Interbrand IQ: The Best Asian Brands Issue

rss

health matters

Michelle Obama Urges Restaurants to Step Up

Posted by Dale Buss on September 14, 2010 02:30 PM

As First Lady, Michelle Obama may have learned how to influence people – but she may not have that “making friends” thing down. Just ask America’s restaurant operators. Mrs. Obama addressed the board of the National Restaurant Association on Monday to talk about her childhood-obesity initiative, and her tone was far more provocative than friendly.

Essentially, the First Lady insisted, America’s restaurant operators are contributing far too little to the fight against childhood obesity, with one out of three American kids overweight or obese. And if they need ideas on how to offer healthier menu options, the First Lady has got some.

Sure, Mrs. Obama thanked the folks for what they’re already doing. But mainly she was there to assert her view that restaurants, which receive half of a family's food budget, are shirking their crucial role in helping American parents thwart obesity in their kids.

All of that, you know, "giving the children what they want to eat and what their parents want to buy them"? It has to stop, the First Lady said.

“These [menu] choices have to be easy to make and they have to give parents the confidence to know that they can go into any restaurant in this country and choose a genuinely healthy meal for their kids,” she told the restaurant association.

Any restaurant? Well, in case they missed her point, Mrs. Obama also told the restaurant chieftains to stop trying to get Americans to buy their products.

“Let’s be clear,” she said, borrowing a favorite “look-at-me-when-I’m-speaking-to-you” phrase from her husband. “It’s not enough just to limit ads for foods that aren’t healthy. It’s also going to be critical to increase marketing for foods that are healthy.”

Now, when it comes to menu options, Mrs. Obama had some advice as well. Of course she loves the idea of adding carrots and apple slices as choices for kids, but she thinks that consumers also should have to specifically ask for French fries in kids’ meals – even though, by her own admission, the First Lady is “a fry lover.”

And have restaurant operators thought of these options suggested by the Dietitian in Chief?: offering low-fat milk, maybe cutting the butter and cream in recipes, substituting tasty whole wheat pasta for that nasty semolina? After all, recipe formulation is their business, so certainly none of these ideas have been tried.

Apparently, Mrs. Obama was unaware of the thousands of menu alterations American restaurants already have made over the past decade in the direction of healthier options, in many cases already trying to take consumers where they don’t really want to go.

Why didn’t you just get it over with, Mrs. Obama, and hand out acceptable menus from the podium?

(For part 2 of the above video of her keynote address, click here).

Comments

momisonacid United States says:

Politician should not be making diet recommendations for anyone. As much as we would love to believe we are all the same that is just not the case. There are multiple health issues out there that require special diets. A one size fits all diet will not work for everyone in part to special health needs and genetics.

Not to mention science is always coming up with new information concerning what is healthy and what is not. For instance:

Fructose is bad now regardless if it comes from high fructose corn syrup or fruit.

http://www.jci.org/articles/view/37385

http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/88/5/1189

wholehealthsource.blogspot.com/.../...c-index.html

And saturated fat appears not to cause heart disease now:

jcem.endojournals.org/.../1617

jama.ama-assn.org/.../43

www.atkins.com/.../...-Cardiovascular-Disease.aspx

Not to mention that health concerns may have more to do with the bacteria that live in our intestines than the foods we eat:

www.npr.org/.../story.php

www.wellnessresources.com/.../

www.npr.org/.../story.php?storyId=95900616

The bottom line is we do not know everything that we need to know regarding human metabolism yet and government intervention into diet could cause more harm than good.

September 14, 2010 07:38 PM #

Daniel Reed United Kingdom says:

I cannot see Michelle obama can change the states eating habits overnight and asking just restaurants to help with the fight is not real key problem is it where excess eating is the problem is it first lady> its teaching parents to eat healthy within the home then onto food chains not str8 onto food chains first lady obama food education needs to change in the home otherwise what's the point restaurants offering healthy food when u can go home to fridges full of fatty foods? Also eating far more than your body needs in the states seems a good thing when it is definitely isn't in the uk we do eat bad foods but I personally we a far far more aware on healthy food than in the us in what I have seen on programmes on various life's of us families which is not a attack on any us family directly so please don't take it as a insult please guys. I am going only what I have obervered on uk and some us and some aboard TV channels for example I could for the life of eat a extra extra large mc donalds us size at all as portions are ridiculous where in the uk our large would I say seeing us portion sizes would yr medium size mc donalds I fairly say and I have had many m8s whom been to the states and loved but.. the one main thing I hear constant complaint of how much food is put onto their plates and they tell dan I only had 1 meal a day in the states because the portions are so big compared to being at home and I have heard this comment from more than once.  As I have michelle obama needs to help families and not moan at restaurants as she is doing shes to help parents again to premote healthy eating and fitness. Plz not to us people I love us people so plz plz don't see my comment as a personal attack on u guys as I think u r great people its just the huge portions are just huge in homes and in food outlets in the us thats all.  

