Meta-Luxury

rss

uphill battles

Gapocalypse! Gap President Takes to HuffPo to Defend Logo

Posted by Abe Sauer on October 8, 2010 09:30 AM

If there is one place all brands know to turn when the time comes to show some humility, contrition and beg for understanding, it's the Huffington Post. Wait, what?

After two days of Gapocalypse (Gapgate?), the brand is finally speaking out. In what seems like the most rational branding move of Gap's latest branding moves, Gap President Marka Hansen took to The Huffington Post in a column meant to explain the logo change. Hansen writes:

"The natural step for us on this journey is to see how our logo - one that we've had for more than 20 years - should evolve. Our brand and our clothes are changing and rethinking our logo is part of aligning with that. We want our customers to take notice of Gap and see what it stands for today."

OK. Go on.

"...we plan to ask people to share their designs with us as well. We welcome the participation we've seen so far. We'll explain specifics on how everyone can share designs in a few days. Thank you to everyone who has already shared feedback. I'm excited about continuing the conversation and believe passionately in where we're taking our brand."

In the middle there somewhere, Hansen repeats what we can only imagine are the selling points Gap got suckered with by its agency:

"We chose this design as it's more contemporary and current. It honors our heritage through the blue box while still taking it forward."

By going on the crowded brothel of innuendo and misinformation that is HuffPo, Gap is now sharing marketing and promotional strategies with quack doctors looking to sell the sure-fire longevity cure and self-promoting celebrities posing as news items (PHOTOS).

Corporate communications VP Bill Chandler also tells Fast Company's Co.Design blog that "Gap stands by the logo they've created, they also want it to signify that the company itself is changing — and that should come with input from consumers." It's a brilliant PR move; once something blows up, invite the public to help you make it better with their suggestions. It's a win-win!

Chandler implies that the logo was floated on Gap's website as a catalyst for a public debate (in which case, why not announce a contest and formally invite public submissions in a 'Redesign Our Logo!' competition?):

They debuted the logo "without much fanfare" to begin the conversation, says Chandler, who also notes... that the use of Helvetica was not new — they've been incorporating it into their advertising and some retail stores for the past year. It's also not a stab at going retro, says Chandler. "We believe this is a more contemporary, modern expression," he says. "The only nod to the past is that there's still a blue box, but it looks forward."

Honestly, we're beginning to feel a little sorry for the Gap in the wake of the free-for-all fallout. Let's start looking at the positive. What is Gap's next best move? Pretend it never happened is starting to look pretty good.

More about: , , ,

Comments

Rick United States says:

"Gap is now sharing marketing and promotional strategies with quack doctors looking to sell the sure-fire longevity cure and self-promoting celebrities posing as news items"

Brilliant! It's a homeopathic logo!

October 8, 2010 10:18 AM #

Gunter Soydanbay Canada says:

I hear GAP is interested in crowd-sourcing their logo. Forgive my ignorance, but have they issued a formal design brief? They say, the company is changing and they want the new logo to represent this change. But what is this change is about? They launched the new logo so quietly. Is this how you communicate change?

In the absence of corporate and brand strategy, this is just a design exercise. Without clear criteria, I guess this would turn into one of the biggest PR failures of all times.

October 8, 2010 11:11 AM #

Erik United States says:

First off, Trey Laird is a hack. It's obvious to any designer worth a damn.

Second, it's awesome when companies have a mediocre product, and then think the problem lies in their marketing or with their company logo.

Marka Hansen obviously hasn't a clue what makes a good logo and what constitutes good design. That logo is an obvious result of decision by committee. "It was well-received internally." Really? Well, it sounds like HR needs to start handing out some pink slips then.

Ms. Hansen also hasn't figured out people stopped going to her stores because people don't want to spend $40 on a neon green tank top. Start making clothes that are cool, and people will go back to your store.

October 8, 2010 01:28 PM #

Steve Biggerstaff United States says:

"What is Gap's next best move?"

Simple.  Starting with the CEO, Gap should focus on their business and ignore the brouhaha about their logo.  

Seriously, what responsible CEO would spend time defending a logo change?  Sell it in internally – absolutely.  Preview it with key external stakeholders – nice move.  But getting mired down in the blogosphere defending it after the fact?  Would you do that with your real estate expansion strategy? Your management development program?  Your in-store merchandising, pricing and mark-down plans?

Get on to the business of delivering a product mix, value proposition and shopping experience that is once again relevant and compelling. When you do that, your logo – old, new or crowdsourced – will be just fine … basking in the kind of brand equity that gives meaning to the logo.  Not the other way around.

October 11, 2010 11:06 AM #

Kiragu Gichuri Kenya says:


I agree with Steve above. Do not rely on a NEW logo to help turn business around. Remember, you are what we (consumers) say you are, not the other way round.

Once you cater to the consumers, they will build up your brand equity and your logo will be just fine.

October 12, 2010 09:41 AM #

Daryle United States says:

It's brilliant in a idiotic way. Completely screw up your logo then say, yea and you can help ... through some dingy propaganda internet rag? Brilliant!

October 12, 2010 12:33 PM #

jeffreyalansmith United States says:

The reaction to the new Gap logo is proof that Gap customers hold the brand close to their hearts. Don't mess with it. CEO "You make the same clothes you made 20 years ago -- what's really new? Nothing. Oh, wait, now you make the worst men's underwear on the market. That's new! And that impression of your bad underwear IS your brand, in my mind."  The new logo is so banal, it could stand for an aerospace or software company. There is nothing 'clothing' about it. And the blue square? Please...

October 12, 2010 03:26 PM #

Comments are closed

What Branders are Saying on Twitter

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameoThe Avengers
Acura leads brand blitz
Martin LindstromMartin Lindstrom:
On Brandwashing, Brand Ethics, and Privacy
debateJoin the Debate
What's your can't live without brand?
BPBP
Back in Business?
Michael Stone and Nancy BaileyMove Over Mad Men: Here Come the Brand Licensors
Beanstalk's Michael Stone & Nancy Bailey
Digital Watch: WahlWahl Climbing
Wahl’s Digital Branding
paperThe Millennial Consumer: Debunking Stereotypes
The latest from The Boston Consulting Group
Jeff Weedman
P&G's Jeff Weedman

Connect + Develop Your Career
Marketing to the New MajorityBranding 123
By Barry Silverstein