truth in packaging

Do Sweatshop Scandals Really Damage Brands?

Posted by Laura Fitch on November 20, 2009 05:59 PM

A five-part Global Post investigation charges big-name brands like Apple and Microsoft with sourcing from exploitative factories in Asia guilty of human rights and work safety offenses. But do consumers even care?

Sweatshop scandals make for eye-catching headlines, but seem to have little impact on a company's image or bottom line. Consumers are able to compartmentalize their own priorities the far-off needs of strangers.

George T. Haley, director of the Center for International Industry Competitiveness, writes in MacNewsWorld:

There will always be a part of the market that will respond to notice of sweatshops being used... But outside of that small constituency, they are hardly ever affected in the long run.

In the 1990s, celebrities and students joined to boycott Nike over working conditions, but this had little impact on Nike's long-term brand positioning.

Often, abusive working conditions in Asian factories violate the policies of the companies they supply. When exposed, most brands blame suppliers and toughen those policies. But often, these rules are not enforced, making them largely marketing efforts to mitigate damages to the brand's reputation and public appeal.

"Worse, the codes permit the big brands to pat themselves on the back, even as workers continue to be exploited," note Jonathan Adams and Kathleen E. McLaughlin in the Global Post article. 

Which begs the question: if sweatshop allegations are not enough to damage brands or decrease sales, what incentives do brands have to change conditions on factory floors?


Howard J. Wilk United States says:

Raises the question, not begs the question.  Look it up.

November 23, 2009 10:06 AM #

Seattle Marriage Records says:

The both of us genuinely loved your weblog post. It appears like you have put a ton of effort into your web post and this world need more of these on the Internet these days. I don't have a bunch to to say in reply, I just wanted to sign up to say well done.

November 26, 2009 11:02 PM #

Deon Binneman South Africa says:

It raises an interesting question!

Why then did Nike change?

Why did they spend just on 10 years to jack up their sustainbale practices? Why has sustainable Supply chain management practices become the norm?

The problem is that an issue in one area has multiple impacts, and that is often ignored.


November 27, 2009 11:36 AM #

payday loans United States says:

Interesting post

December 23, 2009 11:12 AM #

Hottest News on Earth United States says:

This a little bit funny. I found your site via search engine a few moment ago, and luckily, this is the only information I was looking for the last hours.

January 27, 2010 09:26 AM #

nike-air-max-shoes People's Republic of China says:

er, the Light-Up Shoes became much less gradually. I don't expect that there is still Light-Up Shoe in the<a href="">nike air max ltd</a>
. If I wear the <a href="">nike air max 95</a>
, I will feel back to the childhood. If you want to buy <a href="">nike air max shoes</a>
, I will recommend you Nike shoes. Although the Nike shoes' price is a little expensive, but it is fashion, and the workmanship is very fine. Buy a suitable pair of <a href="">nike air max 90</a>
; you will never regret buying it. It will provide comfort to your feet and will also increase your beauty.

February 21, 2010 07:51 PM #

prefabrik United Kingdom says:

Good topic. I think this issue should be discussed deeply.

March 10, 2010 01:36 AM #

Zigong lantern festival United States says:

I am impressed by the quality of information on this website.  There are a lot of good resources here.  I am sure I will visit this place again soon.

March 15, 2010 01:46 AM # adalah Multiple Search Engine Popular United States says:

nice to be here, thanks for share... thanks

March 17, 2010 10:08 PM #

Sport Supplement United Kingdom says:

thats an interesting question as the title of the article.

March 28, 2010 02:18 PM #

replica handbags People's Republic of China says:

2222  thats an interesting question as the title of the article.

April 12, 2010 11:30 PM #

Comments are closed

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameo2014 Product Placement Awards
Apple loses its crown to a new #1
Coca-ColaIt's the Journey That Matters:
Coca-Cola Opens Up With Story-Based Web Refresh
debateJoin the Debate
Is product placement a waste of money?
Arthur Chinski and Joshua Mizrahi
Model Behavior? Brands Beware
U.S. Legal Changes Impact Use of Brand Ambassadors
paperCorporate Citizenship in Canada
Fresh thinking from Interbrand
Sheryl Connelly
Sheryl Connelly

Meet Ford's Resident Futurist
Highlighting the Present—and Future—of Branding in Latin America and Iberia