Meta-Luxury

rss

brand of crazy

Fox's Glenn Beck Stokes Resentment, Builds Engagement, But Loses Sponsors

Posted by Stephanie Startz on September 17, 2009 08:48 AM

As angry scores (or, allegedly, millions!) protested against Obama in Washington D.C. and in state capitols this weekend, a pied piper was goading them along: blowhard Fox News Channel host Glenn Beck. The gregarious, incendiary radio and television personality, author, and entrepreneur has been stoking the inchoate fires of Red State resistance on US radio airwaves since 2002, and on Fox since January, just in time for Obama's swearing-in.

At Fox, Beck has found an audience eager for his combative challenge to the new administration. His ratings skyrocketed, along with his book sales and overall recognition. Despite (i.e., because of) all the controversy, ridicule and advertiser fallout, Beck is at the height of his career and his brand value is swelling. But his ability to tap into the culture of resentment has not been a pure business success for Fox -- though it certainly fits the rough, outspoken conservative brand of many Rupert Murdoch media properties.

In August, Beck came under fire for calling the President "racist." Advertisers quickly began to pull out of the program (though not the network), and the Left had discovered its newest punching bag. At the same time Beck's ratings soared past the competition.

In a Forbes interview, Beck claimed that his personal brand is based upon authenticity, but not that stuffy, boring authenticity you already find on cable news in such abundance. Beck offers his audience "the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment." Beck builds his brand using a toolkit that includes unrestrained emotion, wild accusations and failed art history lessons. It's obvious he isn't guided by consumer insight research. Beck goes on instinct. Every fiasco and meltdown is proof of the lack of sophistication and planning in his business model.

Beck rides polarization, which can be helpful to some brands. His runaway success thrives on negative backlash. He mixes in a dose of goofy affability, with a range of vocal impressions that are often offensive but sometimes just silly, like Kermit the Frog. Like a pundit version of George W. Bush, you want to have a beer with Beck -- and mouth off about welfare cheats.

"I don't think you can make an impact in this world without being ubiquitous," Beck explains. It's advice he follows carefully, broadcasting his brand across multiple platforms. Beck has a compelling product to sell, even if it really boils down to a cartoon of his Obama-hating audience.

Comments

Elaine United States says:

The march on Washington was not a "protest against our President". It really was a protest against politicians making decisions for this country that they feel don't represent the best interests of the country. Forget about Beck - he is just one voice that some agree with and others dislike immensely.  But you have to give the man credit for asking people to wake up and pay attention to what is going on in our country. For too long we have just lived in our own little worlds and basically ignore life outside our neigborhoods. Frankly, I'm pleased to see people are finally paying attention, asking questions, and challenging the elected officials (and the czars) in the beltway.

Agree or disagree with Beck all you would like, but the fact still remains that he has challenged people to be less self-centered, learn about the issues, and get involved again.

September 17, 2009 11:16 AM #

andy halmay Costa Rica says:

Right on.  Amen!

September 18, 2009 06:06 AM #

Kent Covington United States says:

Absolutely right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ms. Startz has certainly let us know where she stands politically. This was not a "brand" piece. It was an opportunity for her to insult Glenn Beck. I won't be reading anything here in the future.

September 18, 2009 10:03 AM #

chazcast United States says:

Wow, I thought I was going to read about branding, but instead I got, a rant about Glenn Beck,

I wonder if the writer or Brand Channel, was there to stick up for Bush when every news outlet, blog and hollywood actor was calling him everything in the book. I did not know Brand Channel was a news organization or a blog.

So when was it not the RIGHT of the US citizen to voice their opinion? I also wonder how long Brand Channel has been around and what their audience size and rating are compared to Beck's.

So if you want to talk about branding, then Beck has his Brand, that is America, what is he #3 in the cable news market since January? Not bad brand building! I hope my brands takes off like that, I'll bet you do too.

I don't like Coke-a-Cola, but that dose not mean that it is not first in the mind of consumers.

Branding is about owning a word in the mind of the consumer, I watch Beck sometimes, do you? If I were to say what the Glenn Beck Brand is, what the GB Brand owns in the mind of the consumer, I would have to say it is "Question With Boldness".

How many today would have been traders with the Patriots of the 13 colonies?

Talk about Brand Building, the founders, had to build a Brand of Independence and Justice for all in a time when freedoms were mandated by the King and the Sate!

I think America is a really great Brand! I think it is the best Brand in the world. Can anyone name another country where people from all over the world have been doing whatever they have to come to for over 200 years?

