Meta-Luxury

rss

customer relationship management

Starbucks Latest to Suffer "Black Guy" Receipt Scandal (UPDATED)

Posted by Abe Sauer on July 6, 2011 02:30 PM

Little is known about the photo at right, other than the fact that it was uploaded to i.imgur.com and then publicized by Buzzfeed.com. So we cover this with the proviso that it could be a hoax, but it's out there — and it's impacting the Starbucks brand.

It comes as mainstream media outlets (we're looking at you, TIME) are making hay this week with a Tumblr site that collects (and doesn't verify) user photos of their Starbucks order with misspelled (or just plain mangled) versions of customer names scrawled on the cup.

If this particular maligned Starbucks cup scrawl is real, it's a sign that Starbucks' internal brand engagement and employee training needs some work — and just the latest incident in a long line of poorly thought out moves by employees. Poorly thought out moves that cause loads of grief for the brands involved.

Way back in 2007, a New Jersey T-Mobile customer went into a US-1 Wireless store and left with a receipt printed "good morning my n***ers @ US 1 holla bak." The slur was chalked up to a bad internal joke not meant for distribution.

In 2008, the Kansas retail store Journeys found itself the subject of outrage when one of its employees printed "Dumb N***er" on a customer's receipt.

In February 2010, an African American Pizza Hut customer found "BIGBLACK" printed on a receipt where his name was supposed to be. Pizza Hut HQ offered an official apology and gift cards.

In August 2010, Domino's pizza's name got dragged through the mud when one of its employees issued a receipt to an African American patron with "N***ER DON'T TIP" printed on it.

Maybe worst of all was the April 2011 Landmark Steakhouse incident in which multiple receipts were issued with slurs like “McStinkyN***er" and "McNigSh*t." That led to a lawsuit against the California restaurant by one of its regular customers.

It seems, this isn't even solely an American "problem." In 2009, a British couple made the news after declaring outrage over their restaurant receipt that read, "UPSTAIRS BLK COUPLE."

While it would not have prevented it in the Starbucks example (which, we'll add, remains definitively unproven), maybe it's time the companies that make the register software create a patch that has a spam filter that blocks offensive terms. It would also save brands a ton of grief (and legal bils).

Moreover, examples like these are exactly why so many consumers believe fake examples such as the Twitter fiasco in June, when a photo of a (fake) sign in a McDonald's window charging African American customers an extra $1 fee swept the web and did untold damage to the McDonald's brand.

UPDATE: As our commenter below and a Twitter follower (thanks, David Thomas!) point out, the source of the photo of the Starbucks "Black Guy" cup was no less than NFL star Chad Ochocinco, who posted a pic of the cup and noted it was an "#EPIC moment when the white guy said my coffee was ready."

But this shouldn't ease Starbucks' execs' minds all that much. That tweet and photo upload was posted by Ochocinco (clearly a Starbucks regular) a month ago, on June 8th. The picture that's gone viral on Buzzfeed and continues to spread amongst tens of thousands has no explanation or source attached.

Comments

Alice United States says:

hey abe,

that cup was posted by NFL star Ocho Cinco. Probably best to learn the facts before you start posting articles.

July 6, 2011 03:12 PM #

A Sauer United States says:

Well, I think that's addressed here as it's stated that the source of the picture (and reason) is unknown. And that doesn't change the fact that it's gone viral and is currently being shared by tens of thousands of users with no idea what the source is.

July 6, 2011 03:36 PM #

Yeah Right United States says:

Do you really believe that the brand has been hurt?  I doubt it.  People know that this is a follow up stunt to the McD's stunt.  I don't think you are giving people enough credit for being able to think for themselves.  And can you actually quantify how bad the "the untold damage" to McD's was or is it simply hyperbole?

July 7, 2011 07:23 AM #

Robert Becker United States says:

Brandchannel probably did more damage to itself than the offending cup did to Starbucks. It was irresponsible to publish the story without researching it first.

The story seems to be about who owns the customer experience - the implication being that a retail business is responsible for everything that customers experience in its stores. That may be theoretically and even legally true, but it is morally ridiculous.

Retailers employ human beings, not robots, who continue to be human after they don a uniform and finish training. The store and the brand should not be deemed responsible for actions that are beyond their control and incongruous with their values, interest and brand promise.

July 7, 2011 11:14 AM #

bobbyj United States says:

Ocho trying to get publicity.......nnnnnoooooooooooooooooo

July 7, 2011 03:02 PM #

Sir says:

I don't understand what the big deal is?

Facts.

1. The guy is black so why would it be offensive to state the obvious, it's not like they wrote ni**er
2. This was done by an employe, it was not ordered by a manager.

Seems like a publicity stunt to me

July 11, 2011 04:15 AM #

Comments are closed

What Branders are Saying on Twitter

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameoThe Avengers
Acura leads brand blitz
Martin LindstromMartin Lindstrom:
On Brandwashing, Brand Ethics, and Privacy
debateJoin the Debate
What's your can't live without brand?
BPBP
Back in Business?
Michael Stone and Nancy BaileyMove Over Mad Men: Here Come the Brand Licensors
Beanstalk's Michael Stone & Nancy Bailey
Digital Watch: WahlWahl Climbing
Wahl’s Digital Branding
paperThe Millennial Consumer: Debunking Stereotypes
The latest from The Boston Consulting Group
Jeff Weedman
P&G's Jeff Weedman

Connect + Develop Your Career
Marketing to the New MajorityBranding 123
By Barry Silverstein