|
|
|
| |
Is internal branding a strength or a weakness?
|
|
|
| |
Successful brands build loyal relationships with customers. These relationships are built by employees, based on their consistent delivery of the brand promise. Thus, successful brands are those that align employee actions with a position that customers find unique and meaningful.
That said, internal branding is about more that a "Go team, go!" mentality. It's about supporting your competitive advantage at every level of the organization, in every activity. Which means ensuring compensation structures, reporting systems - everything - tracks progress against the brand strategy. In order for internal branding to work, organizations need to see the brand as the corporate strategy, not just a communications platform.
|
|
Stephanie Jackman, Integrated Marketing Strategist, Venture Communications - April 1, 2002
|
|
|
Internal branding is one consistent hallmark of successful companies. If you think about it, external branding -- advertising, P.R., corporate design, etc. -- are a reflection of the delivery of the brand by the people who work for the company, i.e., the employees. The training, motivation, and rewards that inspire them are key to that delivery.
|
|
Mark Hornung, Managing Partner, West, JWT Specialized Communications - April 1, 2002
|
|
|
Successful internal branding requires more than just letting your employees in on your latest advertising campaign messages and/or short-range business or sales goals. Rather, successful internal branding is a reflection of the executive leadership and their strategic positioning and direction for the company. It allows your employees to recognize that everyone in your organization, from the top down, is on the same page. It emphasizes your fundamental promise to your customers, and outlines a means for delivering on this promise...a way for every employee to be a part of the larger picture. In this way, it gives employees a sense of ownership within the company, as well as a sense of place. It fosters loyalty among staff members in the same way that external brand initiatives foster loyalty among consumers.
I would agree with many of the other comments on this subject -- that internal branding is "what you make of it." If it's handled in a tactical, shallow manner, it is bound to be a waste of resources and ultimately counter-productive. But if it is handled correctly, it has the potential to be a profound tool that can increase performance, employee satisfaction and ultimately -- profits.
|
|
Paul Corrigan, Vice President, Solomon - April 1, 2002
|
|
|
The danger of internal branding lies in the same areas of product/service branding. If company policies and executives do not live up to the brand promise internal branding is doomed to failure. By nature of the employer/employee relationship, employees will be much more sensitive to internal branding missteps than their consumer counterparts are to faulty branding of retail goods. Any policy, human resource issue or communication not in line with the internal brand promise will be harshly reviewed by the “customers.” These missteps will be reinforced, at the water cooler, by the company’s worst spokespeople, diminishing gains realized.
If the goal is branding "employment" as opposed to branding the "company," keep in mind that there are many items beyond the employer’s control that affect the employee’s brand perception. An employee’s view of employment and thus their employer and employment includes their commute, coworkers, managers, customers, clients, facilities and perception of the company’s competition as well as the service providers, equipment and products they experience on a day to day basis.
|
|
Greg Padley, AE, RFC&P - April 1, 2002
|
|
|
Years ago, in "In Search of Excellence," Tom Peters explained that every company has a culture, and that successful companies were often the ones that recognized their culture and made it work for them. As opposed to fighting it or trying to be something they were not.
This is what internal branding is about. Recognizing that each corporation’s culture is distinct and then not merely embracing it, but bringing it to life in a meaningful way. How? Bonuses, commissions, benefits - these are often bandied about. But corporate culture (and therefore internal branding) also has to do with rules and regulations – dress codes, tolerance issues, hierarchies, enforcement of punctuality, levels of respect, accepted methods of operation. Corporate culture is about all the ways an employee connects with the employer.
And so is internal branding. So the question isn’t "is internal branding good or bad?" The question is "What is your internal brand, and is it helping you or hurting you?"
|
|
Martin Bihl, CD, Renegade Marketing Group - April 1, 2002
|
|
|
Brand building is more than running a lot of ads. It's a company-wide program that ensures the brand promise is delivered on. Internal branding is an aspect of brand management. When done properly it can be a very motivating force. Though designed for the service sector, I've seen it at nonprofits and the manufacturing sectors too. An important aspect of corporate brand mgmt is to teach employees and management how to communicate the brand strategy when they interact with customers and other key audiences (e.g., investors, the media). Assuming the brand strategy has identified a relevant competitive advantage and the corresponding customer benefit, then these become the platform for all communications, i.e., advertising, pr, dm, recruiting, and employee communications. The point of employee communications is to let folks know why the company is better than the competition. It should also inspire them to help communicate that message as well as look for new ways to express it and new ways to support it. Companies with a solid brand know this (e.g., Disney). Other companies simply run a lot of ads. This gives them high recognition, but no one knows why they should select them over a competitor.
|
|
Ken Goldman, Brand Consultant - April 2, 2002
|
|
|
If internal branding is viewed simply as an esteem-building process then it’s definitely a waste of time, money and opportunity. However, if the company brand isn’t supported internally it’s impossible to build a functional brand of any type. Done properly, internal branding is an invaluable business tool that supports the business plan.