America is about the opportunity for every individual to be an American Brand!
    

September 17, 2009 01:15 PM #

Mickey Australia says:

Can anyone name another country where people from all over the world have been doing whatever they have to come to for over 200years?
Well Im guessing you mean 'doing whatever they have come to do, as in fulfill their dreams etc etc?
Yeah well the answer is Australia!
One of the most racially diverse nations on earth!
But back to the issue at hand - whether you are watching a Michael Moore film or this guy on FOX - the main point here is that so long as they get people to engage in the national and global debate and ask questions then they are doing their job.
But for the purposes of the here & now - yes - we have strayed from the branding path....
Politics aside - I saw this as a more than reasonable branding topic - it makes no political judgements whatsoever.
No more than the jennifer Anniston story at least!

September 20, 2009 07:20 PM #

E. Scott Denison United States says:

If this is supposed to be a forum for branding, then why are we getting snide, political bias threaded through an article masquerading as an objective assessment of a brand? This article is fraught with eye rolling, condescending, and disparaging remarks which have nothing to do with the topic. It's all unnecessary and falls short of the professionalism that I have come to expect from the Brand Channel. I hope this is the end of it.

September 18, 2009 08:42 AM #

Maria Ramstetter United States says:

I agree with my fellow brand seekers that this article falls short of what I expected from the usual and interesting articles and opinions on branding. Debate issues with substance. We are living in scary times America. Question with Boldness!

I prefer to be true to myself, even at the hazard of incurring the ridicule of others, rather than to be false, and to incur my own abhorrence.
Frederick Douglass

Brandchannel just damaged their brand with this article.

September 18, 2009 09:11 AM #

candis United States says:

I agree as well that this is the last place I would expect to see an article as this.

People are waking up and once again using their God given right to say what they feel. That is a good thing. This country has changed drastically for the worst and only the people can get it back if they unite.

This article and the Jennifer Aniston article should be found on Entertainment Tonight or Extra not here. You have damaged your own brand.

September 18, 2009 09:26 AM #

pat United States says:

I really enjoy Brand Channel for - usually - brilliant insights into branding. How disappointing to find it used as yet another inappropriate outlet for a vitriolic political diatribe. Maybe the writer should consider sending it in to the Op Ed section of the New York Times. Like him or dispise him, the Glenn Beck 'brand' could have been a highly interesting case study. Any chance for a mulligan?

September 18, 2009 09:27 AM #

David N. United States says:

Wow, what a biased liberal rant (loaded with name calling and false data) for an article supposed to be about branding.  I expected more from Brand Channel.

This "writer" has used this venue to prick his finger in the eye of honest, law-abiding Americans who want nothing more than for a truthful voice to be heard and for our elected officials to hear the voice of the people.

False statement 1:  We can assume this 'writer' wasn't at the rally.  We were not angry, this was a peaceful rally with a lot of America loving people who are concerned about the direction this country is heading.  If you weren't there, you can't imagine what it feels like to be amidst so many cheerful, well-meaning people in a crowd this large.

False statement 2:  Perpetuating this lie that there were only 'scores' of people or even 'tens of thousands' is just proof of this 'writers' liberal bias.  This rally filled the Capital, the Mall, and spilled out into numerous side areas throughout the area.  From the pictures, it can clearly be seen that this was nearly as large a crowd as Obama's Inauguration.  The Liberals scream from the roof tops that this was a crowd of 'many millions'.  Yet nearly the same size conservative crowd is only 'scores' or 'tens of thousands' to them.  I was there.  I couldn't tell you how many, but it was certainly hundreds of thousands and I would not be surprised if it was actually over a million or so.

False statement 3:  We were NOT there to protest Obama. We were at the rally to show our elected officials that there truly is a large voice in America that is concerned about the direction we're headed.  Our concern is the rampant spending and the grab for power by all of Congress.  We don't like the Presiden't policies, neither do we like what Congress is doing.  We just want our voice heard since the Liberal media refuses to do it for us.  This was not about Obama.

WHAT?  "Stoking the inchoate fires of Red State resistance"?   Mainstream America is "the resistance" now?  Is his next article going to be about how resistance is futile?  This is an article about branding?

Brand Channel, do you even review these before posting them as an article about "Branding"?  I expected more.  I agree with Maria, you have damaged your brand by allowing this type of biased rant to pose as an article about branding.

