Meta-Luxury

rss

package design

Scary Labels Won't Snuff Out Cigarette Sales - Report

Posted by Mark J. Miller on July 11, 2011 10:00 AM

US cigarette manufacturers haven’t had to start selling the nine new pack designs that include nasty warning labels with images of rotting teeth, corpses, diseased lungs, and other such things on them but a new report will give them some hope.

The FDA requires that the new pack designs be sold starting in the fall of 2012, but a new report predicts that there won't be an immediate impact for Big Tobacco.

A new report from research firm IBISWorld predicts that the graphic packaging “will cause a decline of less than one percent in overall U.S. tobacco revenues in 2013,” ABC News reports.

IBISWorld projects that manufacturers will only lose about $300 million in sales annually, which is a minuscule portion of the estimated $43.8 billion the cigarette business brings in each year.

ABC points out, though, that the new packaging may curtail future revenue since it may help keep some from starting to smoke. "Gradually, the warnings could impact the smoking population," said IBISWorld cigarette and tobacco industry analyst Mary Gotaas, according to ABC. "But in the near term, it won't have much of an impact."

The site reports that the FDA is figuring the new packs will cause 213,000 people to stop smoking in 2013.

Deborah Mitchell, executive director of the Center for Brand and Product Management at the University of Wisconsin, also tells ABC that the size of the images will cause the brand names of cigarettes to be less pronounced and, in time, of less importance.

"A great brand like Marlboro, it's like they cast this spell," Mitchell said. "If the spell is broken, for example, with this really negative packaging ... all at once, Marlboro is just another brand of tobacco."

Comments

Joe Ray United States says:

Those are amazing numbers here - "...manufacturers will only lose about $300 million in sales annually, which is a minuscule portion of the estimated $43.8 billion the cigarette business brings in each year."

It will be interesting to see how the tobacco brands shift, move and work around this requirement. I don't agree with Ms. Mitchell that the less pronounced brands visible on packaging will break the spell. Savvy branding and designers will work around this obstacle, there are many possible ways around it. It's their mission to do this. I agree with her in wishing this were the case though.

I also wonder how long this requirement will be in effect. That $43.8 Billion income can buy an amazing amount of lobbying support and mind changing.

July 11, 2011 04:40 PM #

Con C Australia says:

Take a look at Australia. Our images are much more graphic, especially the mouth cancer image, and sales are so strong that they are now telling us that cigarettes will go into plain packs. That's right - no branding whatsoever!!!

July 12, 2011 03:01 AM #

Comments are closed

What Branders are Saying on Twitter

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameoThe Avengers
Acura leads brand blitz
Martin LindstromMartin Lindstrom:
On Brandwashing, Brand Ethics, and Privacy
debateJoin the Debate
What's your can't live without brand?
BPBP
Back in Business?
Michael Stone and Nancy BaileyMove Over Mad Men: Here Come the Brand Licensors
Beanstalk's Michael Stone & Nancy Bailey
Digital Watch: WahlWahl Climbing
Wahl’s Digital Branding
paperThe Millennial Consumer: Debunking Stereotypes
The latest from The Boston Consulting Group
Jeff Weedman
P&G's Jeff Weedman

Connect + Develop Your Career
Marketing to the New MajorityBranding 123
By Barry Silverstein