Meta-Luxury

rss

branded media

Gawker Sheds Blog Status, Community - But Not Woes

Posted by Abe Sauer on February 11, 2011 04:00 PM

A Day in the Life of Gawker Media - FINAL from source/record on Vimeo.

The much ballyhooed Gawker.com redesign rolled out on Monday, with Gawker Media czar Nick Denton saving his flagship website for last as he rolled out the redesign across his other sites first.

More than just a a simple change in the look of the blog, Gawker's new format has been billed as an outright battle over the future of media strategy. It has already claimed several top Gawker personnel, including his head of ad sales, not to mention some of the site's regular readers and commenters.

The redesigned sites, which started going live across the Gawker Media family in early February, have become embattled islands of complaints, with Denton fighting back and defending his new format. When Gawker.com relaunched the day after the Super Bowl, there were tech hiccups — to be expected in the wake of its recent hacking, perhaps — such as the new design losing its Google News status.

In further defense of his choices, Denton posted the above video. It was the final straw for many of the site's loyal readers — whose wit and commentary drove more pageviews and return visits than Denton may realize.

Rather than jump in right away, we thought we'd give this a few days to settle in because most redesigned websites — particularly for such a high-profile digital brand with an active and loyal community — are adverse to change.  

But today we see a smoking of opinions from still-outraged Gawker commenters, many of them bearing the loyalty badge of being starred by the site's editors:

 

Ouch. Indeed, many of the site's most avid readers and commenters have fled to Crasstalk — a site they created in advance of the redesign.

The pageview-driven Denton, meanwhile, doesn't seem too concerned. He has been responding all week to complaints via his Twitter feed that anyone can switch back to a "blog view" (not the original interface, but a list of stories vs. the single-story view). 

He also commented to one Twitter complain that he's not using the term "blog" any more: "we're changing from blog to news site."

More than that — Denton is trying to bring his bellwether web brands into the same consideration set for advertisers as TV network brands, with a similar ad model and business plan.

(Below, a video uploaded to YouTube this week by a Gawker reader.)

Comments

Lisa Merriam United States says:

Consumers always hate change. Every brand design is always disliked. In this case it makes strategic sense. Given time, the haters will fade away. As the site becomes familiar, it will grow on you: merriamassociates.com/.../

February 11, 2011 11:28 PM #

Bob United Kingdom says:

That's something of a nonsense Lisa.

The Gawker site is disliked because it is functionally broken, incredibly awkward to navigate, literally impossible to navigate without a mousewheel ("screw you laptops and tablets!"), breaks established internet schema for no apparent reason than to confuse, and has jettisoned Gawker's USP: an incredibly intelligent and witty community for a public access website. People go there as much to read the comments as they do the flimsy content.

None of that makes "strategic sense", or whatever other vague fluffy term you want to brand it.

Pretending that the congressman story (probably Gawker's biggest mass-market scoop ever, including the iPhone 4), where they had their name splashed across the press and their writers interviewed on CNN and FOX, says anything at all about this layout's impact on pageviews is total cloud-cuckoo thinking.

Try a more intellectually honest comparison: the views for Jezebel, which didn't happen to have it's biggest story in 5 years on its front pages: views are down 34%. And apart from on pages talking about hideous redesign, it's like a ghosttown.

February 12, 2011 12:23 AM #

plala Canada says:

I am a longtime commenter on Gawker. The truth is, all of this publicity WILL bring in enough new users to replace those of us that have gone. They won't have any attachment to the old systems so Nick is correct in this aspect. Over the last year the new commenters have become dopier & trollier than ever- in no small part by baiting reddit & b/chan with 'scoops' and 'stories'.
So, whatever. I will miss it but 'it' is gone.
We go here now; http://www.crasstalk.com
Organic, chaotic and very, very commenty.

February 12, 2011 09:32 AM #

Comments are closed

What Branders are Saying on Twitter

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameoThe Avengers
Acura leads brand blitz
Martin LindstromMartin Lindstrom:
On Brandwashing, Brand Ethics, and Privacy
debateJoin the Debate
What's your can't live without brand?
BPBP
Back in Business?
Michael Stone and Nancy BaileyMove Over Mad Men: Here Come the Brand Licensors
Beanstalk's Michael Stone & Nancy Bailey
Digital Watch: WahlWahl Climbing
Wahl’s Digital Branding
paperThe Millennial Consumer: Debunking Stereotypes
The latest from The Boston Consulting Group
Jeff Weedman
P&G's Jeff Weedman

Connect + Develop Your Career
Marketing to the New MajorityBranding 123
By Barry Silverstein