Interbrand IQ: The Best Asian Brands Issue

rss

media brands

Hef's Bid to Take Playboy Private: Smoke and Mirrors?

Posted by Shirley Brady on July 12, 2010 04:45 PM

Don't be fooled by Hugh Hefner's mellow demeanor and smoking jacket. The Playboy founder, who's 84, showed there's spark left in his pipe by announcing an offer today to buy up any shares he doesn't already own in a surprise bid to take the adult entertainment private. He may have foreshadowed the move in a veiled tweet on Friday.

In his proposal to Playboy Enterprise Inc.'s board, Hefner stated that, out of respect for the brand and the editorial direction of the magazine, he is not interested in any sale or merger of Playboy to other bidders, or in selling his shares.

Shortly after his proposal—which is not yet a formal offer—was made public, Penthouse owner FriendFinder Networks said it would make a formal bid for its longtime rival, prompting shares to soar as investors scrambled to respond. RBC analyst David Bank told Bloomberg TV he believes Hefner's move was motivated by a belief the brand is  undervalued on Wall Street.

"It's yet another demonstration of the power of content in media," Bank commented. "A lot of people associate Playboy with the adult entertainment business, but (it's) an incredibly underleveraged brand."

The analyst also mentioned the brand's international licensing deals, with its name and logo "on everything from energy drinks to casinos," which may also explain why it's losing money: overlicensing. Brandchannel's Abe Sauer accused Playboy of being in "a race to the bottom" earlier this year, after Hefner was sued by Playboy shareholders in February.

Hefner may have given a hint of where he sees the brand's growth in a recent Q&A in the New York Times. "To begin with, it was the magazine that carried the brand; now the brand carries the magazine," he said. "We have merchandise that we sell all over, like clothing. We’re one of the main men’s upscale brands on the mainland of Red China, where the magazine is not yet permitted."

Playboy recently implemented layoffs and eliminated its corporate controller position. Now Hefner, who made his offer with the backing of a private equity firm, is concerned about the future of the company he founded in 1953. His daughter Christie stepped down as CEO last year after more than 20 years on the job.

The Wall Street Journal speculates that Hef may be "trying to smoke out another bidder." Marketwatch's Jon Friedman muses that Hefner's action is indicative of persistent tough times for media brands, not to mention the wear and tear on Hef's personal brand:

"Playboy's identity stems from its magazine, featuring scantily clad women, pithy lifestyle features and long interviews with celebrities. Building on those components, Hefner also brilliantly marketed himself as America's timeless swinger. But he is now 84 years old, and his image has taken a hit as he has gone from the grand old man of publishing to something less flattering.

Hefner has always had an impeccable sense of timing. He proved it by capitalizing on America's post-World War II's attitudes toward sexual content. Perhaps, once again, he will lead media companies — this time down the path of going private."

As Marketwatch notes, in 2006 the company's revenue stood at $331 million, down from $347 million in 1999. By last year, the figure had dropped to $240 million. The flagship magazine's circulation peaked at 7.1 million in late 1972. By last year, it was down to 2.6 million; in October, Playboy reduced its rate base to 1.5 million print subscribers, where it stands now.

Having also expressed interest in saving the Hollywood sign in addition to (now) his flagship business, Hefner's clearly thinking about his personal legacy. (As he quipped at the Iron Man 2 premiere above, the one super-power he'd love is immortality.)

Indeed, he tweeted two days ago: "In the bio-pic of my life, I think Robert Downey Jr would be a natural & has expressed interest. Chaplin, Iron Man & Hef. cool."

Comments

A Sauer United States says:

From a purely emotional standpoint, and not forgetting Hef is a shark and sly businessman, one has to wonder if an old man, facing not just winter but the END of winter, is finally worried about his legacy, at the very least during his own time.

PLayboy was rushing to devalue its brand so fast that there was a real possibility Hef would live to see him and his brand as a punchline in his own time. It's a true possibility that he could;t face that… as long as he lived. A business move for sure, but for a brand as driven by a singular personality as Playboy, a brand that was created almost by a single guy's raw willpower, there remains a human element. As Shiirley notes, Hef seems more interested lately in boasting about doing good deeds, not blondes. Crazy enough, the philanthropist philanderer's personal brand just might be what an aging Playboy needs.

July 12, 2010 04:57 PM #

Muraculous Canada says:

Truth is that the boomers are the ones who supported Playboy, much as they supported the record industry.  With the natural decline in their spending on this sort of entertainment, Playboy could have taken concrete steps to: A. Follow their audience, B. Lead the way in on-line content provision, C. Join together with an outlet such as Spice Channel, D. Join together with, or establish, social networking sites and on-line dating portals, E. Expand their core business rather than frittering away their value on cheap licensing deals.

Because they did little to counter these domestic trends, under the CEO-ship of Christie Hefner, they missed the/an opportunity to remain a leader.  The internet has only accentuated and accelerated the result.

Moreover, Playboy's tasteful (even wholesome) graphical content has lost ground to much nastier print and on-line products that, while a little disgusting (a lot disgusting in some cases), have garnered substantial audiences. It may be that the mainstream has had its fill of these side-show curiosities and now regards them as the garbage they truly are - if true, fortunate for Playboy.

Acquisitions:  Playboy should have been making them.  An example of one competitor that should have been purchased by Playboy is "Girls Gone Wild".  Why? Because it matches well with Playboy's overall philosophy of good clean fun and drafts a newer, younger audience.  Playboy could also have issued a branded pre-paid credit card for University-aged students and enlisted men to use to purchase its services/products.  Both the college market and armed services markets have been huge for Playboy over the years.

Sounds like Mr. Hefner is serious about stopping the leaks and reining-in the run on quantity over quality.  Should work if handled expertly.

July 13, 2010 11:01 AM #

Comments are closed

Brand Chatter on Twitter

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameo2013 Product Placement Awards
Which brand is most bullish on Hollywood?
Coca-ColaIt's the Journey That Matters:
Coca-Cola Opens Up With Story-Based Web Refresh
debateJoin the Debate
What makes a great brand?
BPBP
Branding Comeback Challenges
Denise Lee YohnLance Armstrong’s Brand
Denise Lee Yohn Weighs In
Digital Watch: WahlAT&T
Rethinking Possible With Transmedia Storytelling
paperGlobal Competitive [Ad]vantage
The latest from GeoEdge
Sheryl Connelly
Sheryl Connelly

Meet Ford's Resident Futurist
Marketing to the New MajorityBranding 123
A primer by Barry Silverstein