competitive [Ad]vantage
The latest from GeoEdge
Sheryl Connelly
Sheryl Connelly

Meet Ford's Resident Futurist
Marketing to the New MajorityBranding 123
A primer by Barry Silverstein