Interbrand IQ: The Best Asian Brands Issue

rss

logo-a-gogo

New GOP 2012 Convention Logo Ignores 47 States (Updated)

Posted by Abe Sauer on October 20, 2011 10:01 AM

The 2012 Republican National Convention will take place in Tampa Bay, Florida. The logo (above) selected by the Tampa Bay Host Committee caught flack after Republicans freaked out when some suggested — in all seriousness — that the logo's minaret "could be considered as Islamic 'Moorish Revival' architectural style." (The palm tree probably didn't help either.)

So when it came time for the GOP to select its event logo, the Grand Old Party tread carefully. Now, the official minaret-free 2012 Convention logo.

According to the Washington Post's piece on the logo, “The elephant—the proud and strong symbol of the Republican Party—with his trunk pointed toward 2012 reflects the spirit, unity and strength of our Party as we plan a successful 2012 Republican National Convention that enables us to march toward victory next November,” stated convention Chief Executive Officer William D. Harris.

Also: “The waves beneath Tampa Bay represent our beautiful host city’s location on the shore of the Gulf of Mexico,” said convention Chairman Alec Poitevint. “The three stars in the flag symbolize equality, justice and opportunity—core principles of our country’s Constitution and the founding tenets of the Republican Party.”

Still, the three-star salute of the RNC's new 2012 convention logo raises the question, why are Republicans refusing to recognize the statehood of the other 47 members of The Union?

 

Correction: Originally, this piece mistakenly referred to the Tampa Bay Host Committee logo as the first 2012 convention logo. The organizations are separate. 

More about: , , , ,

Comments

Stephen Nagy United States says:

Awful. Just awful.

Taking a professional-looking logo and replacing it with something devised by committee and put together in Powerpoint.

October 21, 2011 06:55 AM #

Work Together United States says:

They didn't want to cough up the extra money for a new logo. Judging by the [difference of] quality, I'm sure the first design wasn't cheap. Probably charged them more because the were the GOP. Us designers aren't exactly know for our conservative political standings Wink

*Charging a client more due to abrasive personality is called A$$hole Tax :-D

October 21, 2011 09:23 AM #

Chrissie United States says:

BOTH Logos are disgusting. The first one looks like an Islam convention and the corrected one they are disgracing our American Flag. USE the correct FLAG and stop all this politically BS. Shame on the people or person that did these logos.
I have been a Republican all my life and this makes me ashamed of my own party.

October 22, 2011 05:00 AM #

Comments are closed

Brand Chatter on Twitter

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameo2013 Product Placement Awards
Which brand is most bullish on Hollywood?
Coca-ColaIt's the Journey That Matters:
Coca-Cola Opens Up With Story-Based Web Refresh
debateJoin the Debate
What makes a great brand?
BPBP
Branding Comeback Challenges
Denise Lee YohnLance Armstrong’s Brand
Denise Lee Yohn Weighs In
Digital Watch: WahlAT&T
Rethinking Possible With Transmedia Storytelling
paperGlobal Competitive [Ad]vantage
The latest from GeoEdge
Sheryl Connelly
Sheryl Connelly

Meet Ford's Resident Futurist
Marketing to the New MajorityBranding 123
A primer by Barry Silverstein