Company-wide understanding of what the company stands for, where it’s going, and how it plans to get there is the key to aligning management/staff expectations, simplifying internal communications, and creating a common sense of purpose. As a result, the effort ordinarily expended holding a misaligned group together can be redirected to advancing the business — the goal of all smart companies.
|
|
Bob Grindeland, Principal, Methodologie, Inc. - April 8, 2002
|
|
|
If internal branding has no merit, then why is society in general, and are individuals more specifically, so fixated on introspection? Why do we try to better ourselves? Why do we try to identify weaknesses and strengths, then better them? Could it be that we want to become better at our chosen craft? A better partner / spouse? Maybe a better member of our community? Ah, there it is. A better part of our community. After all, what is an organization without people? It's paper and nothing more. And what is an organization without a driving force and focus? It's a community with no reason for being, or at least no reason for belonging to.
People want to belong. So much so that they will, at times, go to extraordinary lengths to find, or even create, it. Internal branding gives focus and purpose to a community. When created, communicated and demonstrated correctly, it provides a greater purpose for our getting up and getting to our jobs every day. It creates belonging. And when the brand goes external, it creates the desire to "belong" with targeted groups. It will be felt and it is the source of emotion behind individual brands.
Is it easy? No. Is it a waste? Only if you believe that people operate best without purpose in their work. Could it require more than organizational change? It could go as far as to require an entire business plan to be rethought without the burden of historical bias weighing too heavily on future guidance. Who has the guts to undertake such a task? This can be the topic of the next debate: Leadership.
|
|
T. Kurt Bentley, Director of Brand Development, Emergence Creative Labs - April 8, 2002
|
|
|
In agreement with Lindsay Marshall's comments on 'brand dissonance,' the challenge with (internal) branding, which I've experienced professionally, is that a disconnection occurs and is revisited each time a brand fails to meet it's promise, either externally to the consumer or internally to the employee. Some may debate about proper budget allocations, resources, authorizing change agents to set in motion a successful program, but remember it's employee driven —if employees don't believe in the brand's credibility and deliver a consistent message and valuable experience, then it is a waste. It's not a matter of just enlightening employees, it's about taking a look at what values are in conflict (priorities are influenced by values), and the relevant value built through an internal branding program.
What does providing a better brand experience for the consumer also offer that is of benefit to the front line employee?
|
|
Richard Long, Graphic Designer - April 8, 2002
|
|
|
'Internal Branding' is really the wrong word. It is not about branding non-marketing, e.g., production staff, but getting them to contribute to the branding effort in all 'moments of truth' where contact with customers or other stakeholders is involved. 'Internal Branding Extension' might be a better word, meaning the extension of the branding effort to include non-marketing staff (and maybe even some marketing people like the ones in sales who are not fully contributing to the branding effort).
The question is not whether it is important (IT IS!), but how to best get non-brand marketing staff on board. One way which I found very effective is to simply explain to non-brand-marketing staff how branding actually works, give them a 'feely' understanding, and then let them define what they can DO in their own job to contribute better to the overall branding effort. I have done this successfully on a number of occasions. The approach is based on the assumption that non-brand marketing staff know their jobs better than some 'marketing guy' who comes along to tell them something. It is important though to get a change of behaviour out of this exercise, not just a change of attitudes!
|
|
Professor Guenther Mueller-Heumann, Emeritus Professor of Marketing, New Zealand Marketing Management Programmes - April 8, 2002
|
|
|
Truly successful brands are seamless across all levels of a company’s communications, from logos to ads, from employee benefits to the music you hear in the office lobby. To that end, the internal brand should flow logically and beautifully from the core brand idea.
Sure, no internal branding campaign is better than one that’s pandering or poorly planned. But know that internal branding is not a poster or picnic or newsletter or referral program or any other execution from Human Resources 101. Rather, it’s a logical extension of what the brand stands for.
If a company has a strong brand, it will build employee loyalty. And loyal employees lead to increased service levels, which lead to increased revenues, which make shareholders very happy.
Further, study after study reminds us that salary is never the number one factor in employee satisfaction. If you’re miserable at work, you remain miserable with a 5% raise. But a great culture, an internal brand that employees can grasp and become excited by, triggers the loyalty gene in your best employees and acts as a lightening rod with top talent. Its effect is tantamount to a cult.
When done right, the internal brand is strong stuff.
|
|
Cliff Courtney, Consultant/Writer, Jumbo Green - April 8, 2002
|
|
|
I know how easy it is to be cynical about internal branding --especially when it's perceived as some goofy HR program that insults your intelligence by not focusing on what really matters to you as an employee, and as a person.
But, for a handful of companies who have figured out that employees ARE the brand, the rewards of internal branding are considerable.
Once management focuses on how to keep people centered and involved with their company's objectives, they'll enjoy the returns of a mobilized, inspired workforce. It isn't flavor of the week stuff, it works. I've experienced it first hand.
But, it has to be treated seriously -- with dedicated resources allocated to continually engage people. I believe it involves competitive pay and bonuses, a respectful work environment, advancement based on merit and communication that ties to business strategy. Nothing new here in the telling -- but it amazes me how few leaders take on this challenge with a long-term commitment to the foot soldiers who make things happen -- the employees.
Perhaps we should base CEO compensation on the opinions of employees around their leaders' abilities to command, lead communicate and engage people in the brand from the inside.
Think anyone would sign up for that job?
|
|
Larry Eckerle, Managing Partner, Zero Gravity Group - April 17, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
back to debate
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2013 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|
|