Learn more about Sustainable Brands 2015 San Diego


'Megamind' Confirms Dreamworks Animation Has Abandoned Product Placement

Posted by Abe Sauer on November 8, 2010 03:40 PM

The Dreamworks Animation studio's box office hit Megamind took it to the bank this weekend, taking in close to $50 million and contributing to setting a first weekend of November box office record.

Megamind also represents a landmark in product placement for animated films. Not because Megamind is chock full of product placement; but because the film is almost completely free of recognizable products. In fact, the only brand name that can be found in the whole film (Jean Paul Gaultier) is spoken in a passing joke about men's cologne.

What's more, Megamind also has no product placement "jokes," the likes of which were so prevalent in the Shrek series. That is, until the most recent Shrek film, another brand-less children's film that signaled the trend that Megamind now confirms. Product placement in animated children's films might be dead.

The last decade of Dreamworks Animation films is a perfect case study of how the popularity of product placement in children's films has waned and brought the studio back to where it began.

In 2001, the studio's first film, Shrek, featured zero brands. There were a few jokes about Disney, but mostly the film was clear of product placement. Three years later, that all changed with the release of the studio's blockbusters Shark Tale and Shrek 2. Both films featured only a few real product mentions, yet were packed to the gills with product placement jokes. For example, both spoofed versions of Burger King ("Burger Prince," "Fish King") and Old Navy ("Old Knavery," "Old Wavy"). Shark Tale, a movie that takes place underwater, features an improbable product placement joke about the donut brand Krispy Kreme ("Kruppy Kreme")  Parents began to grumble. A year later, Dreamworks' Madagascar featured over 20 product placements, including the real Krispy Kreme. Only the "Spalding" joke on Castaway's "Wilson" was forgivable.

In 2007, the studio's two hit animated films Bee Movie and Shrek 3 were more of the same, with the former featuring, amongst others, Cinnabon and the latter a cornucopia of product jokes including Versachery and Ye Olde Foot Locker.

Shrek 3, a children's film, was an all new low for Dreamworks as it included a product placement joke about, no kidding, "Ye Old Hooters."

But then in 2008, something started to change. The studio released two films (Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa and Kung Fu Panda) that between them only featured one branded product (Apple). This trend continued a year later with the Dreamworks' film Monsters and Aliens with only one visible product.

Now, 2010, where all three of Dreamworks Animation studio's blockbusters, Shrek: Forever After, How to Train Your Dragon, and Megamind, share but a single product placement amongst them. Next year will prove once and for all if Dreamworks Animation has gone product-free as the studio will release both Kung Fu Panda 2 and Shrek-offshoot Puss in Boots.

Dreamworks may have transitioned its films to remove product placement as an answer to parent criticism. But there is a practical reason to keep animated films free of product placement too: Longevity.

In fact, when it comes to product placement, Dreamworks Animation's films are beginning to resemble those of the market leader, Pixar. Pixar studios has always understood that keeping its films free of product placements increases those films' chances of achieving iconic status. The Incredibles, Monster, Inc, Wall-E, and Up feature but a couple products amongst them. Even Cars and the Toy Story franchise, which are fundamentally about brands (cars/toys), go to pains to remain free of products. Pixar's undersea film, Finding Nemo, remains a children's favorite, while Shark Tale loses relevance with each passing year.

Dreamworks may have come to realize this and flat-out copied Pixar's product placement blueprint when it came to Megamind. Indeed, Pixar's still wildly popular superhero comedy The Incredibles features almost zero product placements except for one inside joke... about men's cologne Hai Karate (below).

Go to Brandcameo for a full rundown of product placements in numerber one films so far this year.


Elliott Krejci United States says:

Abe, great article. I have thought of Dreamworks as the cheap imitation of pixar as if it should have the label before each movie, "compare to the ingredients of pixar". And recently began to look forward to them. I loved Monster v Aliens, Ku Fu Panda and How to Train Your Dragon. But the one thing that stood out to me is that the reason Shark Tale loses relevance each year was not the solely product placement, but that it was utterly the most terrible animated movie ever made. And it still stings that Will Smith and Jack Black where part of it. They literally crapped that movie out on the coat tails of Shrek and I took it hook line and sinker.

November 9, 2010 09:24 AM #

Tim New Zealand says:

Interesting article. Slightly naive though, given these animated movies exist to sell merchandise.

November 9, 2010 02:39 PM #

Elliott Krejci United States says:

Naivety is in the eye of the beholder. Your blanket statement is naive because you are not separating the Art from the crap. And in the end aren't we all existing to sell merchandise be it crap we make or ideas we think Wink

November 9, 2010 04:33 PM #

A Sauer United States says:

Tim, I have to disagree. I believe these movies exist to sell themselves. In years past, there was maybe one animated movie a year aimed at kinds. Now there are at least 5 (big features). Saturday morning cartoons were just about the only opp a week to catch toons. Now there are multiple cable channels which broadcast childrens' cartoons 24/7. Megamind's execution may not be as faultless, but fundamentally it is in no way different from the motivations that made critically acclaimed Up, or, for that matter, Avatar.

Star Wars. Now THERE is a film that exists solely to sell merchandise.  

November 9, 2010 04:58 PM #

Comments are closed

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameo2014 Product Placement Awards
Apple loses its crown to a new #1
Coca-ColaIt's the Journey That Matters:
Coca-Cola Opens Up With Story-Based Web Refresh
debateJoin the Debate
Is product placement a waste of money?
Arthur Chinski and Joshua Mizrahi
Model Behavior? Brands Beware
U.S. Legal Changes Impact Use of Brand Ambassadors
paperCorporate Citizenship in Canada
Fresh thinking from Interbrand
Sheryl Connelly
Sheryl Connelly

Meet Ford's Resident Futurist
Highlighting the Present—and Future—of Branding in Latin America and Iberia