Interbrand IQ: The Best Asian Brands Issue

rss

brand extensions

Jeep Runs Risk of Special Edition Fatigue

Posted by Abe Sauer on October 21, 2010 12:00 PM

Apparently, sitting on the couch and pretending to be skilled or brave enough to go into combat is not enough for some people. Now, those same video gamers who love the first person shooter franchise Call of Duty can drive around town to get more Doritos while pretending to be part of some important "black op."

Or, at least, that's what the Jeep brand (and its parent company) are hoping. Next month, Chrysler releases a special edition of the Jeep Wrangler model — behold, the 2011 Jeep Wrangler Call of Duty: Black Ops Edition, above. It's a fierce-looking beast, but will Jeep fans and fans of the video game bite?

Jeep says the limited edition model, to be released on Nov. 9 in tandem with the new video game of the same name, "is based on the Jeep Wrangler Rubicon model and features dark Rubicon wheels in a high-gloss Mineral Gray. The vehicle's exterior color is black and features Call of Duty: Black Ops graphics on the roof and front quarter panels… Inspired by Call of Duty: Black Ops, the new limited-edition Wrangler delivers legendary Jeep capability, aggressive 32-inch off-road tires, live axles with locking differentials in the front and rear, and a two-speed transfer case."

Operation Secure Mountain Dew, commence! Hooah!

Brand licenses on automobiles are a well-worn strategy. The 1990s saw the Eddie Bauer Special Edition Ford Explorer. Then there was the Lexus Coach Edition ES 300. When Ford revised its Mustang model to "retro," it wisely went with a film-themed Bullitt special edition. Ford maintains a licensing deal with Harley-Davidson for its Ford F-150 trucks. More recently, Dodge teamed up with race-outfitting brand Mopar for the 2011 Mopar Dodge Challenger R/T.

Of course, the great irony of Jeep's Call of Duty tie-in is that the brand's reputation and fame was formed in actual combat with real gunfire and blood and guts.

Jeep is not new to the special edition game at all ... nor is it new to failing at this game. Before Ford rolled its first Bullitt Mustang off the assembly line, Jeep released a special edition Wrangler Rubicon modeled on the Angelina Jolie film Tomb Rader 2.

In fact, Jeep's bigger problem with this "black ops" edition is that — much like real black ops — those undertaking them tend to get in trouble in the long run.

Before the "Call of Duty" special edition came along, Jeep aficionados were already grumbling about the brand's overused practice of rolling out "special edition" after "special edition," particularly where the specialness of the edition was little more than a few options packages and a hood emblem.

Comments

Mike United States says:

Slight correction . . . Mopar is the performance division of Chrysler, so that comparo doesn't really fit.  But getting back to the issue at hand - a vehicle co-branded with a video game?!?! For real?!?!  Unless you're 16 years old (which let's face it, almost no 16 year-olds can afford this Jeep), wouldn't you feel like a huge dork owning a vehicle named after a video game?  I can't imagine this will go over well.

October 21, 2010 02:04 PM #

A Sauer United States says:

Good point re: Mopar; that makes it more of a "special edition" than an extension/license of some kind. As for video games, I think you;d find the demographics shocking (I do). A 2009 study found that the average "gamer" was 35 and that over a quarter of gamers are over 50. Now, that's not exclusively first person shooters, which prob skew a little younger, but teenagers are by no means the gaming demo anymore.

October 21, 2010 02:44 PM #

Bruce Philp Canada says:

Once upon a time, every vehicle bearing the Jeep name was tested on the Rubicon Trail. It didn't matter how much or how little you spent, you felt that by buying one you were attaching yourself to a tradition, one of the last remaining authentic franchises in car marketing. They lost me with "Trail Rated". Now, you could buy a Jeep that can really do stuff, or one that just looks like it can. It was all - pardon the pun - downhill from there. I'm always a bit stunned when I see a marketer trade away something they can never get back, in exchange for the vague possibility of more market reach. A bit like Jack and the Beanstalk, come to think of it.

If you're interested, I just yesterday blogged on one car brand that declined to buy the beans: http://www.brandcowboy.com

October 22, 2010 10:11 AM #

Comments are closed

Brand Chatter on Twitter

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameo2013 Product Placement Awards
Which brand is most bullish on Hollywood?
Coca-ColaIt's the Journey That Matters:
Coca-Cola Opens Up With Story-Based Web Refresh
debateJoin the Debate
What makes a great brand?
BPBP
Branding Comeback Challenges
Denise Lee YohnLance Armstrong’s Brand
Denise Lee Yohn Weighs In
Digital Watch: WahlAT&T
Rethinking Possible With Transmedia Storytelling
paperGlobal Competitive [Ad]vantage
The latest from GeoEdge
Sheryl Connelly
Sheryl Connelly

Meet Ford's Resident Futurist
Marketing to the New MajorityBranding 123
A primer by Barry Silverstein