political season

Sandy a New Chance for FEMA to Save Its Own Brand

Posted by Mark J. Miller on October 31, 2012 03:48 PM

The arrival of Superstorm Sandy has brought an American brand that plenty like to forget about back into the spotlight. FEMA, the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency, is generally not heard from as it goes about its business helping people recover from one nasty situation or another.

But when the agency flubs, as it famously did during its disastrous efforts after Hurricane Katrina in August of 2005, its name brings in a lot of bad publicity. After Sandy hit American soil and began devastating buildings and lives, FEMA was in action. As if on cue, Michael Brown, the man who had headed the agency during those Katrina days and resigned in disgrace in the month after the storm, appeared in Denver’s Westword magazine to talk about how President Obama had already blown it by meeting with FEMA on Sunday and having a press conference.

His suggestion was that Obama’s meeting was politically motivated (never mind that he also held a press conference at the American Red Cross) and somehow related to the loss of American lives in Benghazi back on Sept. 11. "My guess is, he wants to get ahead of it — he doesn't want anybody to accuse him of not being on top of it or not paying attention or playing politics in the middle of it," Brown told Westword. "He probably figured Sunday was a good day to do a press conference."

Brown’s comments, of course, came across as completely politically motivated. And his name reminded the world of just how poorly FEMA had handled Katrina. Was that what Sandy survivors had to look forward to? Current FEMA director Craig Fugate took the high road, telling NPR’s Morning Edition Wednesday, “It’s better to be fast than late.”

As an added bonus, FEMA suddenly became a political football in the U.S. presidential election. Republican candidate Mitt Romney has advocated many times that the federal government should hand whatever isn’t essential over to states to take care of and explicitly spoke about disaster relief in a 2011 debate. At that point, he told moderator John King, “We cannot afford to do those things without jeopardizing the future for our kids. It is simply immoral, in my view, for us to continue to rack up larger and larger debts and pass them on to our kids, knowing full well that we'll all be dead and gone before it's paid off. It makes no sense at all.”

While pushing such things to the states would take it out of the federal budget, it has never been clear exactly how the already cash-strapped states would pay for such things other than higher taxes.

Romney stayed quiet on the subject as the storm struck and Obama went about his business making sure Americans were safe, including meeting again with FEMA officials today before heading to New Jersey to survey the damage with NJ Governor Chris Christie.

But then Wednesday, Romney clarified his position on disaster relief: “I believe that FEMA plays a key role in working with states and localities to prepare for and respond to natural disasters,” Romney said in a statement, the Boston Globe reports. “As president, I will ensure FEMA has the funding it needs to fulfill its mission, while directing maximum resources to the first responders who work tirelessly to help those in need, because states and localities are in the best position to get aid to the individuals and communities affected by natural disasters.”

Of course, everyone has the right to change his or her mind, a situation that Romney is very familiar with since has done so on such things abortion and single-payer healthcare. Flexibility, of course, is a good thing to have as a politician, but one wonders where the people who called John Kerry a flip-flopper are hiding.

Meanwhile, FEMA seems to be getting good press right about now as it goes about its work helping Sandy’s victims. If all stays on course, when President tells Fugate that he’s doing a heckuva job, as President Bush did with his pal Brown, America will nod its approval instead of feel its collective jaws drop open. And that will be good for the FEMA brand.


Brownie United States says:

"This is the all-new FEMA, and the leadership is very, very good, very focused," said Dr. Irwin Redlener, a pediatrician and director of the National Center for Disaster Preparedness at Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. "They're doing an excellent job." Score one for FEMA's attempts to come back from its infamous failure after Katrina struck the Gulf Coast in August 2005. But the post-Sandy reviews for FEMA aren't all moonlight and roses...."


November 2, 2012 10:56 AM #

Comments are closed

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameo2014 Product Placement Awards
Apple loses its crown to a new #1
Coca-ColaIt's the Journey That Matters:
Coca-Cola Opens Up With Story-Based Web Refresh
debateJoin the Debate
Is product placement a waste of money?
Arthur Chinski and Joshua Mizrahi
Model Behavior? Brands Beware
U.S. Legal Changes Impact Use of Brand Ambassadors
paperCorporate Citizenship in Canada
Fresh thinking from Interbrand
Sheryl Connelly
Sheryl Connelly

Meet Ford's Resident Futurist
Highlighting the Present—and Future—of Branding in Latin America and Iberia