September 14, 2010 09:40 PM #

Sandile South Africa says:

This is a really good move by the first lady. Restaurants may or may not have been a good place to start influencing people's eating habits, nonetheless, it is a start. Also, it's true that people are very diverse, in terms of  food requirements, what they have access too and what they can afford and so forth but still - as I said before, something needed to be said and done and the first lady has gotten that in motion. That I commend and I hope she gets the support because it is a fact that obesity is a 'killer' problem and the main causes of it are bad, processed, unhealthy foods that are sometimes taken in huge quantities. The one other reason why people that eat unhealthy foods would eat a lot, is because the body requires that which they do not get from healthier options and they constantly having to eat more and more to make up for the 'lack'.

September 15, 2010 04:02 AM #

Colette Ireland says:

Excellent speech by Michelle Obama - very well thought through and clear.  I hope that she gets full support from people.  People will always fight against what is right because of their own motivations, but what Michelle is saying and standing for is correct.  Restaurants have a responsibility and duty of care to offer healthy options, other bodies inform parents and children of what they are eating.  Ultimately what people put in their body is up to them, but as a society, we have to give everyone the best possible chat.  You can bring a horse to water, but you can't make him drink - but we need to at least bring people to the water...

September 15, 2010 07:20 AM #

E Denison Japan says:

American obesity, and specifically childhood obesity are indeed serious problems.  However, I don't believe that making limitations on what products are available, or pressuring restaurants to make access to products more limited, is in the spirit of capitalism, nor the domain of the US government.

I believe that government efforts should be directed toward continuing food health education, both to children and adults. In other words, the government shouldn't be interfering with supply, but should rather be trying to influence demand. It is ultimately the consumer's decision as to what they shall eat.

The truth is, healthy food is available, you just have to go to the right places or make the right decisions. What America needs is a better awareness of what the right decisions are, what the consequences of the wrong decisions can be, and the knowledge of how to obtain the healthy choices in an affordable, accessible, (and desirable) way.

September 15, 2010 08:24 AM #

Elliott Krejci United States says:

I agree with Daniel and momisonacid: Michelle get out of our restaurants and Parents do your jobs by educating yourselves and make the best decisions you can for your children's and your own health.

September 15, 2010 10:03 AM #

Andrew Langdell United States says:

Here's an interesting insight: 2 commenters are angry, 2 commenters are pleased with her statements. Of the two that are pleased, neither are from the US. Hmmm....

Elliott brings up a great point that parents and the populace at large do need to be educated. They also need to make the "best" decisions possible. The issue is: What happens when their neither educated nor able to make "best" decisions? Maybe, just maybe, having something healthy on the menu as a default could help all of us out there and lead to a lower obeisity rate, lower healthcare costs and a happier population.

Or we could just continue to stuff our fat faces with french fries. At least we'll die happy.

Momisonacid, we do know what we need to know and Daniel Reed points it out: We eat too much goddamn food. End of story. Want to fix the obeisity problem, put less food on plates. Every diet program every invented involves caloric restriction. To say there is no solution is simply a false statement. To say there is no easy solution is closer to the truth.

At the end of the day, what Elliott says is true. The fear many of us have is what do we do until we have those educated neighbors whose FUPAs and GUNTs aren't on display for the rest of the world to see?

Maybe encouraging, or even demanding, that our national restaurant chains step in and become part of the solution by OFFERING healthier options is a small step in the right direction. And we need a ton of steps.

Pax.

September 15, 2010 10:31 AM #

MAXWELL OFORI NKRUMAH says:

The irony is that the answer to Obesity is in Africa.Maybe Americans can learn from researching into the ingredients of traditional African  diets, especially Ghana and Nigeria.

The may not have to cook the same but they can get insight into what is really "obessing" them.
Americans love chickens too much!

SET THE CHICKENS FREE! FREEDOM FOR CHICKEN REPUBLIC means FREEDOM FOR OBESE CONTINENT.

September 15, 2010 04:47 PM #

su hong Austria says:

Dear customers, thank you for your support of our company.
Here, there's good news to tell you: The company recently
launched a number of new fashion items! ! Fashionable
and welcome everyone to come buy. If necessary, please
plut: www.newgoin.com

We need your support and trust!
╰—┘ 。 ┅★`_、

September 18, 2010 12:09 PM #

Comments are closed

Brand Chatter on Twitter

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameo2013 Product Placement Awards
Which brand is most bullish on Hollywood?
Coca-ColaIt's the Journey That Matters:
Coca-Cola Opens Up With Story-Based Web Refresh
debateJoin the Debate
What makes a great brand?
BPBP
Branding Comeback Challenges
Denise Lee YohnLance Armstrong’s Brand
Denise Lee Yohn Weighs In
Digital Watch: WahlAT&T
Rethinking Possible With Transmedia Storytelling
paperGlobal Competitive [Ad]vantage
The latest from GeoEdge
Sheryl Connelly
Sheryl Connelly

Meet Ford's Resident Futurist
Marketing to the New MajorityBranding 123
A primer by Barry Silverstein