Meta-Luxury

rss

literary brands

Newspapers Must Better Leverage Their Brands, Study Says

Posted by Dale Buss on April 1, 2010 04:01 PM

Newspapers have faced decades – and especially two intense years – of unrelenting bad headlines about their own industry. But a new report by McKinsey suggests reasons for optimism for the business, based largely on the possibilities for building on the trust level that the industry brand has established with consumers.

Nearly every week for the last few years, some major newspaper or chain has reported circulation declines, layoffs or other nasty developments. These have set off major structural changes which have laid low even the titans of the medium. Practically no brand has been able to escape the effects of a perfect storm in the newspaper marketplace: abysmal levels of advertising because of the economy, rising competition from Internet and TV news, and to some extent a greater level of suspicion by the American people in the very institution of newspapering.

But now in its McKinsey Quarterly magazine, the renowned consulting firm says that – based on its own research largely conducted in the UK – “newspapers have an important inherent advantage as they face the challenges of the digital age – trust.” Consumers trust newspapers more than any other medium, McKinsey says, and 66 percent actually trust newspaper advertising as “informative and confidence inspiring” versus just 44 percent who feel that way about TV and only 12 percent for the web.

To a great extent, McKinsey says, newspaper brands haven’t done nearly enough to leverage this strong residual trust that consumers have in their brands. Yes, most have gone online, and now many of them are making their first serious attempts at monetizing their internet content.

But as the firm points out, even if newspapers charge only a fraction for their online content compared with what they charge for a print subscription, only a fraction of news mavens said they would pay.

Rather, newspapers should try to leverage this innate confidence in their brands in other ways, McKinsey suggests, such as using their call centers to administer bookings for advertised offers to test-drive new car models or partnering with travel agencies to offer exclusive tours to subscribers.

So newspapers will have to continue to blur the traditional lines between editorial content and advertising, and other marketing efforts, for their brands to survive in leaner times and a digital age. At this point, it doesn’t seem that too many newspaper brands are up for this challenge.

Comments

Mark Australia says:

If newspapers were to be more explicit in communicating this competitive advantage of "Trust", would it be enough to maintain/increase circulation, and make newspapers the better alternative to online?
For example, this "Trust" theme could be the inspiration for the paper's title, promotional strategy, and so on.  

April 1, 2010 11:54 PM #

Christina Meetoo says:

"So newspapers will have to continue to blur the traditional lines between editorial content and advertising, and other marketing effort"

If trust is their inherent advantage, blurring the lines between advertising and editorial content would surely further undermine thus trust.

Newspapers need to be able to recapture advertising revenues simply by providing interesting and reliable information to drive audiences to their sites. The downturn in their business is not due to the rise of the Internet per se (which was merely an accelerator). Cutting down on good journalism was the root cause of it all.

The text itself says that the greater level of suspicion in newspapering was also a cause...

Christina Meetoo
(from Mauritius)

April 2, 2010 06:34 AM #

Susan Gildersleeve United States says:

There's a commitment that goes with the willingness to 'put it in writing.'  Readers have more reason to trust something they see in print than in almost any other medium.  As consumers of print, we assign newspaper writers and editors the conceit of having asked the tough questions for us.  

Where their revenue will come from will be:
1. Continuing to prove that they're the ones who ask the tough questions on our behalf
2. Making their product easier to consume (e.g., make articles 'skimmable' by intelligent use of bolds, bullets and white space).

Our cultural breeding makes us reading-resistant - a heading, sub-heading along with two or three call-outs are rarely enough to interest me in reading wall-to-wall small print - especially given past disappointments of not having found enough 'meat' to have merited my investment. Savvy editors will welcome the challenge of changing the face of journalistic narrative to make it consumable at many speeds and levels.

The increased cost in editorial oversight could be partly recouped by reclaiming unneeded column inches.

April 2, 2010 09:08 AM #

cheap replica handbags People's Republic of China says:

4444  
Our cultural breeding makes us reading-resistant - a heading, sub-heading along with two or three call-outs are rarely enough to interest me in reading wall-to-wall small print - especially given past disappointments of not having found enough 'meat' to have merited my investment. Savvy editors will welcome the challenge of changing the face of journalistic narrative to make it consumable at many speeds and levels.

April 12, 2010 11:47 PM #

Comments are closed

What Branders are Saying on Twitter

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameoThe Avengers
Acura leads brand blitz
Martin LindstromMartin Lindstrom:
On Brandwashing, Brand Ethics, and Privacy
debateJoin the Debate
What's your can't live without brand?
BPBP
Back in Business?
Michael Stone and Nancy BaileyMove Over Mad Men: Here Come the Brand Licensors
Beanstalk's Michael Stone & Nancy Bailey
Digital Watch: WahlWahl Climbing
Wahl’s Digital Branding
paperThe Millennial Consumer: Debunking Stereotypes
The latest from The Boston Consulting Group
Jeff Weedman
P&G's Jeff Weedman

Connect + Develop Your Career
Marketing to the New MajorityBranding 123
By Barry Silverstein