Thank you for the 'other' information you provide on your site about branding.  David

September 18, 2009 09:46 AM #

Kent Covington United States says:

Unfair, insulting, ignorant piece. I'm truly disgusted to find something like this disguised as a branding piece. Unreal.

September 18, 2009 10:29 AM #

Brian Illig United States says:

Great, Brand Channel has a political agenda. It's become yet another annoying political soap box and I'm shocked that you would so lose sight of your own brand image. I WAS looking forward to more focused, professional viewpoints and marketing facts in the future from Brand Channel, but now...

What are you thinking?

September 18, 2009 10:32 AM #

Wes Burgiss United States says:

Whether you agree or disagree with GB, from a brand POV, his brand is strong and one to envy. This article was mostly pulled from the Time (Time Warner/CNN) smear piece on GB coming out this weekend and already posted on the internet. If you are going to have an opinion politically, at least have the courage to let it be your own. Beck certainly does. GB started months ago on cable and the last ratings of several days ago had his show at #2 right behind O'Reilly. If the author of this piece understood brand building at all, and clearly they do not by this piece, then they would understand the meteoric nature of the GB brand. This person doesn't understand brand, current trends or politics. Who's at the wheel at Brand Central? Maybe they should do a piece on: "Brand Central, how to diminish your brand with one easy blog."

September 18, 2009 11:47 AM #

Siobhan United States says:

I agree that this article wasn't particularly insightful, but it does help illuminate the brand power and reach of Beck. Look how quickly the angry and defensive comments roled in accusing the author and Brand Channel of political bias. Beck's approach in deliberatly anti-intellectual, emotional and visceral. His brand is about inciting gut reactions from people - something he does very well on both sides of the political spectrum. His brand has real power. The same power you find in a schoolyard bully. Brand Channel better think twice before it prints anything bad about Glenn Beck. Or else!

P.S. It would have been nice to see this topic tackled with more academic vigor.  

September 18, 2009 12:02 PM #

Tim Blake United States says:

It's amazing to me how liberals can dish it out, but can't seem to take it. Since when is telling the truth incendiary?
I am continuously amazed at how willing the media and other liberals, including brandchannel is willing to suck up to this guy simply because he's a minority. Didn't Bush have two secretaries of state, several supreme court nominees and multiple other cabinet appointees who were minorities? But because these minorities were conservatives, they were branded as "traitors" or "Uncle Tom".
Personally, I've never even watched Glen Beck, but the video clip at the top of this article is not incendiary, unless of course you desire a centrally controlled government, dictating what and whom you can write about.

September 18, 2009 01:10 PM #

Paul Wilson United States says:

Sadly, your transparent bias has clouded whatever point you might have made about Glenn Beck as a brand.  You have committed the unpardonable sin in branding...you have wasted my time by promoting your own agenda and offering me nothing of value.  Imagine if a major advertiser did the same; what would your review of their advertising sound like?  It would sound like the comments you have received...100% negative.  

September 22, 2009 09:43 AM #

Douglas Fender United States says:

Glenn fights corruption in Government and we should all help him fight more.

October 4, 2009 10:59 AM #

payday loans United States says:

Interesting post

November 11, 2009 09:58 AM #

payday loans United States says:

thanks!  very helpful post!! like the template btw ;)

November 30, 2009 03:54 PM #

louis vuitton People's Republic of China says:

2222  , your transparent bias has clouded whatever point you might have made about Glenn Beck as a brand.  You have committed the unpardonable sin in branding...you have wasted my time by promoting your own agenda and offering me nothing of value.  Imagine if a major advertiser did the same; what would your review of their advertising sound like?  It would sound like the comments you have received...100% negative.  

April 12, 2010 11:55 PM #

Comments are closed

What Branders are Saying on Twitter

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameoThe Avengers
Acura leads brand blitz
Martin LindstromMartin Lindstrom:
On Brandwashing, Brand Ethics, and Privacy
debateJoin the Debate
What's your can't live without brand?
BPBP
Back in Business?
Michael Stone and Nancy BaileyMove Over Mad Men: Here Come the Brand Licensors
Beanstalk's Michael Stone & Nancy Bailey
Digital Watch: WahlWahl Climbing
Wahl’s Digital Branding
paperThe Millennial Consumer: Debunking Stereotypes
The latest from The Boston Consulting Group
Jeff Weedman
P&G's Jeff Weedman

Connect + Develop Your Career
Marketing to the New MajorityBranding 123
By Barry Silverstein