The Rail Company And True Story Behind 'Unstoppable'

Posted by Abe Sauer on November 11, 2010 04:00 PM

This weekend's big-budget blow-it-all-up action film Unstoppable, about an out-of- control locomotive hauling deadly cargo, claims to be "based on true events." The film paints the rail company as the greedy antagonist, out to make decisions based on the bottom line and not on people's lives. In the film, that company is called "AVVR."

So what were those true events and what rail company was really involved?

The 2001 incident upon which the film is based happened with the company CSX. Yes, that CSX, of the "How tomorrow moves" commercials touting "a ton of freight… a gallon of fuel."

The incident report notes that on May 15, 2001 "an unmanned CSX yard train consisting of one model SD-40-2 locomotive, 22 loaded, and 25 empty cars, 2898 gross trailing tons, departed Stanley Yard, which is located in Walbridge, Ohio. The uncontrolled movement proceeded south for a distance of 66 miles…"

The report notes that the locomotive became unmanned during a rather dumb blunder that fairly begged to be made into an action film:

"While the train was still moving at a speed of approximately 8 mph, the engineer dismounted the locomotive and ran ahead to reposition the switch before the train could run through and cause damage to the switch. The engineer was successful in operating the switch just seconds before the train reached it. The engineer than ran along side the locomotive and attempted to reboard. However, the speed of the train had not decreased as the engineer had expected but had increased to approximately 12 mph. Due to poor footing and wet grab handles on the locomotive, the engineer was unable to pull himself up on the locomotives ladder. He dragged along for approximately 80 feet until he released his grip on the hand rails and fell to the ground."

It turns out that the train was eventually brought to a halt in the same fashion the movie attempts, though with certainly less drama:

"At Kenton, Ohio, near mile post 67, the crew of Q63615 successfully caught the runaway equipment and succeeded in coupling to the rear car, at a speed of 51 mph. The engineer gradually applied the dynamic brake of his locomotive, taking care not to break the train apart. By the time the train passed over Route 31 south of Kenton, the engineer had slowed the speed of the train to approximately 11 mph. Positioned at the crossing was CSX Trainmaster Jon Hosfeld, who was able to run along side the unmanned locomotive and climb aboard. The trainmaster immediately shut down the throttle, and the train quickly came to a stop."

The engine from the incident, CSX 8888, has now become a bit of a icon for trainspotters. The Internet is littered with videos and tales from rail aficionados on the "infamous 8888."

By all accounts, including the official final investigation, CSX acted responsibly and swiftly bringing its engine to a stop. But it's understandable why the company might not want to relive the incident by approving its brand for use in the film. (trailer below)



Keep up with your favorite celebrity Peru says:

Way to go Denzel and Rosario!! Great job!

November 13, 2010 09:09 PM #

steve fuss United States says:

there are lots of these rail disasters to choose from, runaway train on the Cajon pass and the pipeline explosion shortly after that derailment.  the Commerce, CA train wreck, the Passenger vs Freight wreck in Canada (Discovery Channel), Baltimore tunnel fire. This is not a high tech industry and is undermanned and under regulated with only a few operating corp's left.

November 14, 2010 09:01 PM #

Terri United States says:

My husband is an engineer for CSX. He is proud of his job and loves it. For you to say that his position as a locomotive engineer is "undermanned and under regulated" shows you know nothing about it.

They work around the main headquarters and FRA (Federal Railroad Administration) officials are constantly watching and maintaining records on them. In the yards and along the distance of the run. Safety is paramount. It is priority one all the way across the board, even to the track maintenance department where our son works. They are, if anything, over regulated. That keeps things as safe as possible. Between the two of us, we have at least 30 relatives who've spent their lives working for CSX, Seaboard Coastline prior to the merger, and Clinchfield. It is an honorable profession.

Accidents are going to happen when people make stupid mistakes in a moment of panic, wanting to protect themselves from being fired. That's just life. Regulations remind people to do things safely. It is becoming safer and safer as a result.

What you should worry about is the fact that track can warp or even break due to extremes in temperature. That causes me a lot of worry.

November 16, 2010 03:24 PM #

Comments are closed

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameo2014 Product Placement Awards
Apple loses its crown to a new #1
Coca-ColaIt's the Journey That Matters:
Coca-Cola Opens Up With Story-Based Web Refresh
debateJoin the Debate
Is product placement a waste of money?
Arthur Chinski and Joshua Mizrahi
Model Behavior? Brands Beware
U.S. Legal Changes Impact Use of Brand Ambassadors
paperCorporate Citizenship in Canada
Fresh thinking from Interbrand
Sheryl Connelly
Sheryl Connelly

Meet Ford's Resident Futurist
Highlighting the Present—and Future—of Branding in Latin America and Iberia