brands under fire

Lululemon Has No Interest in Plus-Size Consumers, Insiders Say

Posted by Sheila Shayon on August 1, 2013 03:47 PM

Lululemon Athletica is becoming quite the newsmaker. Since the yoga apparel brand made headlines back in March after pulling its proprietary 'luon' yoga pants off shelves due to "sheerness," the company can't seem to stay out of the limelight.

After ousting its chief product officer, losing its CEO and being berated by disappointed customers, the brand is now under fire again for an offense that has become a common topic among today's clothing giants. In an article by The Huffington Post, former Lululemon employees accused the brand of purposely shunning plus-size customers, relegating larger-sized apparel to a "heap" in the backs of stores.

While most of the merchandise was displayed "out on the floor, hung on the walls, or folded neatly in cabinets," larger sizes, such as 10s and 12s, were not stocked on those same shelves, and were rarely offered in the latest styles and prints. "All the other merchandise in the store was kind of sacred, but these were thrown in a heap," former employee Elizabeth Licorish told HuffPost. "It was definitely discriminatory to those who wear larger sizes."

Lululemon isn't alone on the hotseat. The retailer is keeping company with young adult clothier Abercrombie & Fitch, which came under fire in May for comments CEO Mike Jeffries made a few years back, admitting, "Candidly, we go after the cool kids. We go after the attractive all-American kid with a great attitude and a lot of friends. A lot of people don’t belong [in our clothes], and they can’t belong. Are we exclusionary? Absolutely.” The resurgence of Jeffries' comments caused many consumers to boycott the brand and sign petitions against it. Shortly after, A&F reported a 13 percent drop in same-store sales in its first quarter. 

Critics can't say the same for Lululemon. The brand emerged relatively unscathed from the "sheer pants" problem—a likely result of its cult-like consumer culture that preaches a type of mind, body and soul manifesto. The stock is up 34 percent since hitting a 52-week low in June, soon after CEO Christine Day announced her departure

As for retail strategy, instead of expanding into the $14 billion plus-size apparel industry—like Forever 21, H&M, Gap and Oldy Navy have—Lululemon is working on building out its menswear. The retailer recently sponsored the Wall Street Decathlon, clothing 173 bankers, traders and analysts in Lululemon shirts and shorts. 

"With the decathlon partnership, Lululemon is looking to duplicate the cult-like following it has with women," Alfred DuPuy, managing director of Interbrand Toronto, told the Business of Fashion blog. "When people like the product, they want to pass it on to other people, their tribe. Brands can definitely evolve. The guy who’s telling you it’s girly today, in two years might say, ‘I love Lululemon, I get it.'"

It's also expanding its physical operations—bending over backwards, you might say, to better accommodate customers. The brand recently purchased a 300,000 square-foot facility in Columbus, Ohio to serve as its second US distribution center—and a more efficient gateway to the Midwest and Eastern regions of the US.

Comments

Brady United States says:

Being a male, I will never purchase, nor wear with enthusiasm, anything that says "lululemon" on it. It sounds too much like Lala Loopsy, which is some kind of dolls for little girls or something. I would much rather prefer already well established active wear brands in my geographic region. Nike, Under Armour, Adidas. I will also poke fun at any male I ever see wearing lululemon. If you want to make a guys' line, feel free. I, with extreme sincerity, suggest you come up with a different, more masculine name for the line, especially if you want to appeal at all to conservative, homegrown, tough, midwestern country boys (a very large part of the population) whose families have money. They also participate in sports and thus buy active wear as well. Otherwise, you will miss a good chunk of the midwestern male market.

August 2, 2013 02:19 PM #

Kim Phillips United States says:

So we shop somewhere else. I knew without setting foot in the place that they wouldn't have larger sizes...after all size 10 and 12 are clearly morbidly obese. Ladies that size would never exercise, right?

August 3, 2013 11:04 AM #

Kathy Australia says:

As a plus size woman - and a clothing designer - I have started to get a bit tired of media beat-ups about how companies choose to market themselves and their products. If you don't like what a company makes, it doesn't suit you, fit you or you don't like the way they market themselves - just shop somewhere else. You have that choice - just like a company has the choice to create the kind of clothes they want to and create their own  'brand'. demonising a company for their legitimate design and marketing choices is not OK.

August 4, 2013 05:20 PM #

Stacey United States says:

So true. Dollars speak so much louder than words.

August 4, 2013 06:56 PM #

Comments are closed

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameo2014 Product Placement Awards
Apple loses its crown to a new #1
Coca-ColaIt's the Journey That Matters:
Coca-Cola Opens Up With Story-Based Web Refresh
debateJoin the Debate
Is product placement a waste of money?
Arthur Chinski and Joshua Mizrahi
Model Behavior? Brands Beware
U.S. Legal Changes Impact Use of Brand Ambassadors
paperCorporate Citizenship in Canada
Fresh thinking from Interbrand
Sheryl Connelly
Sheryl Connelly

Meet Ford's Resident Futurist
MetaluxuryMeta-Luxury
Brands and the pursuit of excellence

Advertisements